100% Zufriedenheitsgarantie Sofort verfügbar nach Zahlung Sowohl online als auch als PDF Du bist an nichts gebunden
logo-home
Summary Institutional and Substantive Law of the EU 7,69 €   In den Einkaufswagen

Zusammenfassung

Summary Institutional and Substantive Law of the EU

1 bewertung
 94 mal angesehen  8 mal verkauft
  • Kurs
  • Hochschule

The pdf contains a summary of the second part of the course Institutional and Substantive Law.

vorschau 4 aus 39   Seiten

  • 31. august 2022
  • 39
  • 2021/2022
  • Zusammenfassung

1  bewertung

review-writer-avatar

von: 12yaaac • 1 Jahr vor

avatar-seller
Free movement of goods

- Free movement of goods is secured through the elimination of customs duties and
quantitative restrictions and the prohibition of MEE

- Eliminating all obstacles to trade in the EU

- Right of free movement of goods originating in MS’s and goods from third countries in
free circulation

- The creation of the single market necessitated the elimination of all remaining obstacles
to the free movement of goods

- What did the EU do to abolish obstacles? → Fiscal and Non Fiscal Rules

Goods: Products which can be valued in money and which are capable, of forming the subject of
commercial transactions Commission v Italy 1968
- Ex: Waste, Electricity

Internal market: An area without frontiers in which the free movement of goods, persons,
services and capital is ensured

Legal basis: Art. 34/35 TFEU
ART 3 (3) + ART 26 TFEU → Definition of the IM
ART 28(1) → Customs Union
ART 29 TFEU→ Products considered to be in free circulation IF the import formalities
have been complied with and any customs duties/CEEs due have been
levied in a MS
- Case: Donckerwolcke
ART 30 TFEU → Customs duties on imports & exports & charges having equivalent
effect shall be prohibited between MS (Fiscal)
ART 34 TFEU→ Ban on quantitative restrictions on imports and measures that have an
equivalent effect (MEQR). (Non-Fiscal)
ART 35 TFEU → Ban on quantitative restrictions on exports and measures that have an
equivalent effect (Non-Fiscal)
ART 36 TFEU → Justifications
ART 110(1) TFEU → Prohibition of discrimination internal taxation (Fiscal)
ART 110(2) TFEU → Prohibition of protectionism
ART 114 TFEU→ Achievement of the IM

,Free movement of goods achievement through:
1. Prohibition of customs duties and charges of equivalent effect or CEEs (ART 30
TFEU)
2. Prohibition of quantitative restrictions and measures of equivalent effect or MEEs
(ART 4/36 TFEU)
3. Prohibition of discriminatory internal taxation (ART 110 TFEU)

→ all directly applicable EXCEPT Capital → Mutual recognition applied

Customs duties → Charges levied on goods by reason of the fact that they cross a frontier
between MS’s

Charges of Equivalent effect: ART 30
Diamonds 1969 (para 9) → Any pecuniary charge however small & whatever designation &
mode of application imposed on domestic or foreign goods, by
reason of fact they cross a frontier.

Quantitative restrictions: ART 34-35
Geddo 1973 → “Measures which amount to total or partial restraint of...imports, exports of goods
in transit”

MEQR: ART 34-35
Dassonville (par. 5) → ‘All trading rules enacted by MS which are capable of hindering, directly
or indirectly, actually or potentially, intra-community trade”
- Broad
- Buy Irish (para 25)
→ Inappropriate to consider statistical evidence as to the volume of imports of products
subject to the national measure (Campaign made imports rise)
- Trailers 2009 (para 37)
→ Added: “Any measure which hinders access to the market” also constitutes an MEE

Summary:
ART 30/110 → CEE
ART 34/35/36 → MEQR

Customs Union
Art. 28(1) TFEU → EU constitutes a customs union covering all trade in goods
- Uniform rules for goods coming from third countries
Ex: 1) A common customs tariff (ART 31 TFEU)
2) Common commercial policy in trade with third countries (ART 207 TFEU)

,Distinctly applicable measures: Makes a distinction
- Caught by Art 34
- Justified on Art 36
- Ex: Buy Irish / Comm v UK

Indistinctly applicable measures: Applies to imports, exports and domestic products
- Rule of Reason Principle (Mandatory Requirements)
- Cassis de Dijon
- Justified: Art 30 Derogations (Not exhaustive list)

Mutual recognition Cassis de Dijon (para 8)
Mutual recognition: Ensures market access for goods
- Guarantees that any good lawfully sold in one EU country can be sold in another
Justification to go against Mutual Recognition → Mandatory Requirements
- (Art 30 Derogations)

→ Possible even if the goods do not fully comply with the technical rules of the other country
Exceptions: When public safety, health or the environment are concerned

Selling Arrangements:→ Opinion of Tesauro Advocate General (C-292/92) (Par 9)
- Who / Where /When / How
- Not MEE Keck Case (Par 16)
- If discriminatory→ Then Yes MEE → Art 34

Product Requirement: Form, presentation, packaging, labeling, weight, size
- Keck Case (Par 15)
- Prohibited under Art 34 TFEU
- Justifications Art 36
- Is it proportionate?Comm vs Austria & Comm vs Germany
1. Suitable
- Appropriate to achieve?
2. Necessary
- Less restrictive means?
3. Balance
- Private vs public interest

, Justifications
1. Art 36
2. Mandatory Requirements
- Effectiveness of fiscal supervision, the protection of public health, the fairness
of commercial transactions and the protection of the consumer
- Established in Cassis De Dijon

Discrimination Tax
Art 110
- NO MS can impose direct or indirect taxation on import goods
2 Prohibitions: 1. Internal Discrimination Tax
- Art 110(1)
- Similar Domestic Products
2. Internal Tax Protection
- Art 110(2)
- Permissive

1. Art 110(1) (Discrimination)
- Prohibition applies if: 1. Imported + Domestic products are similar
2. Discrimination
a. Similar Products: Characteristics, Method of Manufacturing, Consumer
Perception
Ex: Walker Case - Danish System different taxation Scotch/Fruit
Wine
Comm v France - light vs dark tobacco
b. Discrimination
- Direct: Tax scheme explicitly differentiates based on origin of
products
- Indirect: Not explicit but higher tax burden
- Ex: CAMPAIGN (Buy Irish)
- Humblot
- Comm v France
2. Art 110(2) (Proh of Protectionism)
- Applies if: 1. Imp/Dom are in competition
Ex: Comm vs UK (wine v beer)

Remedy
Art 110(1) → Equalize tax on similar products
Art 110(2) → Elimination protection effect

Alle Vorteile der Zusammenfassungen von Stuvia auf einen Blick:

Garantiert gute Qualität durch Reviews

Garantiert gute Qualität durch Reviews

Stuvia Verkäufer haben mehr als 700.000 Zusammenfassungen beurteilt. Deshalb weißt du dass du das beste Dokument kaufst.

Schnell und einfach kaufen

Schnell und einfach kaufen

Man bezahlt schnell und einfach mit iDeal, Kreditkarte oder Stuvia-Kredit für die Zusammenfassungen. Man braucht keine Mitgliedschaft.

Konzentration auf den Kern der Sache

Konzentration auf den Kern der Sache

Deine Mitstudenten schreiben die Zusammenfassungen. Deshalb enthalten die Zusammenfassungen immer aktuelle, zuverlässige und up-to-date Informationen. Damit kommst du schnell zum Kern der Sache.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Was bekomme ich, wenn ich dieses Dokument kaufe?

Du erhältst eine PDF-Datei, die sofort nach dem Kauf verfügbar ist. Das gekaufte Dokument ist jederzeit, überall und unbegrenzt über dein Profil zugänglich.

Zufriedenheitsgarantie: Wie funktioniert das?

Unsere Zufriedenheitsgarantie sorgt dafür, dass du immer eine Lernunterlage findest, die zu dir passt. Du füllst ein Formular aus und unser Kundendienstteam kümmert sich um den Rest.

Wem kaufe ich diese Zusammenfassung ab?

Stuvia ist ein Marktplatz, du kaufst dieses Dokument also nicht von uns, sondern vom Verkäufer smahd. Stuvia erleichtert die Zahlung an den Verkäufer.

Werde ich an ein Abonnement gebunden sein?

Nein, du kaufst diese Zusammenfassung nur für 7,69 €. Du bist nach deinem Kauf an nichts gebunden.

Kann man Stuvia trauen?

4.6 Sterne auf Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

45.681 Zusammenfassungen wurden in den letzten 30 Tagen verkauft

Gegründet 2010, seit 14 Jahren die erste Adresse für Zusammenfassungen

Starte mit dem Verkauf
7,69 €  8x  verkauft
  • (1)
  Kaufen