100% Zufriedenheitsgarantie Sofort verfügbar nach Zahlung Sowohl online als auch als PDF Du bist an nichts gebunden 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Zusammenfassung

Summary Research Methods Workshop: Survey

Bewertung
-
Verkauft
-
seiten
9
Hochgeladen auf
08-02-2023
geschrieben in
2019/2020

In detail summary of book chapters and lectures of Survey Workshop

Hochschule
Kurs









Ups! Dein Dokument kann gerade nicht geladen werden. Versuch es erneut oder kontaktiere den Support.

Schule, Studium & Fach

Hochschule
Studium
Kurs

Dokument Information

Hochgeladen auf
8. februar 2023
Anzahl der Seiten
9
geschrieben in
2019/2020
Typ
Zusammenfassung

Themen

Inhaltsvorschau

Survey Workshop Lectures, Dr. Marcel van Egmond

Chapter 2: Types of Error in Surveys
• design and data collection a ect potential error

Error associated with who answers
• error because sample does not completely mirror population -> sampling error
• random error
• bias, when population is not represented properly

Error associated with answers
• how well answers correspond to the „truth“
• errors can be caused by misunderstanding questions, not having the information, distorting
answers to look better, etc.
• validity
• people tend to over-and underreport depending on the topic of the question

Chapter 6: Designing Questions to be Good Measures
• increasing reliability of answers: ensuring consistent measurement by providing the same set
of questions to every respondent
• good question:
a. question-answer process is entirely scripted
b. question means the same to every respondent (no space for misinterpretations)
c. kinds of answers that constitute an appropriate response to the question are
communicated consistently to all respondents
• no inadequate and incomplete wording
• open questions:
• can provide unexpected answers
• may describe view of respondent better
• respondents can answer in own words
• closed questions
• respondent can answer more reliable
• answers are more likely to be analytically interesting
• easier to record for researchers

Chapter 7: Evaluating Survey Questions and Instruments
De ning Objectives
• which variables are dependent
• which variables are independent
• which variables are needed as control or intervening variables to explain patterns and to
check hypothesis
Preliminary Question Design Steps
Focus Groups
• conduct focused discussions with people who are in your study population
• e.g. when goal is to measure number of visits to doctor, group discussion focuses on
what counts as visit to doctor
Drafting Questions
• background questions are standard to many surveys


1

, • copies of original survey instruments from major survey organization often useful to
draft own questions
• all questions should be tested to make sure they work

Pre-survey Evaluation
Critical Systematic Review
• when set of questions is drafted
Cognitive Laboratory Interviews
• can people consistently understand and answer the questions?
• early versions often contain confusing, cannot be read as written or are virtually
unanswerable by anyone
• respondents should evaluate survey

Design, Format and Layout of Survey Instrument
• order the questions: rst easy, straight-forwarded questions (help to get respondent into
survey)
• help respondents to handle common navigational challenges (how to correct previous answer)


Lecture 1, Wed. 9.01.2019, Valid Answers? Proper Questions!
1. Errors in Surveys: What could possibly go wrong?
a. depending on chosen sample, sample must be representative for population
b. sample can be biased
c. we don’t want random error (although overall we can expect good representation of
opinion) nor bias (systematic bias can give you insight too, either under- or overestimating)
d. not accurate answers because more desirable

Random Biased (systematic)
Sample: sampling error Sample bias
• it happens • First row students?

Questions: invalidity Question: bias
• „honest mistakes“ • Did you read the literature for today?
• problem if you want to look at individuals (still • massive overreport of reading the literature,
valid for population as whole) because people give more desirable answer
(because lecturer asked, if fellow students would
ask you would get a more honest answer)



2. Asking Questions
a. double-barreled
b. leading/biased
c. double-negative

Simple questions:
• „Is your systolic pressure normal at this moment?“
• Do respondents have the requisite knowledge? Questions should be understandable for
everyone. Answers can be easy for you, but di cult for others
• just give as many answer options as you really need/are relevant for you
• don’t make things complicated


2

Lerne den Verkäufer kennen

Seller avatar
Bewertungen des Ansehens basieren auf der Anzahl der Dokumente, die ein Verkäufer gegen eine Gebühr verkauft hat, und den Bewertungen, die er für diese Dokumente erhalten hat. Es gibt drei Stufen: Bronze, Silber und Gold. Je besser das Ansehen eines Verkäufers ist, desto mehr kannst du dich auf die Qualität der Arbeiten verlassen.
alixwinter2 Universiteit van Amsterdam
Folgen Sie müssen sich einloggen, um Studenten oder Kursen zu folgen.
Verkauft
63
Mitglied seit
3 Jahren
Anzahl der Follower
54
Dokumente
17
Zuletzt verkauft
7 Jahren vor

4,0

3 rezensionen

5
1
4
1
3
1
2
0
1
0

Kürzlich von dir angesehen.

Warum sich Studierende für Stuvia entscheiden

on Mitstudent*innen erstellt, durch Bewertungen verifiziert

Geschrieben von Student*innen, die bestanden haben und bewertet von anderen, die diese Studiendokumente verwendet haben.

Nicht zufrieden? Wähle ein anderes Dokument

Kein Problem! Du kannst direkt ein anderes Dokument wählen, das besser zu dem passt, was du suchst.

Bezahle wie du möchtest, fange sofort an zu lernen

Kein Abonnement, keine Verpflichtungen. Bezahle wie gewohnt per Kreditkarte oder Sofort und lade dein PDF-Dokument sofort herunter.

Student with book image

“Gekauft, heruntergeladen und bestanden. So einfach kann es sein.”

Alisha Student

Häufig gestellte Fragen