100% Zufriedenheitsgarantie Sofort verfügbar nach Zahlung Sowohl online als auch als PDF Du bist an nichts gebunden
logo-home
Lecture notes 7-13 Political philosophy and organization studies (431014-B-6) 5,39 €   In den Einkaufswagen

Notizen

Lecture notes 7-13 Political philosophy and organization studies (431014-B-6)

1 bewertung
 23 mal angesehen  7 mal verkauft
  • Kurs
  • Hochschule

Complete summary of lectures 7-13 from PPOS, which should be known for the second exam.

vorschau 3 aus 29   Seiten

  • 26. mai 2023
  • 29
  • 2022/2023
  • Notizen
  • Tim christiaens tim christiaens
  • Alle klassen

1  bewertung

review-writer-avatar

von: wilcovanderheijden • 1 Jahr vor

reply-writer-avatar

von: emmahamm • 1 Jahr vor

Von Google übersetzt

Thanks for the great review!

avatar-seller
HC Political Philosophy and Organ. Studies - PART 2, Emma Hamm 2078889




HC Political Philosophy and Organ.
Studies - PART 2

7. Michel Foucault on Power 2
8. Disciplinary Power 5
9. Neoliberalism 8
10. Expulsion 13
11. Contemporary issues: Post-Fordism 17
12. Contemporary issues: Econocracy 20
13. Platform Capitalism 25

, HC Political Philosophy and Organ. Studies - PART 2, Emma Hamm 2078889



7. Michel Foucault on Power
Critical theory
- Political philosophy as a branch of social philosophy
- Philosopher as cartographer

CRITICAL THEORY
Split in the tradition of political philosophy (see lecture 1)
→ Anglo-saxon normative theory (you suffer from conflicts of interests, so extract yourself from
society)
VS
→ continental critical theory (scaling up of question, what should WE as a society do?. Have critique
on the normative theory, because you are already in society / circle)
Start from non-ideal circumstances
● Presence of conflict: ‘politics is war through other means’ (Foucault)
Society; football match with 2 teams where no one sets the rules
engaging in conflict, but never becomes as intense as actual war (physical) - degree of
intensity, so not two completely different things as normative theory says. There is not a good
way of doing politics, because you always have a starting point in the debate (neutral position
not possible, as normative theorists argue).
● Political philosopher as cartographer of the present
→ Philosophy as ‘critique’

Mapping out the different conflicts. This is where the critique part comes from in philosophy
Critique of society at its present moment - what are the conditions where this idea comes from .
Bv; re-educating prisoners. How do we all have this idea? Because historically this wasn’t the case
- Conditions of possibilities
- Once you have done that; show that there are other options that hasn’t been explored yet
At each moment in history, possibilities that have not been utilized. Even today, all different options
open and society can change dramatically

What is the normative strategy?




- Normative; you have a set of moral standards and you apply them to reality
- Critical; in fact, you also have conflicts. By revealing those conflicts and those opportunities
not taken, you reveal the opportunities for change


MICHEL FOUCAULT
Who is Michel Foucault (1926-1984)?
Most of his work; not about politics, but about the history of science. History is not one line, there are
clear breaks where science completely revolutionized itself. Progression of different scientific

, HC Political Philosophy and Organ. Studies - PART 2, Emma Hamm 2078889


paradigms.
- if you want to produce knowledge, you need power relations
Bv; prisoners in the same building for years, researchers can do research on those people. They have
the power on criminals to lock them up and force them to different kind of therapy

● French political philosopher
● The interweaving of knowledge and power
(1) Traditional view
- Knowledge and power are opposed
- Conflicts of interest
- Example: tobacco industry and cancer research
Powers started funding research that claims the opposite of the truth. ‘Tobacco
doesn’t
cause cancer’

(2) Foucault’s view
- Knowledge and power presuppose each other (+work together)
- Knowledge informs the exercise of power + power facilitates the acquisition of
Knowledge
Bv research on tobacco and cancer. Within the lab a higher hierarchy of power. You
need
those to make the lab function. You need power to make research possible
Knowledge → exercise power → translate it back into knowledge
The norm is when power and knowledge work together.

● ⇒ VERY INTRINSICALLY CONNECTED. Should be one term; ‘Knowledge-power’
→ Every production of knowledge requires power relations and vice versa.
Truth/knowledge can be contested. You can formulate counter-knowledge: both sides
can produce knowledge, both sides can be true, yet they are not compatible
<verenigbaar>. There is no judge for who is right and who is wrong.

● Example: psychiatry – the abnormal people weren’t distinguished from the normal people.
Back then, those abnormal insane people spoke the truth. Were seen as a mirror of society
17-18; great enclosure. State decides that if they want a productive society, you need to have
productive people. Lock up the unproductive (abnormal, homeless, unemployed,...) →
distinguishing between productive and unproductive
18-19; group of unproductives → group of doctors come in and make distinctions in this group
between the normal and mentally ill people. The insane people should get therapy etc so
they can become normal again and re-enter society
Cooperation between doctors and capitalists: those who are sane should not be locked up,
and thus increase the amount of laborers and decrease the power of workers. We need to
cure insane people, through psychiatric treatment, so that they can as well be productive.
● Example: criminology – locking people up helps to create knowledge by forcing those people
to things like therapy




FOUCAULT’S TYPOLOGY OF POWER
Assumptions that Focault consents
Wrong assumptions you might have about power …
1. Power is bad
→ No, power is productive and can be legitimate

Alle Vorteile der Zusammenfassungen von Stuvia auf einen Blick:

Garantiert gute Qualität durch Reviews

Garantiert gute Qualität durch Reviews

Stuvia Verkäufer haben mehr als 700.000 Zusammenfassungen beurteilt. Deshalb weißt du dass du das beste Dokument kaufst.

Schnell und einfach kaufen

Schnell und einfach kaufen

Man bezahlt schnell und einfach mit iDeal, Kreditkarte oder Stuvia-Kredit für die Zusammenfassungen. Man braucht keine Mitgliedschaft.

Konzentration auf den Kern der Sache

Konzentration auf den Kern der Sache

Deine Mitstudenten schreiben die Zusammenfassungen. Deshalb enthalten die Zusammenfassungen immer aktuelle, zuverlässige und up-to-date Informationen. Damit kommst du schnell zum Kern der Sache.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Was bekomme ich, wenn ich dieses Dokument kaufe?

Du erhältst eine PDF-Datei, die sofort nach dem Kauf verfügbar ist. Das gekaufte Dokument ist jederzeit, überall und unbegrenzt über dein Profil zugänglich.

Zufriedenheitsgarantie: Wie funktioniert das?

Unsere Zufriedenheitsgarantie sorgt dafür, dass du immer eine Lernunterlage findest, die zu dir passt. Du füllst ein Formular aus und unser Kundendienstteam kümmert sich um den Rest.

Wem kaufe ich diese Zusammenfassung ab?

Stuvia ist ein Marktplatz, du kaufst dieses Dokument also nicht von uns, sondern vom Verkäufer emmahamm. Stuvia erleichtert die Zahlung an den Verkäufer.

Werde ich an ein Abonnement gebunden sein?

Nein, du kaufst diese Zusammenfassung nur für 5,39 €. Du bist nach deinem Kauf an nichts gebunden.

Kann man Stuvia trauen?

4.6 Sterne auf Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

45.681 Zusammenfassungen wurden in den letzten 30 Tagen verkauft

Gegründet 2010, seit 14 Jahren die erste Adresse für Zusammenfassungen

Starte mit dem Verkauf
5,39 €  7x  verkauft
  • (1)
  Kaufen