100% Zufriedenheitsgarantie Sofort verfügbar nach Zahlung Sowohl online als auch als PDF Du bist an nichts gebunden
Vorher von dir gesucht
Psychologist as Detective The An Introduction to Conducting Research in Psychology 6th Edition By Smith & Davis - Test Bank28,28 €
In den Einkaufswagen
, CHAPTER 1: PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH AND THE
RESEARCH METHODS COURSE
Activities/Assignments
Scientific Thinking. Hatcher (2000) presents an activity to introduce scientific thinking, perhaps
as an icebreaker on the first day of class. Students are given a riddle and can ask yes/no questions
until they come up with the right solution. Hatcher points out the similarities between solving
riddles and scientific thinking (e.g., “Persistence is a key quality in problem solving,” “By
expecting complicated answers, simple ones may be overlooked,” p. 123). Hatcher reports that
students enjoy the exercise and that it works well as an icebreaker activity.
Hatcher, J. W. (1990). Using riddles to introduce the process and experience of scientific
thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 17, 123-124.
The Research Process: An Overview. Wilson and Hershey (1996) describe an activity designed
to help students discover that they know more about the research process than they may think
they do. Students are given a sheet of paper with the phrase “Get idea for project” at the top and
“Publish the research paper” at the bottom. Students are to fill in any activities that they think
occur between these two steps. Their answers are then compared to the answers provided by 49
psychology professors. I’ve found that this activity works nicely as a first-day icebreaker –
students can work in small groups and thus meet some of their classmates.
Wilson, T. L., & Hershey, D. A. (1996). The research methods script. Teaching of
Psychology, 23, 97-99.
The Research Process for an Original Research Project. It’s often instructive for students
themselves to go through the components of the research process as seen in Table 1-2 (p. 4).
Students can go through the first 4-5 components (Problem, Literature Review, Theoretical
Considerations, Hypothesis, and Research Design) for a topic of interest to them (see handout
entitled The Research Process for an Original Research Project).
Becoming a Knowledgeable Consumer of Research. Connor-Greene (1993) describes an
interesting activity designed to help students think critically about popular press articles that
depict psychological research. During class in small groups, students read a short USA Today
article on biological differences between homosexual and heterosexual men (the article is
conveniently reprinted in the Appendix of Connor-Greene’s article). Students answer six
questions and then view excerpts of the research article from which the USA Today article is
based. An individual assignment is also discussed; students themselves can find a popular press
article describing research and then compare to the original research report.
Connor-Greene, P. A. (1993). From the laboratory to the headlines: Teaching critical
evaluation of press reports of research. Teaching of Psychology, 20, 167-169.
,Article Review. Each chapter in this Instructor’s Manual contains an “Article Review” in which
students read an empirical journal article and answer questions. The articles have been chosen
based on several factors. First, each article should be easily comprehended by students. Many of
the articles are older, in part because older articles tend to have somewhat simpler methodologies
(only one or two independent variables, only one study presented, etc.). Second, each article
should be interesting to students. Topics include, for example, sexual attraction, helping
behavior, and attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Third, each article should be related to the
chapter topic. For example, in the ethics chapter (Chapter 2), students will read an article
containing deception. In the survey chapter (Chapter 4), students will read an article containing a
telephone survey. Fourth, each article should be related not only to the chapter in which it is
presented, but also to past and future chapters. For example, many of the studies contain
deception so that instructors can revisit ethics throughout the course. Many of the questions for
each article review reference material from past chapters, so if you cover chapters out of order,
be aware that you may need to modify this activity accordingly.
Students need to have access to the full text of the articles in order to answer the questions, so
instructors could either make the articles available (e.g., on Reserve at the library) or have
students find the articles themselves at their library (this may not be feasible if students need to
use Interlibrary Loan).
The article for Chapter 1 is on handshakes and how aspects of the handshake (e.g., strength,
vigor) relate to gender, personality, and first impressions.
The questions for this Article Review focus primarily on the components of the research process
(see Table 1-2 on p. 4). There is some deception in this study, so it could be used in Chapter 2 as
well. In addition, a correlational research design is used, so this article could be used in Chapter
4.
Chaplin, W. F., Phillips, J. B., Brown, J. D., Clanton, N. R., & Stein, J. L. (2000).
Handshaking, gender, personality, and first impressions. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 79, 110-117.
Discovering Psychology: Understanding Research. This program provides an overview of the
research process and is available free online at http://www.learner.org/resources/series138.html.
, The Research Process for an Original Research Project
Each question below refers to one of the components of the research process as described in
Table 1-2 (p. 4) of your book. Try to come up with a research topic and study of interest to you
and answer the following questions.
1. Problem: Briefly describe the problem. In other words, what are you interested in
studying?
2. Literature Review: Briefly describe some empirical research pertaining to your topic.
3. Theoretical Considerations: What theory or theories are relevant to this research?
4. Hypothesis: What is your hypothesis?
5. Research Design: Briefly describe the research design. For example, how many
participants do you anticipate being in your study? What will those participants do as part
of their participation?
Alle Vorteile der Zusammenfassungen von Stuvia auf einen Blick:
Garantiert gute Qualität durch Reviews
Stuvia Verkäufer haben mehr als 700.000 Zusammenfassungen beurteilt. Deshalb weißt du dass du das beste Dokument kaufst.
Schnell und einfach kaufen
Man bezahlt schnell und einfach mit iDeal, Kreditkarte oder Stuvia-Kredit für die Zusammenfassungen. Man braucht keine Mitgliedschaft.
Konzentration auf den Kern der Sache
Deine Mitstudenten schreiben die Zusammenfassungen. Deshalb enthalten die Zusammenfassungen immer aktuelle, zuverlässige und up-to-date Informationen. Damit kommst du schnell zum Kern der Sache.
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Was bekomme ich, wenn ich dieses Dokument kaufe?
Du erhältst eine PDF-Datei, die sofort nach dem Kauf verfügbar ist. Das gekaufte Dokument ist jederzeit, überall und unbegrenzt über dein Profil zugänglich.
Zufriedenheitsgarantie: Wie funktioniert das?
Unsere Zufriedenheitsgarantie sorgt dafür, dass du immer eine Lernunterlage findest, die zu dir passt. Du füllst ein Formular aus und unser Kundendienstteam kümmert sich um den Rest.
Wem kaufe ich diese Zusammenfassung ab?
Stuvia ist ein Marktplatz, du kaufst dieses Dokument also nicht von uns, sondern vom Verkäufer ExamsExpert. Stuvia erleichtert die Zahlung an den Verkäufer.
Werde ich an ein Abonnement gebunden sein?
Nein, du kaufst diese Zusammenfassung nur für 28,28 €. Du bist nach deinem Kauf an nichts gebunden.
