I offer you a complete summary of the LAST!!! course of the second year of psychology. I included a lot of colours and graphics to make studying nicer and easier - It's like reading a good textbook, but way shorter. You can be sure that I included all important information for this course as me & a...
COURSE 2.8 defined by the action itself but by judgemental & evaluative processes
- only actions which can be scaled/measured are considered to constitute
PERFORMANCE @ WORK
performance
- outcome aspect refers to the consequences/result of the individual’s
behaviour
#1 PERFORMANCE IN THE WORKPLACE -> doesn’t only depend on factors other than the individuals performance
- criteria needed for evaluating the degree to which an individual’s performance meets
Learning Goals: What are the different types of job performance?
the organizational goals
How can you assess performance – which one is the best
measurement? PERFORMANCE AS A MULTIDIMENSIONAL CONCEPT
How do we reduce biases? by Borman & Motowidlo
#distortions
= distinguish between task & contextual performance
# strengths + weaknesses
- task performance (= refers to an individual’s proficiency w/ which he/she performs
activities which contribute to the organization’s technical core)
- can be direct (e.g.: production workers) or indirect (e.g.: managers or staff
CHAPTER 1
personnel)
Performance Concepts and Performance Theory
- contextual performance (= refers to activities which don’t contribute to the technical
by Sonnentag
core but which support the organizational, social, & psychological environment in which
= gives an overview of research on individual performance organization goals are pursued)
- 3 basic assumptions associated w/ the differentiation between task & contextual
Relevance of Individual Performance
performance
- highly performing individuals are needed in order to meet the organizations’ goals, to
1) activities relevant for task performance vary between jobs whereas contextual
deliver products & services + to achieve competitive advantage
performance activities are relatively similar across jobs
- it’s also important for the individual
2) task performance is related to ability, whereas contextual performance is
-> can be a source of satisfaction, feelings of mastery & pride
related to personality & motivation
-> low performance + not achieving goals -> dissatisfying or as personal
3) task performance is more prescribed & constitutes in-role behaviour,
failure
contextual performance is more discretionary & extra-role
-> is also rewarded by financial or other benefits
- performance – major prerequisite for future career development & success Task Performance
- is itself multi-dimensional & job-specific
Definition of Performance
- factors which refer to task performance
- differentiate between an action aspect & an outcome aspect of performance
1) job-specific task proficiency
- behavioural aspects refers to what an individual does in the work
2) non-job-specific task proficiency
situation – only behaviour which is relevant for the organizational goals
3) written & oral communication proficiency
- performance is what the organization hires one to do and do well – it’s not
4) supervision
1
, 5) management/administration - maintenance stage (= occurs when knowledge & skills needed to perform
=> each of them compromises subdimensions such as planning & organizing; well are learned -> task accomplishment becomes automatic)
guiding, directing, & motivating; training, coaching etc -> cognitive ability becomes less important -> other dispositional
factors (motivation, interest, values) increase in relevance
Contextual Performance
- empirical evidence that individuals differ with respect to patterns of intra-individual
- differentiate between 2 types of contextual performance, is similar between jobs
change -> no uniform pattern of performance development
1) behaviours which aim primarily @ the smooth functioning of the
- short-term variability in performance which is due to changes in an individual’s
organization as it’s @ the present moment
psycho-physiological state (+ processing capacity) across time
=> includes organizational citizenship behaviour w/ its 5
-> may be cause by long working hours etc
components (altruism, conscientiousness, civic virtue, courtesy, &
sportsmanship) PERSPECTIVES ON PERFORMANCE
2) proactive behaviours which aim @ changing & improving
work procedures & organizational processes in the future
=> include personal initiative, voice, taking charge
=> also a multidimensional concept
Relationship between Task & Contextual Performance
- can easily be distinguished @ the conceptual level + separated empirically
- they contribute uniquely to overall performance
- both are predicted by other individual variables
PERFORMANCE AS A DYNAMIC CONCEPT (+ is multidimensional)
= individual performance isn’t stable
-> variability reflects
1) learning processes & other long-term changes
-> performance initially increases w/ increasing time spent in a
specific job & later reaches a plateau
2) temporary changes in performance
- processes underlying performance change over time – from controlled processing
(the availability of declarative knowledge & optimal allocation of limited attentional Individual Differences Perspective
resources) to automatic processing (procedural knowledge & psychomotor abilities) = focuses on performance differences between individuals & seeks to identify
- changes in job performance are differentiated between a transition & a maintenance underlying factors
stage - core question: which individuals perform best?
- transition stage (= occurs when individuals are new in a job & tasks are novel) - differences in performance between individuals can be explained by individual
-> cognitive ability is important differences in abilities, personality, &/or motivation
2
,- Campbell experience & personality
-> general model of individual differences in performance -> suggests training programmes to improve individual prerequisites for high
-> differentiates performance component, determinants of job performance & performance
predictors of these determinants -> exposing individuals to specific experiences (e.g.: traineeships)
- performance component (= function of
Situational Perspective
1) declarative knowledge,
= refers to factors in the individual’s environment which stimulate & support or hinder
2) procedural knowledge & skills
performance
3) motivation)
- core question: in which situation do individuals perform best?
- largely neglects situational variables as predictors of performance
- most of the existing leadership research can be subsumed to this
- Motowidlo
- two major approaches about workplace factors & their relationship to individual
= agree that cognitive ability variables have an effect on task knowledge, task
performance
skills, & task habits
1) those that focus on situational factors which enhance & facilitate
-> task performance is predominantly a function of cognitive ability &
performance
contextual performance is a function of personality
2) and those that impede performance
-> both have minor factors on the other
1) -> Job Characteristics Model
- evidence speaks for a strong relationship between
= assumed that job characteristics have an effect on critical psychological
-> cognitive ability & job performance
states which in turn have an effect on personal & work outcomes (job
- general relationships between personality factors & job performance are relatively
performance)
small -> strongest relationship emerged for neuroticism/emotional stability &
-> expected an interaction effect w/ employee growth need strength
conscientiousness
= is a motivational model on job performance
-> differs between different jobs
// small but positive relationship between job characteristics & performance
- individual differences in motivation may be caused by differences in motivational traits
// causality
& skills
1) -> Sociotechnical Systems Theory
-> motivational traits are closely related to personality constructs
= describes work systems as composed of social & technical subsystems &
-> motivational skills refer to self-regulatory strategies pursued during goal
suggests that performance improvement can only follow from the joint
striving; are assumed to be more domain-specific & influenced by situational
optimization of both subsystems
factors + learning & training experiences; comprise emotional + motivational
- suggest a number of job design principles
control
-> more concerned w/ group performance than w/ individual performance
- self-efficacy is also highly relevant for performance
2) -> Role Theory
-> related to task & contextual performance
= role ambiguity & conflict are conceptualized as stressors that impede
- important for the learning process – in the beginning it’ a better predictor of
performance
performance than goals -> is reversed later on
// weak support for negative effects of role ambiguity & conflict
- practical implications
- situational constraints
-> focus on personnel selection – select individuals on basis of their abilities,
-> include stressors such as lack of necessary info, probs w/ machines &
3
, supplies as well as stressors within the work environment -> goal development, info search, planning, execution of an action
=> assumed to impair job performance directly & its monitoring, feedback processing can be distinguished
=> can also have an indirect effect on performance by requiring additional - structural point of view (= refers to its hierarchical organization)
regulation capacity - Broad Approach to Performance Regulation
// evidence is mixed -> incorporates the action theory as one of 5 perspectives
=> the lack of positive features in the work situation such as control @ work threatens 1) energetic regulation 2) emotional regulation 3) vitality regulation
performance more than the presence of some stressors 5) self-image regulation
- suggests: - closely linked to specific performance improvement interventions
- individual job performance can be improved by job design interventions e.g.: goal setting, feedback interventions
- Goal-setting Theory
Performance Regulation Perspective
= assumes that goals affect performance via
= takes a different look @ individual performance & is less interested in
1) efforts, 2) persistence, 3) direction, 4) task strategies
person/situational predictors/performance
++ supported by multiple studies
= focuses on the performance process itself & conceptualizes it as an action process
- core question: how does the performance process look like + what is happening when
someone is performing
PERFORMANCE IN CHANGING WORLD OF WORK
- Expert Research Approach within Cognitive Psychology
= main goals: to identify what distinguishes individuals @ Continuous Learning
different performance levels - consequence to quickly changing work requirements due to technological innovations
= focuses on process characteristics of the task accomplishment etc
process - competence development & learning become increasingly important
= aims @ description of these differences between high & - individuals need to be willing & able to engage in continuous learning processes in
moderate performers order to accomplish their present & future tasks successfully
- findings: high performers differ from moderate performers in the - suggested to incorporate learning into the performance concept
way they approach their tasks & how they arrive @ solutions -> adaptive performance (learning constitutes a major performance
-> during problem comprehension HP focus on abstract & dimension)
general info, proceed to specific info & apply a rational strategy in - when learning becomes a continuous necessity, the duration & occurrence of the
which they combine & integrate various aspects of the task & solution traditional skill acquisition vs. maintenance stage changes – skill acquisition is no longer
process a single event which is completed before maintenance starts
-> focus more on long-range goals, show more planning in complex -> individuals will go back & forth - ability will become increasingly important
& ill-structured tasks (not in well-structured)
- Action Theory Approach Proactivity
= describes the performance process from both a process & a structural point = becomes increasingly important
of view = to perform well is no longer sufficient to comply w/ prescribed job requirements but
- process point of view (= focuses on the sequential aspects of a action) to go beyond what is formally requested
4
Alle Vorteile der Zusammenfassungen von Stuvia auf einen Blick:
Garantiert gute Qualität durch Reviews
Stuvia Verkäufer haben mehr als 700.000 Zusammenfassungen beurteilt. Deshalb weißt du dass du das beste Dokument kaufst.
Schnell und einfach kaufen
Man bezahlt schnell und einfach mit iDeal, Kreditkarte oder Stuvia-Kredit für die Zusammenfassungen. Man braucht keine Mitgliedschaft.
Konzentration auf den Kern der Sache
Deine Mitstudenten schreiben die Zusammenfassungen. Deshalb enthalten die Zusammenfassungen immer aktuelle, zuverlässige und up-to-date Informationen. Damit kommst du schnell zum Kern der Sache.
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Was bekomme ich, wenn ich dieses Dokument kaufe?
Du erhältst eine PDF-Datei, die sofort nach dem Kauf verfügbar ist. Das gekaufte Dokument ist jederzeit, überall und unbegrenzt über dein Profil zugänglich.
Zufriedenheitsgarantie: Wie funktioniert das?
Unsere Zufriedenheitsgarantie sorgt dafür, dass du immer eine Lernunterlage findest, die zu dir passt. Du füllst ein Formular aus und unser Kundendienstteam kümmert sich um den Rest.
Wem kaufe ich diese Zusammenfassung ab?
Stuvia ist ein Marktplatz, du kaufst dieses Dokument also nicht von uns, sondern vom Verkäufer psychoel. Stuvia erleichtert die Zahlung an den Verkäufer.
Werde ich an ein Abonnement gebunden sein?
Nein, du kaufst diese Zusammenfassung nur für 15,99 €. Du bist nach deinem Kauf an nichts gebunden.
