100% Zufriedenheitsgarantie Sofort verfügbar nach Zahlung Sowohl online als auch als PDF Du bist an nichts gebunden
logo-home
Vorher von dir gesucht
Vorher von dir gesucht
logo
Solution Manual for The Economics of Health and Health Care 9e Sherman Folland, Allen C. Goodman, Miron Stano, Shooshan Danagoulian 16,14 €   In den Einkaufswagen
Navigiere schnell zu
Vorschau
  2.  
  3. Solution Manual
  4.  
  5. Solution Manual

Prüfung

Solution Manual for The Economics of Health and Health Care 9e Sherman Folland, Allen C. Goodman, Miron Stano, Shooshan Danagoulian
 16 mal angesehen  0 kauf
  • Kurs
  • Solution Manual
  • Hochschule
  • Solution Manual
  • Book
  • The Economics of Health and Health Care

Solution Manual for The Economics of Health and Health Care 9e Sherman Folland, Allen C. Goodman, Miron Stano, Shooshan Danagoulian

vorschau 4 aus 48   Seiten

Dokument Information

  • 3. april 2024
  • 48
  • 2023/2024
  • Prüfung
  • Fragen & Antworten

Themen

  • solution manual for the economics of health and he

Verknüpftes buch

book image

Buch Titel:

Autor(en):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Ausgabe:

Weitere Zusammenfassungen für

  • Solution Manual for The Economics of Health and Health Care 9e Sherman Folland, Allen C. Goodman, Miron Stano, Shooshan Danagoulian
Alles für dieses Buch (2)

Schule, Studium & Fach

  • Solution Manual
  • Solution Manual

Verkäufer

avatar-seller
solutions

Deine Reviews

Inhaltsvorschau

© 2017 Taylor & Francis The Economics of Health and Health Care Eighth Edition Instructor’s Answers Prepared by Allen C. Goodman PhD © 2017 Taylor & Francis Chapter 1 Introduction 1. a. Three factors: Population size – large increases in population size will lead to increased expenditures, even if expenditures per person stay constant. Quantity per person – increases in quantity per person will lead to a larger aggregate , even if prices and population size stay constant. Price of health care – price increases can increase total expenditures, particularly if the demand is inelastic, that is , not responding to the increased prices. b. Similarities – most observers view housi ng, food, and health care as necessities for a suitable standard of living. Differences – health care is most often paid for by insurance, breaking the link between price and quantity. 2. As noted in the text, we look at (1) uncertainty; (2) prominence of insurance; (3) problems of information; (4) frequently large role of nonprofit firms; (5) restrictions on compet ition. These are present to some degree in other goods, but most other goods do not feature all of them in concer t. 3. From 1960 to 1980, Spain’s share increased from 1.5% to 5.3%, an increase of 253%, the largest percentage increase. Canada’s share increased from 5.4% to 7.0%, an increase of 30%, the smallest percentage increase. From 1980 to 2015, Korea’s share increased from 3.4% to 7.2%, an increase of 112%, the largest percentage increase. Ireland’s share (from 1980 to 2015) increased from 8.3% to 9.4%, an increase of 13%, the smallest percentage increase. 4. U.S. shares have grown by much larger proportions from 1960 to 2015 than the other tw o countries. In 1960 , the U .S. actually spen t a smaller share than Canada. Both the U .K. and Canada have more centralized control of the health economy than the U .S. 5. From 1980 to 2009, the CPI grew from 82.4 to 236.7 or by 187%. From 1980 to 2014, the Hos pital and Related Services index grew from 69.2 to 743.2 or by 974%. From 1980 to 2014 , the Physician Services index grew from 76.5 to 361.7 or by 373%. 6. From 1970 to 2014, Private Health Insurance grew by a multiple of 61.6; Medicare by 79.5; and Medicaid by 89.0. From 2000 to 2014, Private Health Insurance grew by a multiple of 2.1; Medicare by 2.7; and Medicaid by 2.4. 7. Students and their instructors should go to the appropriate websites. As of August 2017 these are: CMS – www.cms.gov NIH – www.nih.gov OECD – www.oecd.org Kaiser Family Foundation – www.kff.org © 2017 Taylor & Francis Chapter 2 Microeconomic Tools for Health Economics 2. An improvement in the technology of producing health would increase the health intercept. An increase in available productive resources would increase both intercepts (i.e. , the entire curve would shift outward). 3. Inefficiency will be shown by an interior point ( A) in a production -possibility diagram (Figure E2.1). Two efficient combinations are shown by B and C. The cost is the decrease in production of other goods (opportunity cost), moving from point B to point C. The amount of other goods given up is shown by BD. 4. a. Increase in supply leads to lower equilibrium price and higher equilibrium quantity. b. Same as (a). c. Decrease in demand leads to lower equilibrium price and lower equilibrium quantity. d. No effect on equilibrium price and quantity, but if the ceiling price is below the eq uilibrium price there will be excess demand. 5. a. This curve is linear. b. This curve is curvilinear. 6. The Food axis (horizontal) shows the maximum quantity of Food if all income is spent on food (i.e., none on health services). The reverse holds for the OG axis (vertical). The budget constraint will be unaffected if the income level and both prices double. 7. Elasticity is –1.5 × (300)/1050 = –0.43. The parameter –1.5 is the coefficient of the demand relationship. 8. This problem should refer to Table 2. 5. The slope is –17.2, i.e. , the reduction in the amount of capital. © 2017 Taylor & Francis 9. As noted in Figure E2.2, the equilibrium price does not rise by as much as the tax. A firm will move up the MR curve by the amount of the tax, but this does not lead to an equal price increase. With a linear demand, the slope (P/Q) of the MR curve is twice the numerical value of the slope of the demand curve. Thus , the price increase will be 50% of the tax. 10. Qd = 1815 – 10 ps Qd = 2115 – 10 ps 11. An $8 increase in price to $30 is a percentage increase of (from a $22 base) 36.4 %. Using the formula Elasticity = % change in quantity / % change in price , this would lead to a decrease in quantity of –0.7 multiplied by 36.4 percent or –25.5 perc ent. Using the midpoint of the interval, the percentage change in price is 30.8 % and the quantity decrease is 21.5 percent.

Alle Vorteile der Zusammenfassungen von Stuvia auf einen Blick:

Garantiert gute Qualität durch Reviews

Garantiert gute Qualität durch Reviews

Stuvia Verkäufer haben mehr als 700.000 Zusammenfassungen beurteilt. Deshalb weißt du dass du das beste Dokument kaufst.

Schnell und einfach kaufen

Schnell und einfach kaufen

Man bezahlt schnell und einfach mit iDeal, Kreditkarte oder Stuvia-Kredit für die Zusammenfassungen. Man braucht keine Mitgliedschaft.

Konzentration auf den Kern der Sache

Konzentration auf den Kern der Sache

Deine Mitstudenten schreiben die Zusammenfassungen. Deshalb enthalten die Zusammenfassungen immer aktuelle, zuverlässige und up-to-date Informationen. Damit kommst du schnell zum Kern der Sache.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Was bekomme ich, wenn ich dieses Dokument kaufe?

Du erhältst eine PDF-Datei, die sofort nach dem Kauf verfügbar ist. Das gekaufte Dokument ist jederzeit, überall und unbegrenzt über dein Profil zugänglich.

Zufriedenheitsgarantie: Wie funktioniert das?

Unsere Zufriedenheitsgarantie sorgt dafür, dass du immer eine Lernunterlage findest, die zu dir passt. Du füllst ein Formular aus und unser Kundendienstteam kümmert sich um den Rest.

Wem kaufe ich diese Zusammenfassung ab?

Stuvia ist ein Marktplatz, du kaufst dieses Dokument also nicht von uns, sondern vom Verkäufer solutions. Stuvia erleichtert die Zahlung an den Verkäufer.

Werde ich an ein Abonnement gebunden sein?

Nein, du kaufst diese Zusammenfassung nur für 16,14 €. Du bist nach deinem Kauf an nichts gebunden.

Kann man Stuvia trauen?

4.6 Sterne auf Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

45.681 Zusammenfassungen wurden in den letzten 30 Tagen verkauft

Gegründet 2010, seit 14 Jahren die erste Adresse für Zusammenfassungen

Starte mit dem Verkauf
16,14 €
  • (0)
  Kaufen