Test bank For HRIR 2440 Chapter 8-13
13th Edition by Hermann Schwind
performance management - ANSthe continuing process of identifying, measuring, & developing
the performance of individuals and teams and aligning the performance with the strategic goals
of the organization
performance appraisal - ANSThe process by which organizations evaluate employee job
performance.
the the ideal Performance Management System does - ANSprovides incentives for employees
to concentrate on tasks that create the most value
two ways to link individual tasks to organizational goals - ANS1) cascading approach
2) Linking approach
cascading approach - ANSeach level develops goals for their level to meet the needs of the
level above them
pros and cons of the cascading approach - ANSpros: ensure a visual connection between work
and objectives
cons: timely to set up
linking up approach - ANSeach level clearly aligns their goals wit that of the top level
pros of the linking up approach - ANS-more meaningful goals
- clear line of sight
- fast to set up
balanced scoreboard - ANSa PM approach that looks at organizational learning and innovation,
financial mgmt, and customer management
purpose of performance appraisal - ANS1) guide admin decisions
2) Feedback & performance improvement
3) employee development and career planning
4) criteria for test validation
5) training program objectives
6) job redesign
what appraisals must be - ANSjob related or else they're invalid and unreliable
,to be considered job related, a performance appraisal must.. - ANSevaluate critical behaviours
that constitute positive job success
performance standards - ANSThe benchmarks against which performance is measured.
performance measures - ANSthe ratings used to evaluate employee performance
to be useful a performance measure must - ANS1) be easy to use
2) be reliable
3) report on critical behaviours
direct observation - ANSwhen the rater actually sees the performance
indirect observation - ANSwhen the rater can evaluate substitutes to actual performance
performance targets can be based on - ANS1) quality
2) quantity
3) time
comparative evaluation methods - ANSA collection of different methods that compare one
person's performance with that of co-workers.
two common comparative evaluation methods - ANS1) the ranking method
2) forced distributions
pros and cons of the ranking method - ANSpros: ease of explination and administration
cons: doesn't say by how much & subject to halo and recency bias
forced distribution method - ANSmethod of evaluating employees that requires rater to
categorize employees
Noncomparative evaluation - ANSevaluates employees according to present data, and not
comparing employees
different types of Noncomparative evaluation - ANS1) rating scales
2) behaviourally anchored rating scales
3) performance tests and observations
4) management by objectives
rating scales - ANSa scale that requires the rater to provide a subjective evaluation of an
individuals performance
pros and cons of rating scales - ANSpros: - inexpensive,
, - little training for raters
- can be used for lots of ppl
cons: - too much variation
- not always job related
Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS) - ANSA rating scale with specific behavioural
examples of good, average, and poor performance.
management by objectives - ANSrequires an employee and supervisor to jointly develop
performance goals for the future employees are then evaluated on how well they achieve these
measures
360-Degree Performance Appraisal - ANSCombination of self, peer, supervisor, and
subordinate performance evaluation.
360 degree feedback includes - ANS1) self
2) peer
3) direct report
4) customers
comparing rater errors - ANSpage 263
Evaluation Interview - ANSperformance review sessions that provide employees feedback
about their past performance or future potentials
different evaluation interview methods - ANS1) tell and sell approach
2) tell and listen
3) problem solving approach
tell and sell approach - ANSreview performance and try to convince them to perform better
tell and listen - ANSallows employees to explain their performance
problem solving approach - ANSidentifies problems interfereing with performance and uses
techniques to reslove them
options before firing an employee - ANS1) extend the performance improvement program
2) review and change goals
direct compensation - ANSwages paid to employees for the work they do
perceptions of fair pay are based on - ANS1) absolute pay
2) relative pay
Alle Vorteile der Zusammenfassungen von Stuvia auf einen Blick:
Garantiert gute Qualität durch Reviews
Stuvia Verkäufer haben mehr als 700.000 Zusammenfassungen beurteilt. Deshalb weißt du dass du das beste Dokument kaufst.
Schnell und einfach kaufen
Man bezahlt schnell und einfach mit iDeal, Kreditkarte oder Stuvia-Kredit für die Zusammenfassungen. Man braucht keine Mitgliedschaft.
Konzentration auf den Kern der Sache
Deine Mitstudenten schreiben die Zusammenfassungen. Deshalb enthalten die Zusammenfassungen immer aktuelle, zuverlässige und up-to-date Informationen. Damit kommst du schnell zum Kern der Sache.
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Was bekomme ich, wenn ich dieses Dokument kaufe?
Du erhältst eine PDF-Datei, die sofort nach dem Kauf verfügbar ist. Das gekaufte Dokument ist jederzeit, überall und unbegrenzt über dein Profil zugänglich.
Zufriedenheitsgarantie: Wie funktioniert das?
Unsere Zufriedenheitsgarantie sorgt dafür, dass du immer eine Lernunterlage findest, die zu dir passt. Du füllst ein Formular aus und unser Kundendienstteam kümmert sich um den Rest.
Wem kaufe ich diese Zusammenfassung ab?
Stuvia ist ein Marktplatz, du kaufst dieses Dokument also nicht von uns, sondern vom Verkäufer AllLegitExams. Stuvia erleichtert die Zahlung an den Verkäufer.
Werde ich an ein Abonnement gebunden sein?
Nein, du kaufst diese Zusammenfassung nur für 10,25 €. Du bist nach deinem Kauf an nichts gebunden.