Involves notes on:
- Caregiver-Infant Interactions
- Role of the Father
- Stages of Attachment
- Animal Studies - Lorenz and Harlow
- Explanations of Attachment
- Bowlby's Maternal Deprivation Theory
- Strange Situation
- Cultural Variations in Attachment
- Effects of Institutionalisation
...
Caregiver-Infant Interactions:
● Infancy: a period of a child’s life before speech begins, tending to refer to the child’s first year
of life
● Caregiver: any person who is providing care for a child, such as parent, grandparents, sibling,
other family member, childminder, and so on
● Attachment: an emotional bond between two people, usually a primary caregiver and a child
○ It is a two-way process that endures over time, leading to certain behaviours such as
clinging and proximity-seeking and serves the function of protecting an infant
● Why attachment is important:
○ Human babies are altricial, which means that they are born at a relatively early stage
of development
○ Humans are different to precocial animals - animals born at an advanced stage of
development, e.g. foals are able to walk and run soon after birth
● Reciprocity - refers to interaction flowing both ways between adult and infant (turn-taking),
e.g. a mother smiling back at a baby
○ This develops at a very early age - Feldman (2007) observed from 3 months of age
reciprocity increases in frequency due to increasing attention and response
sensitivities
○ Brazelton et al. (1975): mother-child interactions are like a ‘dance’ and form the
foundation for later attachment between caregivers and infant
● Interactional synchrony - when two people interact by mirroring facial and body movements
- including emotions
○ Can be seen as ‘imitation’ or ‘copying’ of the adult's behaviour
○ The child’s imitation of the caregiver’s actions is synchronised to sustain
communication between the two individuals
○ Meltzoff & Moore (1977) found infants as young as 2 to 3 weeks old imitated specific
facial and hand gestures (later studies showed it occurring in infants only 3 days old)
■ Aim: to examine interactional synchrony in infants
■ Method: using a controlled observation, an adult model displayed one of
three facial expressions or a hand gesture
● To start with, the child had a dummy placed in his/her mouth to
prevent a facial response
● Following the display from the adult model, the dummy was
removed and the child’s expressions were filmed
■ Results: there was a clear association between the infants’ behaviour and
that of the adult model
● Later research by Meltzoff & Moore (1983) found the same findings
in three-day-old infants
■ Conclusion: these findings suggest that interactional synchrony is innate and
reduces the strength of any claim that imitative behaviour is learned
, ○ Oostenbrook et al. (2016) tested 64 infants at 4 time periods → unlike other studies,
they made sure infants were undertaking the equivalent behaviour rather than one
of the range of behaviours that the researcher was exhibiting
■ The team found no evidence that babies can reliably imitate faces, actions,
or sounds → they suggest that the notion of innate imitation is not valid -
instead, imitation probably emerges around 6 months
● + Many observations involving caregiver interactions have shown the same patterns of
interaction
○ - However, we don’t know if the infants imitations are conscious or deliberate
● + Controlled observations capture fine details due to the amount of cameras → this means
the research has high validity
● + Infants do not know they are being observed, so can’t adjust their behaviour
○ - However, caregivers can adjust their behaviour
● - Feldman (2012) explains that synchrony and reciprocity simply describe behaviours that
happen at the same time - it doesn’t tell us their purpose
● + Some evidence says that reciprocal interaction and synchrony are helpful for mother-infant
attachments, stressful situations, developing empathy, language and morality
● + Supports the nature side of the nature vs nurture debate as imitating is an innate
behaviour
● Music and other therapists who work with parents & infants/children who have experienced
disruption in their attachment formation highlight the importance of reciprocity and
interactional synchrony in their therapeutic work
, Role of the Father:
● Then: breadwinners, no paternity leave, and industrialisation increased the rate of men
working away from home
● Now: the role of women has changed, same-sex families, paternity leave, antenatal
appointments, parental responsibilities
● Who do infants attach to → traditionally, mother-infant attachments
○ Schaffer and Emerson (1964) found that the majority of infants became attached at 7
months to their mother, with a second attachment forming a month later
■ In 3% of cases, the father was the primary attachment
■ In 27% of cases, the father was the joint attachment
■ By 18 months, 75% of infants had an attachment with their father
● Results deduced from infants protesting when their father walked
away - a sign of attachment
● Paquette (2004): fathers are more likely to engage in risk-taking physical play and enjoyable
games
● Lamb (1997): most infants prefer their fathers when they want to play but prefer their
mothers when they need comfort
● Ross et al. (1975): positive correlation between nappies changed and strength of attachment
● Caldera (2004) investigated 60 fathers and their 14-month infants and found that when the
father was involved in caregiving activities, they were likely to develop a strong attachment
● Field (1978) filmed 4-month infants in face-to-face interactions with primary and secondary
caregiver fathers → PC fathers spent more time smiling, imitating, and holding hands than SC
∴ fathers can be nurturing
● Grossman (2002) found that fathers as secondary attachments had a distinct role in their
child development involving play and stimulation
● MacCallum and Golombok (2004) found that infants in same-sex and single families don’t
develop any differently which suggests a father's role isn’t important
● Economic implications:
○ An increasing amount of fathers will remain at home and therefore contribute less to
the economy, but, more mothers may return to work and contribute to the economy,
balancing it out
○ Changing laws on paternity leave → government-funded so affects the economy;
impact upon employers
● Evaluation:
○ Researchers are interested in different research questions which produce different
results
■ - Some look at it as a secondary attachment & find fathers behave differently
■ + Those that look at primary attachments find that fathers can take on a
maternal role
○ - Traditional gender roles could make fathers feel like they shouldn’t act in a
nurturing way
○ - Oestrogen creates higher level of nurturing in females, thus women are
predisposed to be primary attachment figures
○ Social biases prevent objective observations → record expectations instead of reality
○ Mothers feel pressured to stay at home; research says it is vital for development
Alle Vorteile der Zusammenfassungen von Stuvia auf einen Blick:
Garantiert gute Qualität durch Reviews
Stuvia Verkäufer haben mehr als 700.000 Zusammenfassungen beurteilt. Deshalb weißt du dass du das beste Dokument kaufst.
Schnell und einfach kaufen
Man bezahlt schnell und einfach mit iDeal, Kreditkarte oder Stuvia-Kredit für die Zusammenfassungen. Man braucht keine Mitgliedschaft.
Konzentration auf den Kern der Sache
Deine Mitstudenten schreiben die Zusammenfassungen. Deshalb enthalten die Zusammenfassungen immer aktuelle, zuverlässige und up-to-date Informationen. Damit kommst du schnell zum Kern der Sache.
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Was bekomme ich, wenn ich dieses Dokument kaufe?
Du erhältst eine PDF-Datei, die sofort nach dem Kauf verfügbar ist. Das gekaufte Dokument ist jederzeit, überall und unbegrenzt über dein Profil zugänglich.
Zufriedenheitsgarantie: Wie funktioniert das?
Unsere Zufriedenheitsgarantie sorgt dafür, dass du immer eine Lernunterlage findest, die zu dir passt. Du füllst ein Formular aus und unser Kundendienstteam kümmert sich um den Rest.
Wem kaufe ich diese Zusammenfassung ab?
Stuvia ist ein Marktplatz, du kaufst dieses Dokument also nicht von uns, sondern vom Verkäufer parimahe. Stuvia erleichtert die Zahlung an den Verkäufer.
Werde ich an ein Abonnement gebunden sein?
Nein, du kaufst diese Zusammenfassung nur für 3,70 €. Du bist nach deinem Kauf an nichts gebunden.
