May 2020 History Extended Essay on why the Allies didn't bomb Auschwitz. Have a look if you're doing a history EE and need some ideas on structure or writing style.
Why wasn’t Auschwitz bombed by the Allies?
Subject: History
Word Count: 3989
Figure 1 Railway tracks leading to the camp entrance1
1
Lockhart, Keely. “Holocaust Memorial Day: Remembering the Horror of Auschwitz.” The Telegraph,
Telegraph Media Group, 27 Jan. 2016,
Personal code: gpz105
, 1
Contents Page
Page 2-3 Introduction
Page 3-4 Bombing of Auschwitz
Page 4-7 Allied intelligence on Auschwitz
Page 7-10 Was Bombing Auschwitz feasible
Page 11-13 Usefulness of a raid
Page 13-14 Conclusion
Page 15 Appendix
Page 16 Bibliography
Personal code: gpz105
, 2
Introduction
The Research question of this extended essay is “Why wasn’t Auschwitz bombed by the
Allies”. The perspectives of revisionist historians such as David Wyman are important as they assert that
Allied leaders abandoned the Jews by rejecting their pleas to bomb Auschwitz, despite being aware of the
atrocities taking place. These serious accusations have prompted historical investigations from both
revisionist and orthodox camps, culminating in evidence on both sides. Whilst revisionist historians raise
critical points about the Allies’ reticence to bomb non-military targets and limited Allied intelligence,
orthodox views argue that the inefficiency of Allied bombing and likely Allied and Jewish casualties
would make the operation unproductive. This investigation will address the Allies’ decision not to bomb
Auschwitz by examining the available intelligence, the feasibility of bombing Auschwitz and usefulness
of a raid based on a synthesises from Martin Gilbert's “Auschwitz and the Allies” and Bernard
Wasserstein’s “Britain and the Jews of Europe”. Both authors have access to Churchills diaries, private
correspondence between Allied leaders, and government archives and therefore provide insightful
examination of the research question.
This research question is worthy of study because a conclusion of negligence could challenge the
traditional narrative of the virtuous and honourable Allied victory over Nazi Germany. The suggestion
that Churchill and Roosevelt – respectively two of the most beloved leaders in their nations’ history –
Personal code: gpz105
, 3
would wilfully neglect the lives of 1.1 million people might seem unimaginable. It is worth questioning
the established historical record, as it is commonly said that “history is written by the victors”, suggesting
that the history books may have downplayed the victors’ role in the Holocaust.
Bombing Of Auschwitz
Auschwitz was a series of concentration camps operated from 1940 to 1945 by the SS, where
2
they facilitated the murder of over 1.1 million Jews . Requests to bomb the camp were first issued by
Jewish Rabbi Dov Weissmandel in August of 19443, who beseeched Allied leaders to halt the cruel
killings and mass deportations of Hungarian Jews by bombing Auschwitz’s gas chambers, crematoriums
and the railway lines leading up to the camp. Regrettably, the lack of Allied response has led to
considerable controversy. This historiographical debate was first addressed by historian David Wyman in
a 1979 New York Times article entitled “Why Auschwitz Wasn't Bombed”. It was the first time that a
historian had openly reflected negatively on Allied efforts to combat mass execution of European Jews in
1944, affording the public with a new perspective on how Allied governments including Churchill’s and
may have mishandled some aspects of the war. In this capacity it remains a widely discussed example of
a missed opportunity by the Allies, Churchill, and his government to disrupt the mass execution of Jews
by Nazi Germany.
Allied Intelligence on Auschwitz
2
Van Pelt, Robert. [2002]. “The Case for Auschwitz: Evidence from the Irving Trial,” pp.106
3
“Bombing Auschwitz.” Auschwitz and the Allies, by Martin Gilbert, Simon & Schuster, 2011, pp. 217.
Personal code: gpz105
Alle Vorteile der Zusammenfassungen von Stuvia auf einen Blick:
Garantiert gute Qualität durch Reviews
Stuvia Verkäufer haben mehr als 700.000 Zusammenfassungen beurteilt. Deshalb weißt du dass du das beste Dokument kaufst.
Schnell und einfach kaufen
Man bezahlt schnell und einfach mit iDeal, Kreditkarte oder Stuvia-Kredit für die Zusammenfassungen. Man braucht keine Mitgliedschaft.
Konzentration auf den Kern der Sache
Deine Mitstudenten schreiben die Zusammenfassungen. Deshalb enthalten die Zusammenfassungen immer aktuelle, zuverlässige und up-to-date Informationen. Damit kommst du schnell zum Kern der Sache.
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Was bekomme ich, wenn ich dieses Dokument kaufe?
Du erhältst eine PDF-Datei, die sofort nach dem Kauf verfügbar ist. Das gekaufte Dokument ist jederzeit, überall und unbegrenzt über dein Profil zugänglich.
Zufriedenheitsgarantie: Wie funktioniert das?
Unsere Zufriedenheitsgarantie sorgt dafür, dass du immer eine Lernunterlage findest, die zu dir passt. Du füllst ein Formular aus und unser Kundendienstteam kümmert sich um den Rest.
Wem kaufe ich diese Zusammenfassung ab?
Stuvia ist ein Marktplatz, du kaufst dieses Dokument also nicht von uns, sondern vom Verkäufer sebastiancasse. Stuvia erleichtert die Zahlung an den Verkäufer.
Werde ich an ein Abonnement gebunden sein?
Nein, du kaufst diese Zusammenfassung nur für 0,00 €. Du bist nach deinem Kauf an nichts gebunden.
