100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Assignment 2 King Lear $7.49
Add to cart

Essay

Assignment 2 King Lear

 15 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Assignment 2 King Lear

Preview 2 out of 6  pages

  • March 1, 2021
  • 6
  • 2020/2021
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A
avatar-seller
1
The Shakespeare Industry

21 September 2020

1363 words

Assignment 2

Editor

What makes the manuscript of The Play of Sir Thomas More special, and relevant to

Shakespeareans?

The manuscript of The Play of Sir Thomas More was a handwritten manuscript written in black in

which in the course of the following four centuries had rusted, and was discovered in the 20th

century. But that is not the most important thing about this manuscript, especially since that does

not explain its relevance to Shakespeareans. This manuscript of Sir Thomas More’s Play was

namely presumed to be written by William Shakespeare. The main reason why this manuscript is so

precious to Shakespeareans is that it is pretty much the only thing that exists in Shakespeare’s

handwriting, especially when it came to literary works. The only other things that have been found

containing Shakespeare’s handwriting are some minor court documents.1



What, in editorial terms, is meant by “blotting”? What do we know about Shakespeare

and “blotting”?

Blotting is the act of revising, adding on to and deleting parts of a text that has been written either

by the author or by others. During Shakespeare’s lifetime but also in the eras after Shakespeare,

there has been a tradition which said that Shakespeare never blotted. Shakespeare was seen as a

natural poet who was able to write things down perfectly and did not have to revise or rewrite them.

Shakespeare was seen as the greatest of all time; this is why some insist that he did not blot, or that

there was scarcely a blot in his works because a genius does not blot. This idea, however, is in fact,

wrong as Shakespeare did blot, and Shakespeare did revise his plays.2


1 All information retrieved from Hoenselaars. “Shakespeare and his Editors.”
2 All information retrieved from Hoenselaars. “Shakespeare and his Editors.”

, 2



What is the Hinman Collator? How did it come to be developed? How has it

revolutionised work in the field of editorial studies?

The Hinman Collator was invented during the Second World War by Shakespeare scholar Hinman.

Hinman was in the military where he was introduced to a machine that compared before and after

bombardment photos by putting them on top of each other to see if they had missed something

during the bombing. The Hinman Collator worked in a similar way. One version of the play was put

on the left of the proofreader, and the other was put on the right side, both versions were filmed

then put on top of each other and projected as one slide. The great innovation in this was that you

could now tell where things had changed immediately, meaning that you did not have to read the

entire play in order to find the errors. This new method was way more time-efficient.3



What is so special about the Oxford Edition of Shakespeare of 1986, edited by Stanley

Wells and Gary Taylor?

There was a belief in English literary history which believed that Shakespeare was a poet and not a

playwright. Working in the theatre was not the right place for Shakespeare, and the theatre led to his

texts to be corrupted; the theatre was seen as a corruption to the texts produced by this natural poet.

When the Oxford Edition of Shakespeare of 1986 appeared though, it was claimed that this belief

was prejudice and that playwrights should not be seen as less than poets. The Oxford Edition treated

Shakespeare as a playwright that revised his plays to suit altered circumstances, unlike the natural

poet who never blotted. The Oxford Edition did look at the Folio, which earlier traditions rejected

because the Folio texts supposedly corrupted Shakespeare. The Oxford Edition rejects this idea and

claims that the Folio actually captures Shakespeare’s intervention rather than that they corrupt his

interventions.




3 All information retrieved from Hoenselaars. “Shakespeare and his Editors.”

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller artsy_cici. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53068 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.49
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added