100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Research seminar public international law - Assignment 2 $3.20
Add to cart

Essay

Research seminar public international law - Assignment 2

 28 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Research seminar public international law - Assignment 2 Topic: The immunities of high-ranking State officials Grade: 7,5

Preview 2 out of 10  pages

  • March 7, 2021
  • 10
  • 2020/2021
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • 8-9
avatar-seller
Assignment 2




Assignment 2: The immunities of high-ranking State officials

Name: ….


Student number: ….


Date: 5 May 2020


Course: Research Seminar International Law (working group 3)


Lecturer: Dr A. Tsampi.


Word count: 1200 words (excluding front-page, footnotes and bibliography)

, Immunities of high-ranking State officials before the ICC: Non-party states

On 31 March 2005 the Security Council (SC) made its first referral to the International
Criminal Court (ICC) by referring the situation in Darfur to the prosecutor of the ICC.
President Al-Bashir of Sudan was the first sitting head of State ever indicted by the ICC.1 In
2009, a Pre-Trial Chamber of the ICC issued an arrest warrant for Al-Bashir.2 Al-Bashir has
since visited various countries, all of which refused to arrest and surrender him to the ICC.
The main reason given as justification was that he possesses immunities under international
law as a Head of State. This legal advice focusses on whether the immunities of nationals
from States that are not party to the Rome Statute (Statute) can be invoked before the ICC.



No immunities before the ICC
Article 27(2) of the Statute states that the Statute shall apply to all persons without any
distinction based on official capacity.3 This provision eliminates both immunity rationae
materiae4 and immunity ratione personae5 attached to the state officials irrespective of their
capacity.6


Article 98(1) of the Statute confirms the customary international immunities of high-ranking
state officials,7 while Article 98(2) reaffirms that the ICC may not request a state party to
surrender someone to the ICC in violation of immunities provided in an agreement with a
third state.8


In the Arrest Warrant case, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) stated that:

1
International Criminal Court, ‘Darfur, Sudan’ ICC-02/05 <https://www.icc-cpi.int/darfur> accessed on 1 May 2020.
2
Warrant of Arrest for Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir, issued on 4 March 2009, Pre-Trial Chamber I, ICC-02/05-01/09.
3
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (adopted 17 July 1998, entered into force 1 July 2002) ISBN No. 92-
9227-227-6 (ICCRSt), art 27(2).
4
The scope of the immunity ratione materiae determines the categories of acts covered by the immunity, as mentioned in the
Opinion by Legal Advisory Committee to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland on immunities of State
officials from foreign criminal jurisdiction (2015), 3.
5
Immunity Ratione personae attaches to certain office holders during their term of office in order to protect the individual
concerned against any act of authority of another State which would hinder him or her in the performance of his or her duties,
so it defines the person covered by the immunity, as mentioned in Rosanne van Alebeek, ‘Functional Immunity of State
Officials from the Criminal Jurisdiction of Foreign National Courts’ in Tom Ruys, Nicolas Angelet and Luca Ferro (eds), The
Cambridge Handbook of Immunities and International Law (CUP 2019) 496.
6
Fred Nkusi, ‘Immunity of State Officials before the International Criminal Court (ICC): The Indictment of President Al-
Bashir’ (2013) 1(1) Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 1, 4.
7
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (adopted 17 July 1998, entered into force 1 July 2002) ISBN No. 92-
9227-227-6 (ICCRSt), art 98(1).
8
Erika de Wet, ‘The Implications of President Al-Bashir’s Visit to South Africa for International and Domestic Law’ (2015)
13(5) Journal of International Criminal Justice (JICJ) 1049, 1055.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller studentrechten1200. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.20. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53068 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.20  1x  sold
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added