100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Overview of Studies Marketing Communications $5.35   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Overview of Studies Marketing Communications

 56 views  5 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

This document contains an overview of the studies that are discussed in the lectures of Marketing Communications, with the main points you should know for the exam: variables, hypotheses, figures, main results, conclusions, etc.

Preview 2 out of 15  pages

  • March 22, 2021
  • 15
  • 2020/2021
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Marketing Communication
Overview of studies
Lecture 2: Breaking through the Advertising Clutter

Study – Self-Referencing and Recall (Burnkrant & Unnava, 1995)
 RQ: What is the effect of second-person wording (you) and third-person wording (it) on recall
and attitude?
 Design:
o You statements (you all know that…)
o It statements (It’s well-known that…)
o You questions
o It questions
 IV:
o Statements (you vs. it)
o Questions (you vs. it)
 DV:
o Recall
o Attitude
 Results:
o Using ‘it’ statements result in less recall than using ‘you’
statements
o When you approach people personally, they often
remember more information
o You can capture more attention when asking questions
 Notes:
o Focus on statements and recall in the lecture

Study – Dual Coding Theory: verbal and visual information (Burnkrant & Unnava, 1991)
 RQ: What is the effect of combining imagery text and pictures on ad recall?
 Design: 2 level of imagery (high vs. low) by 2 picture (present vs. absent)
4 ad manipulations:
o High imagery / Picture absent
o High imagery / Picture present
o Low imagery / Picture absent
o Low imagery / Picture present
o Example high imagery: “Picture a child’s shiny face, happy smile, and dancing eyes as
he blows out his first birthday candle. The light of the candle is enough for the
Digitron camcorder.”
o Example low imagery: “A Digitron camcorder performs very well under low light
conditions. With its new filters and lenses, a light as dim as a candle is enough.”
 IV:
o Level of imagery (high vs. low)
o Picture (absent vs. present)
 DV:
o Recall


1

,  Results:
o People can get confused when you tell them to imagine something and also show a
picture. There could be discrepancy between the picture and the imagination.
o You should not use imagery and visual ads together

Study – Encoding Variability: attention with dual-task paradigm (Unnava & Burnkrant, 1991)
 RQ: Do varied executions of ads enhance recall compared to same execution of ads?
 Design: 2 group design (2 similar ads OR 2 different ads)
o One group sees 2 similar ads of a fictious brand on the 6 th and 16th position
o One group sees 2 different ads of a fictious brand on the 6 th and 16th position
o Booklet with 30 ads
o With dual-task paradigm. Next to looking at an ad, subjects get a second task to
measure reaction time: press the button when you hear a beep. The more attention
to the ad, the less attention goes to the second task.
 IV:
o Ad execution (similar ads vs. different ads)
 DV:
o Attention
o Brand recall
o Message recall
 Results
o No effect on attention
o Brand recall: 28% on same ad executions vs. 55% on different ad executions
o Message recall: 1.53 for same ad executions vs. 2.83 on different ad executions
o Encoding variability (more memory traces) lead to higher recall

Lecture 3: Persuasion and Pre-Suasion

Study – Matching executional styles (Petty, Cacioppo & Schumann, 1983)
 RQ: System 2 people are more persuaded by strong quality arguments and for people in
system 1 the use of a celebrity can be important to persuade.
 Design: 2 involvement (low vs. high) x 2 argument quality (weak vs. strong) x 2 cue (celebrity
vs. noncelebrity status).
 IV:
o Involvement: toothpaste (low involvement) vs. disposable razors (high involvement)
o Involvement: brand would become available in other areas (low involvement) vs.
own area (high involvement)
o Argument quality: “scientifically designed” (+5 strong arguments) vs. “designed for
beauty” (+5 weak arguments)
o Cue: “professional athletes agree” + picture of 2 well-liked celebs (celebrity status)
vs. “Bakersfield, California agrees” + picture of average citizen (noncelebrity status)

 DV: attitudes
o Attitudes, recall and recognition
 Results:
o Involvement X cue (on attitude): Famous
endorsers lead to better attitudes with low

2

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller SandersStudiesucces. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $5.35. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

70055 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$5.35  5x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart