2. Referring to the section ‘Findings’ on page 497, discuss how NHS Wales evaluates the level of implementation of sustainable practices according to the triple bottom line.
2. Referring to the section ‘Findings’ on page 497, discuss how NHS Wales evaluates
the level of implementation of sustainable practices according to the triple bottom
line.
Primarily, NHS wales promote suitable procurement potential, though; preferable
procurement appraisal scheme and the competent peril gauging template. Impressively, NHS
wales have inaugurated a new template technique in which products are required to be attested as
morally sourced, for instance, those certified by Fair-Trade Labeling Organization (Bloomfield,
2015 p.558). According to the article, NHS wales gauged the degree of suitable practice by
inspecting the rate at which the running system and procurers amalgamated external
environmental, financial and social dimensions in promotion of preferable practices. The
evaluation involved non-clinical, clinical, and medical groups of public procurers to analyze the
suitability of the procurement.
First, regarding the environmental factor, findings exhibited that the clinical
procurers attained the first position, followed by non-clinical and medical groups that earned
similar grades. Notably, the exanimation was conducted after creating awareness of the entailed
survey groups for accurate findings. Second, NHS wales survey groups had less idea about
Minority and Women-Owned Business (MWOB) purchase concerning social factors. Besides,
inspection on purchase from smaller and local suppliers attained lower grades in terms of the
social element. In fact, in the local suppliers' category, the non-clinical group was the highest
with a minimal score, followed by other groups that had a similar rating.
On the other hand, in small suppliers’ rank, the medical group was the leading, followed by non-
clinical and clinical groups, respectively. Notably, the environmental dimension was considered
more potent in comparison to the social aspect. This is in agreement with Lindgreen et al. (2009
p. 128) that laws and mandates in consortium with environmental maintenance are obligatory;
however, social rules are optional and voluntary.
Third, the non-clinical group considers the capital factor as the most important,
whereas the clinical group finds it least necessary. In detail, regarding the economic factor, the
supplier's location portrayed that the non-clinical group of procurers had the best percentage
followed by the medicine group then clinical group systematically. Correspondingly, Work with
the Third Sector organization had a significant score as the clinical group achieved the least in
this economic sector being overdone by the medical and non-clinical group being the best.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Gbush001. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.75. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.