Essay
LP 1.2-4.2: Methodisch werken
Ik heb voor het verslag Methodisch werken een 7 gehaald.
[Show more]
Preview 4 out of 32 pages
Uploaded on
March 28, 2021
Number of pages
32
Written in
2020/2021
Type
Essay
Professor(s)
Unknown
Grade
7-8
Institution
Saxion Hogeschool (Saxion)
Education
Social Work
Course
Methodisch Werken (T.46691)
All documents for this subject (31)
By: bartmasselink • 3 year ago
By: myrtheendeman • 3 year ago
Translated by Google
How annoying that you only give the document one star. May I ask what you didn't like about it?
$6.95
100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached
METHODISCH WERKEN
Studenten: Myrthe en Elles Docent: Eva
Datum: 1 juli 2020
,Inhoudsopgave
INLEIDING................................................................................................................................................................................ 3
CRITERIUM 1: BALANSMODEL VAN BAKKER............................................................................................................................. 4
1.1 MICRO SYSTEEM: KIND-, OUDER- EN GEZINSFACTOREN..........................................................................................................................4
1.2 MESOSYSTEEM: SOCIALE (GEZINS- EN BUURT)FACTOREN........................................................................................................................5
1.3 MACROFACTOREN: SOCIAALECONOMISCHE GEZINS-, CULTURELE EN MAATSCHAPPELIJKE FACTOREN...............................................................5
1.4 ANALYSE BALANSMODEL VAN BAKKER................................................................................................................................................6
CRITERIUM 2: DE SCREENINGSINSTRUMENTEN........................................................................................................................ 7
2.1 OPVOEDINGS BELASTING VRAGENLIJST................................................................................................................................................7
2.2 SDQ-DUT VRAGENLIJST...................................................................................................................................................................7
2.3 ECOGRAM......................................................................................................................................................................................7
2.4 EMPOWERMENT VRAGENLIJST...........................................................................................................................................................8
CRITERIUM 3: PROBLEEMANALYSE.......................................................................................................................................... 9
3.1 HOOFDPROBLEEM...........................................................................................................................................................................9
3.2 DEELPROBLEMEN.............................................................................................................................................................................9
3.3 HULPVRAAG.................................................................................................................................................................................10
CRITERIUM 4: HULPVERLENINGSDOELEN............................................................................................................................... 11
4.1 GEFORMULEERDE DOELEN...............................................................................................................................................................11
4.1.1 Microniveau......................................................................................................................................................................11
4.1.2 Mesoniveau......................................................................................................................................................................11
4.1.3 Macroniveau.....................................................................................................................................................................11
4.2 DOELEN VANUIT DRIE INVALSHOEKEN ............................................................................................................................................12
4.2.1 Normatieve invalshoek ....................................................................................................................................................12
4.2.2 Instrumentele invalshoek .................................................................................................................................................12
4.2.3 Persoonlijke invalshoek ....................................................................................................................................................13
CRITERIUM 5: METHODEN EN INTERVENTIES......................................................................................................................... 14
5.1 DOELEN VAN MERLE......................................................................................................................................................................14
5.2 TERREINEN DIE SPECIFIEKE AANDACHT VERDIENEN...............................................................................................................................14
5.3 METHODIEKEN, METHODEN EN ACTIVITEITEN.....................................................................................................................................15
5.4 SAMENWERKING /AFSTEMMING.......................................................................................................................................................15
5.5 BEOOGDE TIJDSDUUR EN FREQUENTIE HULPVERLENING........................................................................................................................16
5.6 EVALUATIEMOMENTEN...................................................................................................................................................................16
CRITERIUM 6: AFSLUITING EN EVALUATIE.............................................................................................................................. 17
6.1 PRODUCTEVALUATIE .................................................................................................................................................................. 17
6.1.1 Nederlandse Empowerment Vragenlijst...........................................................................................................................17
6.1.2 Opvoedings Belasting Vragenlijst.....................................................................................................................................17
6.1.3 SDQ-Dut Vragenlijst..........................................................................................................................................................17
6.1.4 Ecogram............................................................................................................................................................................17
6.2 PROCESEVALUATIE .....................................................................................................................................................................18
CRITERIUM 7: ZELFEVALUATIE................................................................................................................................................ 18
7.1 INVALSHOEKEN MYRTHE .............................................................................................................................................................18
7.1.1 Normatieve invalshoek.....................................................................................................................................................19
7.1.2 Instrumentele invalshoek .................................................................................................................................................19
7.1.3 Persoonlijke invalshoek.....................................................................................................................................................19
7.2 INVALSHOEKEN ELLES.....................................................................................................................................................................20
7.2.1 Normatieve invalshoek.....................................................................................................................................................20
7.2.2 Instrumentele invalshoek .................................................................................................................................................20
7.2.3 Persoonlijke invalshoek.....................................................................................................................................................20
1
,CRITERIUM 8: PLANCYCLUS VANUIT PRAKTIJKSITUATIE.......................................................................................................... 22
8.1 STAGEOMSCHRIJVING MYRTHE........................................................................................................................................................22
8.2 STAGEOMSCHRIJVING ELLES............................................................................................................................................................24
LITERATUURLIJST .................................................................................................................................................................. 26
BIJLAGEN............................................................................................................................................................................... 28
BIJLAGE 1: OPVOEDINGSBELASTING VRAGENLIJST.....................................................................................................................................28
BIJLAGE 2: DE SDQ-DUT VRAGENLIJST BIJLAGE 3: ECOGRAM DATABANK MOVISIE.......................................................................................29
BIJLAGE 4: NEDERLANDSE EMPOWERMENT VRAGENLIJST...........................................................................................................................30
2
, Inleiding
In dit verslag is de casus van Merle uitgewerkt. Aan de hand van de fasen van de methodische plancyclus van Snellen
is de casus beschreven. Onderdelen uit de casus zijn aan de hand van de theorie op micro-, meso-, en macroniveau
beschreven. Uit de verzamelde informatie hebben wij als jeugdconsulent een probleemanalyse opgesteld.
Vervolgens zijn er hulpverleningsdoelen geformuleerd welke passen deze bij de hulpvraag van Merle. Verder is er
gereflecteerd vanuit de normatieve, persoonlijke en instrumentele invalshoeken a.d.h.v. de casus Merle en onze
eigen ontwikkeling binnen praktijkleren.
3