→ Why look at institutions (not all about member states?)
1. Neorealist view (state-centric approach)
- IR view
- downplays the role of institutions
- ‘ False promise of IO’s
- Focus on what nations do
- Rescue of the nation-state ( Mearsheimer)
→ ‘EU is another way to ensure that member state is at
forefront of all actions’
2. Institutional approach ( Argues that institutions matter)
→ why look at institutions?
- Also, have an impact on how states see their preferences
- Altering state preferences
- Altering power structure
- providing normative environments
→ Treaty 13
- Stipulates what the commission is all about
- ‘ The union shall have an institutional framework
Aim to promote its values it’s advance its objectives serve its interests those
of its citizens and those of the member state + continuity and efficiency
→ The EU institutions:
1. EU parliament
2. EU council
3. The council
4. The commission
5. Court of justice
6. Court of auditors
-
1
,⇒ Controlling bodies: Court of justice + Court of auditors
⇒ Financial bodies: Central bank
→ The commission purpose/ function :
‘ The commission shall ‘promote general EU interest’
1. Guardian of treaties and legal framework
- The task of monitoring the application of EU primary and secondary laws
ensuring its uniform application throughout the EU
- Gather information to monitor EU countries compliance
- Association with Eu courts and commission
- firms breaking EU laws
- Oversees member states
⇒ What happens when EU countries don’t comply?
⇒ Formal procedure:
→ The commission may send it a letter of ‘formal notice’ allows Eu
country to submit its observation
→ If the commission is still of the opinion that the violation of the EU
rules persist
→ sends reasoned opinion to the EU country
-
2
, → If opinion remains without effect
→ The commission may bring the case before the court of EU ( 258)
( decisions legally binding)
⇒ Second court procedure:
- The court may impose a financial penalty
⇒ First judgment:
- Impose financial sanctions ( already when passing first judgments)
⇒ Any individual or entity may also lodge a complaint with the commission if a
measure / administrative practice in an EU country appears to violate EU rules.
→ However, only the Commission that may initiate the procedure
under Articles 258 and 260 TFEU ( so bring the case in front of the court)
⇒ Causes of infringements (noncompliance)
1. Late or non transposition
2. Wrong application of treaties
● Commissioners gives higher priorities to theses (preferences)
⇒ Softer way of monitoring:
1. Informal meetings
2. Guidance
3. communication
4. social pressure (naming and sharing)
→ Who is afraid of commissions
= Firms
⇒ Laws actions against firms:
( Number of rules to ensure fair play)
⇒ Managing front line policy implementation
supervisor and overseer of EU policies
1. Breaching(making breakthrough) EU law on restrictive practices and abuse of
dominant market positions
Eg: EU imposed fines on google → Fines on using monopoly to
dominate the market
2. Breaching EU law on state aid
Eg: Republic or Ireland gave illagal tax benefits to Applle → Ireland
fined
3. Breaching EU law on company mergers
-
3
, - Merge decision: If more than one company wants to become one new
‘merged company’
→ EU rule cant abuse market positions
⇒ EU has prohibited Siemens and Alstom merge
→ The merger would have harmed competition in markets ( for
railways and high speed)
2. Rights of initiative (can propose a law) & EU legal instruments:
- Commission has a right of initiative when it comes to most of the EU law
- The commission comes with a proposal → goes through the law-making
procedure → Council and the EP have to approve
- given rule power making
- grey area: policy overlaps with administration
- exercising rulemaking power not to be independent of the council
⇒ EU legal instruments:
= Secondary laws
REGULATIONS: directly and immediately binding in their entirety (often rules of
procedure or technical standards)
- don’t have to be changed into national law
- process of regulating rules
- Eg: EU regulations on fishing
DIRECTIVES: binding in terms of goals, but the states may decide how to achieve
those goals
(often future objectives or harmonization (the process of creating common standards
across the internal market )
- Has to be changed into national law
- official instructions
- Eg: Working time
DECISIONS: binding but targeted at specific member states, individuals or
institutions
RECOMMENDATIONS: not binding
OPINIONS: not binding
-
4
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller salmamataich. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.86. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.