100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
College aantekeningen Thinking About Art I: Philopshy Of Art (LWX011P05) $6.51   Add to cart

Class notes

College aantekeningen Thinking About Art I: Philopshy Of Art (LWX011P05)

 5 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

My notes of all lectures and some seminars, made during the lessons and using the powerpoints

Preview 2 out of 12  pages

  • April 5, 2021
  • 12
  • 2020/2021
  • Class notes
  • Dr. lijster
  • All classes
avatar-seller
LECTURE 1 Hume and Kant (1/2)

What is philosophy?
- Asking questions (about everything in life, the non-physical)
- No specific method, no fixed way of ‘how to do philosophy’.
- Questioning answers rather than answering questions.
- Everything is up for debate

- Meta-level of asking questions
- All sciences ask questions, but philosophers question the concepts / presuppositions
of other sciences: What is law? / what is nature?
- Different branches: philosophy of science, of art, ethics, etc.

Philosophers ask questions in order to:
- Find the ‘essence’
- Lay bare presumptions (rethink our common sense)
- Analyze concepts and argumentations

Methods:
- Conceptual analysis / text analysis
- Developing new concepts
- Rational argumentation
- Debate

Sources of philosophy:
- Tradition
- Science
- Public sphere

What is philosophy of art?
- Thinking about / questioning art and its concepts.
- Relation to art history / art criticism
- In philosophy, art becomes increasingly important

Is beauty in the eye of the beholder?
Hume and Kant on beauty and taste

Problem of taste
- Are judgments if taste merely subjective and / or individual?

Enlightenment
- The questioning about traditions and used concepts
- “Have the courage to use your own reason” (Kant)
- Challenging authority: power and knowledge
- What is the foundation of our ideas of truth / goodness / beauty

, Traditional vs. modern aesthetics
- Quarrel between the ancients and the moderns: should we copy the ancient
traditions or can we find new rules of beauty and art.
- How do we legitimize our judgments of taste?
- Rationalism vs. empiricism
- Baumgarten:
- To say something is beautiful is actually to say something is perfect.
- Aesthetics as the science of beauty
- Beauty has a mathematical / scientific explanation.
- Rule- or concepts-based aesthetics.

Hume and Kant
- Problem with rationalist approach
- You do not have to know what something is, in order to call it beautiful.
- Beauty is a feeling not a concept.
- Problem of Hume and Kant: judgements of taste are expressions of (subjective)
feeling … but does this make them completely arbitrary and/or individual?

David Hume
- ‘of the standard of taste’
- Following problem / paradox:
1. Judgments of taste are expressions of a sentiment (or feeling)
2. A sentiment can never be false/wrong (or misplaced)
3. Some judgments of taste are clearly more valid or valuable than others.
 two of these statements can be true at the same time, but not all three!

- Standards of taste is what critics/experts have agreed on
- Aesthetic judgments depend on the agreement / recognition of others.


LECTURE 2 Immanuel Kant on beauty / taste (8/2)

Immanuel Kant (1724/1804)
- Beyond rationalism and empiricism
- Knowledge is not a mere reflection of the world, but it’s a construction of the mind.
- Three critiques:
1. Critique of pure reason: how can we legitimize logical and scientific
judgments?
2. Critique of practical reason: how can we legitimize moral judgments?
3. Critique of judgment: how can we legitimize aesthetic judgments.

Judgment
- “judgment in general is the ability to think the particular under the universal.”
-  being able to label things: ‘this is a dog’.
- A judgment involves the interrelation between our imagination and understanding.
- Our mind subsumes intuitions / objects (of the imagination / perception) under
concepts (of the understanding).

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller hannahfoessel. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $6.51. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

76747 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$6.51
  • (0)
  Add to cart