Essay
Key studies in UNIT 2
- Course
- Institution
- Book
AO3 evaluation essays for key studies in UNIT 2 - clinical and crime -rosenhan -Carlsson -Loftus and palmer -Mesout and valentine
[Show more]
Connected book
Book Title:
Author(s):
- Edition:
- ISBN:
- Edition:
More summaries for
-
Exemplar 20 mark essays for Issues and Debates in psychology
-
Exemplar 20 mark essays for clinical psychology
-
Exemplar 8 mark essays for cognitive psychology
Seller
Follow
seinebabbas
Reviews received
Content preview
KEY STUDIES IN PSYCHOLOGYUNIT 2 CLINICAL CLASSIC STUDY: ROSENHAN (1973):
AIM – to find out whether mental health professional could distinguish between those who were
genuinely mentally ill and those who were not.
PROCEDURE – The study was a field experiment and a participant observation. It took place in 12
psychiatric hospitals varying in size and location. The sample was 8 pseudo patients , 5 men and 3
women, from different occupations: a painter, housewife, and psychologists including Rosenhan.
None were ever diagnosed with a mental illness (opportunity sampling). Pseudo patients called
mental hospitals complaining of hearing voices and the words ‘empty’ ‘thud’ and ‘hollow’. 7 pseudo
patients admitted with schizophrenia and 1 admitted with manic depression and psychosis. They
acted normally with both staff and genuine patients, accepted but did not take medication given to
them and did not report any more symptoms. Observed the behaviour of staff and took notes
gathering both qualitative and quantitative data. Follow up study took place in another hospital after
staff asked Rosenhan to send more pseudo patients over a period of three months, claiming they
would notice if they were fake patients. Rosenhan did not actually send any pseudo patients.
RESULTS – Pseudo patients hospitalised between 7 and 52 days prior to being considered sane
enough to be discharged. No doctors/nurses questioned their genuineness, but some patients
thought they may have been journalists. No staff answered pseudo patients’ questions in 4/12
hospitals. 71% doctors and 88% nurses and other staff ignored pseudo patient when questioned.
Normal behaviour interpreted as abnormal eg. note writing = engaged in writing behaviour, pacing =
nervousness when patient was actually bored. Follow up study: 41/193 cases identified as fake and
23 suspected as fake by psychiatrist but Rosenhan sent no pseudo patients.
CONCLUSION – Mental health professionals cannot distinguish. Between real and false patients,
willing to make diagnosis based on fake symptoms. Normal behaviour misinterpreted as abnormal to
support their idea of pseudo patients having illness. Suggests validity of diagnoses was low, but
consistency of diagnosis shows they are reliable but incorrect.
(+) HIGH INTERNAL VALIDITY AND ETHICAL (-) DECEPTION AND ETHNOCENTRIC
UNIT 2 CRIME CLASSIC STUDY: LOFTUS AND PALMER (1974):
AIM: to investigate whether leading questions would influence the estimates of the speed of a
vehicle among eyewitnesses.
PROCEDURE EXPERIMENT 1: a total of 45 students were shown 7 short film clips of a traffic accident.
After each film clip, participants were asked to give an account of the accident they had seen and
were then given a questionnaire and asked to answer specific questions about the accident. The
length of the film clips ranged from 5 to 30 seconds. All participants received the same questionnaire
with the exception of one critical question that was changed. One group of 9 participants were asked
the critical question ‘about how fast were the cars going when they hit each other?’ The remaining 4
groups of 9 participants were asked the same question but with the verb ‘hit’ changed to ‘smashed’
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller seinebabbas. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.14. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
56326 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now