Select a case from the Case/Citation table below. This is an individual assignment. You must write and submit an individual paper. Your response should be well-rounded and analytical and should not just provide a conclusion or an opinion without explaining the reason for the choice. For full credit...
legal political and ethical dimensions of business
Connected book
Book Title:
Author(s):
Edition:
ISBN:
Edition:
More summaries for
The Legal and Ethical Environment of Business, Lau - Exam Preparation Test Bank (Downloadable Doc)
MGMT520: Week 8: Course Project Final Paper_The Legal and Ethical Analysis of Apple Inc. - Course Project Final
MGMT520: Week 1 discussion
All for this textbook (17)
Written for
Dervy University
MGMT520 (MGMT520)
All documents for this subject (8)
Seller
Follow
ASolution
Reviews received
Content preview
Running Head: TITLE PAGE OF WEEK 4 CASE ANALYSIS 1
Chase vs Baer
Submitted By:
MGMT 520: Legal Political and Ethical Dimensions of Business
Submitted To: Dr. Luis Reynoso
, WEEK 4 CASE ANALYSIS 2
Parties of the case:
Chase and Bare was the defendant and plaintiff of this case. Chase was the writer,
director, producer and creator of many screenplays. He was also the writer of the famous
screenplay The Sopranos. Chase was the defendant of this case. In other hand the Bare was
famous prosecutor and he was the plaintiff of the case.
Facts of the case:
With the help of mutual friend chase and bare met many time before the release date of
the sopranos. In June 1995 the idea was shared by bare. The idea was fabulous and for the
implementation of this idea he request chase to write a script. In October 1995 bare conduct a
meeting with New Jersey Police department memory who had a wide experience by handling
criminal. Chase write a script and send to Bare after reading the draft both had a verbal or oral
agreement if payment (Adams, 2018, February 28). They both have verbally agreement that if
the screen show played and get a great audience then chased payed something for the services of
bare. But as per bare statement when the screenplay was succeeded the chase denied to pay to
Bare. After the bare sued chase, after the case the judgment was in the favor of chase and case
was dismissed by the court. Bare decide to appeal in higher court of U.S.
Procedure of the case:
In district court Bare filled a complaint against chase that he breaches the contract which
was implied in nature. In response of that complaint the chase said to the court that there were no
any material facts. Chase also tells the court that the implied control which was claiming by Bare
was vague and lacking to be enforced (Kostro, 2013, May 26). The district court written
judgment in the favor of chase and said that there was no material facts issue which were
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ASolution. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $17.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
