100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Lecture Notes - Constructive Trusts $3.91   Add to cart

Class notes

Lecture Notes - Constructive Trusts

 6 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Lecture Notes - Constructive Trusts

Preview 1 out of 5  pages

  • April 19, 2021
  • 5
  • 2017/2018
  • Class notes
  • Imogen moore
  • Constructive trusts
avatar-seller
Lecture 9 – Constructive Trusts



Last lecture we dealt with identification. Equity is a parallel set of rules.
PE and CT are creatures of equity. Also, RT you get out what you put in.
Express agreement or implied bargain, you infer but only by one action,
financial contributions to the purchase price.

Key case for acquisition: Lloyd’s bank v Rossett. Where there is deception
like in Eves, the court is more lenient.

Grant v Edwards:

Pre-Rossett. Unmarried. Grant had legal title with his brother. Edwards
was told she couldn’t be on the title, deception case. Limited financial
continuations and she wasn’t there at the beginning. What conduct would
she need to show to get an interest under a contructive trust?

“So what sort of conduct is required? In my judgment, it must be
conduct on which the woman could not reasonably have been
expected to embark unless she was to have an interest in the
house.”648 G-H, Lord Nourse).

She did get interest in the end, because of deception. Here not as much
work put in by the women as in Eves, she only contributes to the second
mortage. The law is almost unfair, but needs to be super unfair to the
deceiving party if you didn’t contribute at the beginning.

Burns v Burns:

Weren’t married. She didn’t pay much and got nothing:
Fox LJ in Burns: “if a payment cannot be said to be, in a real sense,
referable to the acquisition of the house it is difficult to see how, in
such a case as the present, it can base a claim for an interest in the
house.

“I think it would be quite unreal to say that, overall, she made a
substantial financial contribution towards the family expenses. That
is not in any way a criticism of her; it is simply the factual position”
(330G).

“The mere fact that parties live together and do the ordinary
domestic tasks is, in my view, no indication at all that they thereby
intended to alter the existing property rights of either of them”.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller teddyhunt. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.91. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67232 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.91
  • (0)
  Add to cart