Problem 2
- Does inclusive education work? how does it affect children with special needs and
those without?
- what are the pros and cons of inclusive education (regular classroom) vs special
education? who should decide?
- How does inclusive education work? Different methods
- what is the best educational approach for children with special needs?
Some overall points after discussion:
- are parents right to want special education? depends on their child’s need, there
needs be collaboration to determine what’s best for the child
- there seems to be no harm of inclusive education but that doesn’t necessarily mean
it will always be beneficial
- there are many variables that affect the effectiveness of inclusion students’
tendencies, teacher’s willingness and quality, amount of inclusion (different
moderators)
Ruijs – Effect of inclusion on students with and without special education needs reviewed
(broadest focus) (2009)
- the aim of the article: overview of the academic and socio-emotional effects of
including children with mild to moderate special educational needs on both the
regular students and the students with special educational needs
- overall trend is towards inclusive education
- there are major differences between countries in the policies of inclusive education
- 2 types of arguments in favor of inclusive education:
o 1. socio-political:
inclusion is a matter of human rights
most important right is to have good education even if this means
special education
rights can conflict – parents want inclusion, but special education is
better for the child
other children have a right to good education as well
there’s a right to choose
o 2. empirical: policy decisions should consider the effects of inclusion on
students (both regular and special needs)
achievement of students with special educational needs
- pros: they could learn from more able students, be motivated because regular
education focuses on academic achievement
- cons: less motivated and less self-confident comparing to others, likely to achieve
less than peers without special education
findings:
- majority of the studies found positive to neutral results
- this indicates that students with special needs achieve better in inclusive settings
than in non-inclusive settings
, - some warnings: some studies didn’t have a control group, there were major different
between the studies in the way the inclusion was designed
- one study found stronger effects in girls than boys
- children with SEN achieve more in math and language in inclusive classrooms
- there might be differences between different kinds of inclusion
socio-emotional effects on children with special educational needs
- special education: they might feel rejected because they attend special schools
- inclusive education: they might compare themselves, negative effect on self-
confidence
- travel long distances to go to special school, adverse effect about social contacts in
the neighborhood
- integrating children is believed to lead to increased opportunities for social
development
findings:
- mixed findings, not possible to draw a conclusion about the effect
- studies with no control groups: children with special needs are less liked than their
peers and are often assessed more negatively on sociometric questionnaires
- studies with control groups: mixed results
- number of interactions increase because of inclusive education but students with
special needs still have a less positive social position
academic effects on the other children in the class
- argument against inclusion: adverse effects on other students bc they take up more
of the teacher’s attention, the general standard of class may be lowered, and others
might be distracted
- argument for: in inclusive classes there’s more adaptive education which benefits all
students, extra teachers/assistants might have positive effect on students
findings:
- difficult to draw clear conclusions, mixed results
- large differences in design between studies, the amount of additional support and
the way children were included differed
- differences between schools seemed to be more important than inclusive or non-
inclusive education
- differential effect: inclusive curricula seemed to benefit the low-achieving students
social effects on the other children in class
- pro: children become more aware and less afraid of differences, fewer prejudice
- cons: children could copy undesirable behaviors from children with special needs
findings:
- little research about the social effects
- most results are positive, neutral or mixed, very few studies have negative effects
- children in inclusive classes have fewer prejudices, more willing to play with them
more and have a more positive attitude
- it’s unclear whether children’s general image improves or whether the positive image
only applies to classmates
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ebru1365. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.82. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.