100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Non-fatal offences against the person $13.97   Add to cart

Class notes

Non-fatal offences against the person

 3 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

Detailed Notes and Explanation of Non-Fatal Offences under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 and Criminal Justice Act 1988

Preview 2 out of 8  pages

  • April 27, 2021
  • 8
  • 2020/2021
  • Class notes
  • Allison holmes
  • Non fatal offences
avatar-seller
Non-fatal offences against the person
Week 11 – Seminar 9

1) Wounding or causing GHB with intent
2) Maliciously wounding or inflicting GBH
3) Assault occasioning actual bodily harm (ABH)
4) Assault
5) Battery

And reforms.

NON-FATAL OFFENCES REVISION NOTES


Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person

Assault/Battery

1) Assault
s.39 Criminal Justice Act 1988

Definition: An assault is any act by which the accused intentionally or recklessly causes another
person to apprehend immediate unlawful force. R v Nelson

Actus Reus: Any act which causes another person to apprehend immediate and unlawful force.

 - R v Constanza: Words can constitute an assault
 - Tuberville v Savage: A conditional, threatening statement, without an imminent threat of
harm, is NOT assault. But CAN be assault if intent is present Read v Coker.
 - Smith v Chief Constable of Woking: If the victim fears force, there is assault.
 Immediacy: Generally understood to mean that the victim must perceive the threat as one
which can be carried out "there and then”. The courts have on occasion however, given a
somewhat liberal interpretation to the concept of immediacy in assault. (Woking case
compared to R v Arobieke where there was no assault).




Mens Rea: Intention or recklessness

Maximum Sentence: 6 Months imprisonment




2) Battery
s.39 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Definition: Infliction of unlawful force on another person who hasn’t consented to it.

, Actus Reus: Use of force

- Collins v Wilcock: (good case) This involves the slightest touching. ITC: Touching of a
policewoman’s clothes when it was inappropriate to do so, was battery.
- Fagan v MPC: Omission is not battery, this was changed in DPP v Santa-Bermudez with the
creation of a dangerous situation.
- Haystead v DPP: Indirect force can be assault OR battery or even ABH DPP v K (Hairdryer
case)

Mens Rea: Intention or recklessness

Recklessness discussed in R v Venna:

If he lashes out with his feet, knowing that there are officers aroud him and knowing that by lashing
out he will probably or is likely to kick somebody or hurt his hand by banging his heel down on it,
then he is equally guilty of the offence”. Simple reckless element is enough, Cunningham subjective
recklessness applies ( R v Spratt )

Maximum Sentence: 6 Months imprisonment

Battery is generally divided into two categories: simple battery and aggravated battery. Simple
battery is usually a misdemeanor.

Aggravated battery, which is defined as:

1. battery committed with the intent to kill,
2. battery that causes serious harm to the victim, or
3. battery committed with a deadly weapon, is a felony.




3) Assault Occasioning actual bodily harm (ABH)

s.47 Offences Against the Person Act 1861
lOMoARcPSD|5974198




It is the level of injury that is important when considering a charge of assault occasioning ABH.

Actus Reus: Assault (Assault/Battery) occasioning (Causation) R v Roberts – The assault led to the
harm which caused the ABH - Actual Bodily Harm – Defined as ‘any hurt or injury calculated to
interfere with the health, or comfort, of the victim. Need not be permanent must be more than
merely transient or trifling R v Donovan

 - R v Chan-Fook: ‘Actual’ indicates the injury should not be so trivial as to be wholly
insignificant.
 - T v DPP: Can include temporary loss of consciousness
 - DPP v Smith: Can include hair by cutting it
 - R v Golding: Includes psychiatric injury, but NOT fear or mere fright.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller nehalcorsini. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $13.97. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

84866 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$13.97
  • (0)
  Add to cart