100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
The Beneficiary Principle Summary notes- Equity and Trusts $9.00
Add to cart

Summary

The Beneficiary Principle Summary notes- Equity and Trusts

 12 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

These are notes on the beneficiary principle created in 2019. They follow a structured format which condenses the relevant case law, statutory provisions and academic opinion that are relevant to the topic to aid with exam revision.

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • Yes
  • April 30, 2021
  • 2
  • 2019/2020
  • Summary
avatar-seller
The Beneficiary Principle: Charitable purposes:
 Important to consider first whether the purpose is
charitable, since the two factors that make a trust
Definition: void do not apply to charitable trusts
 Re Shaw’s Will Trust- Estate left to be applied to
 A trust must have ascertainable beneficiaries the creation of a forty-letter alphabet, held not to
capable of enforcing its terms (a natural or legal be a charitable purpose and so the trust was void
person with the right to enforce the trust against as a non-charitable trust.
the trustees)  Re Endacott- A gift of the testator’s estate to a
 A trust for purposes will not be valid (Morice v parish council was not seen as charitable
Bishop of Durham) a trust which was set up for
‘’such objects of benevolence as the Bishop shall
approve of” which was held not to comply with the  Alternatives to private purpose trusts:
beneficiary principle  Motive cases:
Leahy v AG for New South Wales:  What appears to be a purpose trust could be held
to be an absolute gift with the purpose being no
 A gift can be made to persons, but it cannot more than the nonbinding motive for making the
be made to a purpose or to an object gift (Re Osoba)
 Facts: A testator left his estate for his daughter for
Re Astor’s Settlement Trusts:
the remaining of her university education. When
 A trust was created for the maintenance of good she finished university, the other children tried to
understanding between nations and the claim the remaining money
preservation of the independence of newspapers  Held: The COA found that the testator’s intention
was held to be invalid as it violated the beneficiary had been to make an absolute gift to his daughter
principles. and the reference to education was merely an
expression of motive. Therefore, the daughter was
Perpetuity periods- The rule against inalienability: entitled to the whole of the property
 Property must be vested in individuals within a
recognized period of time and if it might not vest
within that time, any interest in that property
might be void
 It must be clear that a private purpose trust will
come to an end before the common law Re Denley Purpose Trusts:
perpetuity period of 21 years expires, or they will A purpose trust that would otherwise be void can
fall foul of the rule against inalienability be upheld if:
 Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 2009 extended a) It is for the benefit of known or
it 125 years ascertainable individuals
b) The purpose benefits the whole class of
individuals and is not too vague
Non- Charitable purpose trusts are generally void for two c) The trust complies with the perpetuity
reasons: rules
 In Denley, land was given on trust for a purpose
 Need for identifiable beneficiaries:
(the employee’s use and enjoyment of a sports
 Based on the beneficiary principle
ground) and it directly/indirectly benefitted
 Certainty of purpose:
individuals so was valid
 The purpose must be defined with reference to
 In Re Abbot Fund-
clear concepts and the means by which the
 Fund was raised for the maintenance and support
trustees are to attain the purpose must also be
of two disabled ladies.
prescribed with a sufficient degree of certainty
 The trust could have been seen as an express
 Leading case:
private trust with the beneficiaries being the two
Re Astor’s Settlement Trusts: ladies.
 However, the trustees had a wide discretion as to
 A trust was created for the maintenance of good how to use the money.
understanding between nations and the  Consequently, the courts understood the trust as
preservation of the independence of newspapers being for the purpose of benefiting the ladies,
was held to be invalid as it violated the beneficiary rather than for the ladies themselves. Valid trust as
principles. they could enforce it.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller BigH. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53068 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$9.00
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added