Introduction to leases and licences
Outline of lecture
Podcast 1 – Introduction: Ownership and possession, the idea of
property in land, how this relates to leases and licences
Podcast 2 – Licences: What is a licence, some examples, how might
a licence ‘morph’ into a property interest, thinking about power
and licences
Podcast 3 – Street v Mountford [1985 ] 1 AC 809: The context, the
definition of a lease
Podcast 4 – The sharing cases: Anontiades v Villiers, AG Secruities
v Vaughan, Antoni
Podcast 5 – the exceptional cases
Podcast 6 – the current context: Does the lease/licence distinction
have contemporary practical significance, the Assured Shorthold
Tenancy, the ‘re-regulation’ of private renting, the contemporary
housing crisis, property Guardianship
Ownership and possession
This week’s podcast builds on and develops concepts of ownership and
possession that we considered in week 15
• It draws on Kevin and Susan Gray’s essay ‘The idea of property in
land’ (This is not essential reading for the seminar, but is additional
reading)
• It is called "The idea of property in land”
• Kevin Gray (Professor in land law at Cambridge, interested in
conceptual meanings as well as an accurate understanding) and
Susan Francis Gray
THE IDEA OF PROPERTY IN LAND.RTF (cam.ac.uk) [ ESSAY]
• In Susan Bright and John K Dewar (eds), Land Law: Themes and
Perspectives (Oxford University Press 1998), 15 – 51 ] (essay
proposed by the Cambridge Professor, recommended reading)
,Key ideas in the essay
• Introduction
• Fragility of concept of property- difficult to get a hold of as a
concept
• Relationality of property
• Power and property- there is a correlation between property
and power (hierarchal concept)
• Property related to the proper ordering of things
• Property is not absolute but relative- power is diffused
through property in different ways
• Gradations of property
• Starts with a story to make this clear, also demonstrates how
slippery the concepts are
How do we think about property?
• (Third part of the essay) – the question at the heart of the essay
• Ambivalence of conceptual models of property, and its
consequences
• Dominant models of property (conceptual models) in land fluctuate
inconsistently between 3 different perspectives:
1. Property as fact
2. Property as right
3. Property as responsibility
• The structural indeterminacy explains the intractable nature of
land law dilemmas and Impedes constructive responses to land law
dilemmas
Property as a fact/ dominion
• Part of anti-intellectual streak in the common law fastens upon
facts
• What happens on the ground?
• The elemental primacy of sustained possession
• The propriety of the relationship with the land
• Sense of sovereignty and emotional security given by
possession
• The behavioural connotation of property (how much property
you have defines how you behave)
• The unease of the trespasser
The self-imposed boundaries of the lodger
• The occupier is, in some elusive sense, the master of his own
destiny: he is accredited with the quantum of 'property' which
corresponds most closely to the quality of his own behaviour
, The importance of possession
• The externally verifiable modalities of possessory control
• Claim to exclusive and unrestricted use of a piece of land generally
connotes a claim to either a freehold or leasehold estate
Property as a right
• Property as a right rest upon a complex calculus of carefully
calibrated estates and interests in land, so they are all
worked out
• Property relationships through the lenses of different types of
property interests which exist
• Your claim is not that you own the property but that you own a
right in or over the physical property
• You have an interest in it, IT IS NOT YOUR THING.
• One has property in an abstract right rather than property in a
physical thing
• Property has to have a clear-cut quality which means that its
presence or absence or infringement is clear
• You know that something has a property interest in this way
because of the way it complies with particular rules:
• Property must come in neat, discrete, pre-packaged conceptual
compartments, immune from tampering or amplification
• The government resists when people attempt to expand it
Property as a responsibility
• Elements of utility that can characterise relationship with land in
an economic sense
• The elements of utility require to be held in balance when
extracting value, this is mediated through the state
• Not so much a bundle of rights as a bundle of individuated
elements of land-based utility
• A state-directed responsibly to contribute towards the collective
exploitation of all land resources for communal benefit
• Less a right, more of a restraint
• Not the arrogance of the right but the commonality of obligation
and civic responsibility
How does this relate to the legal rules relating to leases and
licences?
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller tinablue. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.79. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.