100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Ultimate Auditing 3A Summary $2.75
Add to cart

Summary

Ultimate Auditing 3A Summary

1 review
 142 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

This is a simple and effective notes to help you understand the concepts and principles taught in the 3rd year of Auditing. The summary is guaranteed to give you a good indication of what usually comes out in the tests and exams. There is an in-depth analysis of each topic studied in the 1st sem...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 46  pages

  • Yes
  • May 12, 2021
  • 46
  • 2020/2021
  • Summary

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: mungenimafuika • 3 year ago

Helped me pass

avatar-seller
Auditing ultimate summary
PI score
- Calculation made at company level not consolidation level
- Belt, beneficiary, employees, liability of 3rd party, turnover, 1 point for every 1 Mil and for
employees take average

-Include temporary employees (worked 40 hours over 3months)

- Provisions only included if deemed to be payable and 3rd party is identified
- deferred tax excluded
- Loans within group should be included
- Trust should be counted as individual beneficiary interest (5 members of trust is 5 points)

- Exclude Liability from shareholders
- Exclude loans from directors
-Don’t round off, unless say part thereof
- All public companies must have external audit
- vesting rights is beneficial interest

- sometimes must extrapolate figures
-3rd party liability (NCL plus all current, look for additional info e.g. This amount was included is
a hint to exclude it)

-Directors and employees counted twice as beneficiaries and employees of comp

- look for any services rendered on credit as it can be added to turnover
- shareholders hide sometimes in scenario look if it is implied that someone is a shareholder
(Gary and 3 other shareholders, therefore there is 4)
-If PI score above 500, must have social ethics committee

,Prelim
- IFARCI (integrity, Framework, Audit fee, Reputation, Competence, Industry)

-Integrity, RMAFLIC (Bus Reputation, Money Laundering, Attitude of Individual, Attitude to pay
fees, limitations imposed, identity, sound corporate governance)
-Ethical requirements (threats and safeguards)
-Competence, KSRPD (knowledge, Tech skills, Resources, Personnel, Deadline)
-Procedures to gather info, BADSRS (inquire with Banks, Prev auditors, discuss with directors,
status of firm, review of docs, background searches)




Application
The following considerations should be made prior to accepting engagement:
-Consider our independence and are there any threats that affect our judgement

-Consider the conflict of interest with existing client and reputation of client
- Have the previous auditors been informed of engagement and can they communicate client’s
affairs
- obtain permission to contact prev auditors and determine if any ethical reasons to reject

-Do we understand the industry in which the client operates, Is it dubious (porn or anything
with violence)

- Can the client pay audit fee (maybe he’s in financial difficulty)
-Are there any limitations imposed by client that would result in going concern problems
-Different opinions is an indication of a difficult client

- Do we have necessary resources and staff to conduct audit (be aware of how many auditors
available and how many diff locations to audit)

- Do we have experienced and skilled staff
- Is there a tight audit deadline (e.g., req statements in 2 weeks), would entity have enough
time to gather sufficient appropriate evidence.

- Does Client have audit committee (shows good corporate governance)
- Are financial Reporting standards complied with, relevant framework selected

,Be aware that valuation problems can indicate company uses standards that show favorable
picture not the correct representation.

-Is it a sound corporate decision to accept.

- Is the engagement partner in charge (client continuance)
-Threats, apply safeguards
-engagement letter, address king4, responsibilities of auditor, management and other issues)

JUICY SOURCES
Solomon and Phillips
Scenario

They got offices in Pretoria, Bloem, and East London

The client is Zondi

Prev. auditors resigned as they couldn’t provide Zondi with quality audit service

The client supplies paper (industry)
They have distribution outlets in 10 major cities

The CEO is a qualified CA, highly regarded in industry
Prev ous resigned due to insufficient staff
Zondi awarded SH handsome dividends
The partner in our firm has 7.5% SH in Zondi
Solution

The industry
Not a dubious industry, manufactures paper (our year must have sufficient knowledge of the
client’s industry)
Client’s mgnt

The CEO of Zondi appears to have integrity as highly qualified CA
Communication with prev auditor
Contact the prev auditors in order to identify whether or not there is a reason why we
shouldn’t accept the engagement
It is unlikely there is a reason not to accept as prev ous resigned due to insufficient staff

, The ability to pay the audit fee
They can pay since handsome dividends
The ethical consideration

The partner in charge of the engagement has 7.5% in SH company, this might create a self-
interest threat to objectivity/ independence (mind and appearance)
The threat is regarded as significant
Safeguards to be applied – declare Financial interest to superiors or dispose of it

Auditors skill competence and resources
Consider whether you have adequate skills, competence and resources while taking in to
account the prev ous resigned shortage staff
There are 10 distribution outlets

The engagement letter
When it’s comfortable to accept the engagement, consider the responsibility of mgnt, auditors
and RI if it exists
Accept as long as threat reduced to an acceptable lvl




RISK OF MATERIAL MISSTATEMENTS AT FINANCIAL STATEMENT LEVEL



-Name (Intercompany)
International (Laws)
King4(corporate governance)
Bonus (Motivate)

New client (Familiarity)
Companies Act

JSE (requirements)
Overseas (Gas)

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller UKZNSaviour. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $2.75. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

49497 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$2.75  1x  sold
  • (1)
Add to cart
Added