100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Unlawful Act Manslaughter $6.45
Add to cart

Summary

Summary Unlawful Act Manslaughter

 43 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Summary of Unlawful Act Manslaughter with relevant case studies

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • May 14, 2021
  • 3
  • 2021/2022
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Summary sheet - Unlawful Act Manslaughter



Unlawful Act Manslaughter can be used to reduce a murder charge to Unlawful Act
Manslaughter (a form of involuntary manslaughter). Involuntary manslaughter is
unlawful killing without malice aforethought. Meaning that there is no requirement
for intention to kill or the intention to cause grievous bodily harm (GBH). Within
involuntary manslaughter there are two types. The first being “gross negligence
manslaughter” and the second being “constructive/unlawful act of Manslaughter”.
The main difference between murder and manslaughter is the sentencing as Murder
charges life in prison, however involuntary manslaughter can charge up to absolute
discharge with a criminal record to life in prison.




To prove Unlawful Act Manslaughter there is a three part criteria;

- There must have been an unlawful act

- The unlawful act must have been dangerous.

- This act must have caused the death

Also the additional information of the defendant must have had mens rea for the
unlawful act.




The first criteria to be met ‘The defendant must have committed an unlawful acting’
which means that the defendant was the one that committed the act, there wasn’t
anyone else it’s just the defendant. The can be seen in the case of R v Goodfellow
(1986) case, in order to get re-housed, the defendant set fire to his house making it
look as if it had been petrol bombed. While that happened, his wife, son and son’s
girlfriend all died from the fire. The courts held his conviction for manslaughter was
formed. Through the case of Goodfellow it is evident that this was an unlawful act
presented. To the contrary in the case of R v Lamb (1967), in this case there were two
boys who were playing with a revolver, within the revolver there were two bullets.
One of the boys pointed a gun and fired. Through the fire from the gun, it was the
course of death. The courts held that there was no unlawful act as no assault had been



1

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller MarieFR. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $6.45. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

52510 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$6.45
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added