1. Autocratic
● Leaders who adopt an authoritarian approach by making all the decisions rather than
delegating any authority to their subordinates.
● Suitable - situations that require quick decision-making or when critical decisions
have to be made e.g. during a crisis or when dealing with a hostile takeover/when
workers are unskilled so depend on directions and instructions of leaders
● Disad
- communication is top-down so opinions or suggestions of workers are ignored
- can cause resentment among employees as they have little opportunity to
make a real contribution
- Alienate and demotivate the workforce which can cause high levels of
absenteeism and labour turnover
2. Paternalistic
● Treat their employees as if they were family members, guiding them through a
consultation process and acting in the perceived best interest of their subordinates.
● Exceptional organisational skills and build trust with their teams
● Positive paternalistic style - when leader perceives workers as highly capable so
nurtures and develops workers.
● Negative paternalistic style - when leader perceives workers as less capable so leads
by guidance and control.
● Workers are expected to be loyal and obedient.
● Suitable - in countries e.g. Japan and India where cultural setting has enabled people
to work hard out of gratitude to their leaders
● Unsuitable - organisations that have flatter, informal structures where creative
thinking is required.
3. Democratic
● Involves employees in the decision-making process. They consult staff and consider
their views before making any final decision
● Result - better morale and job satisfaction as employees can express their views and
have input into decision-making
● Suitable - when leader cannot always be present to ensure employees remain on
task
● Unsuitable - when dealing with a large workforce or when there is dependence on
clear leadership e.g. dealing with trade union strike action or a public relations crisis
● Disad - delay decision-making because more people are involved in the process
4. Laissez-faire
● Minimal direct input in the work of employees. Instead allow subordinates to make
their own decisions and complete tasks in their own way.
● Leader sets the objectives but employees can decide how best to achieve these
using resources available to them.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ashleywong. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.48. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.