100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Samenvatting European History $5.86
Add to cart

Summary

Samenvatting European History

 16 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Cursus/Samenvatting European History (slides + teksten + notities)

Preview 4 out of 109  pages

  • May 23, 2021
  • 109
  • 2019/2020
  • Summary
avatar-seller
1THE FRENCH REVOLUTION
1.1 THE CONTEXT OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION (1789-1815)
o Not the first revolution in its kind
 Glorious revolution (1688 – 1689: England)
: Abdication of Catholic King and replacement by protestant king -> different religious
churches + different royal families involved -> switch from catholic to protestant church
 The American Revolution (1775-1783) -> Inspired by John Locke
: American independence from GB -> different motive + outcome than glorious revolution =>
were still very dependent on UK -> wanted more fair representation, “no taxation, w/o
representation”, people have right to protest if they do not agree
o Impact of these revolutions
 England: breach with tradition of “divine right to rule” -> if no roman catholic could be king
then no kingship could be unconditional
 USA: rights of representation and revolt against ‘unjust’ rule

John Locke (1689): Two Treatises of Government

o Two main premises:
 No government can be justified by one’s appeal to the Divine Right of Kings
 Legitimate government needs to be founded on the consent of the governed
= gives alternative to absolute rulers
o Social Contract Theorist – justification for the “state”:
 State of nature – Rational man
 He wanted a civil government founded on popular sovereignty
= humans = rather peaceful w/o government -> find common ground = voice of reason
 2 Controversial ideas: right to rule no longer comes from above “God”, but from below -> the
people
 Hops  complete opposite of Locke -> w/o government lots of conflicts => used in cases of
absolute governments

Run-up to the French Revolution

o 1) Economics – Financial Bankruptcy
 Louis XIV (“Sun King”) mass expenditures – Palace of Versailles
 French campaign in support of the American Revolution


1

,  Seven Year War (England/France): loss of many colonies (North America, Louisiana,
Caribbean Islands, …)
 Poor harvests, famine, and already harsh taxes and income inequalities
o 2) Politics: struggle with provincial “parlements”
 Louis XVI: inherited struggle with provincial courts who held the right to appeal to the King’s
edicts -> could counteract laws the King made
o The dismissal of Jacques Necker, controller-general of Finance
 Necker was critical of tax exemptions for nobility and clergy -> was tegen de
belastingsvrijstelling van de twee hoogste standen
 Favours borrowing money abroad; rather than increasingly (already high) taxes on
commoners
o The gamble of Louis XVI (1787-88)
 Proposes a “land tax” on all landowners (including nobility)
 “Assembly of notables” rejects the King’s proposal
 King attempts to bypass them by calling for a meeting of the Estates-General (= parliament)
: Instigates discussions on institutional design … leading to French Revolution (How to
organise parliament? Asked for in 1787-88)


 How to raise money to repay debts of France?
= Jacques Necker is dismissed >>> France depends on nobility and aristocracy -> cannot ask
them to pay more taxes
Aristocracy does not agree with “land tax”
 France was in crisis: had too many debts and too little resources to solve it


1.1.1 Ancien Régime system
•Demographic growth •Geography
- 1700: 20 million --- 1780: approaching - A jigsaw of land; result of previous
25 to 28 million conquests
•An agricultural nation - 1664: Saint-Domingue (today’s Haiti)
- 80% of the French people live on the - 1770: Corsica
countryside •Famine
- 20% live in urban areas; only eight cities - 1780s: Poor harvests
with a population over 50.000 people - 1788: harsh winter (57 straight days of
- Paris: 650.000 people frost in Paris); followed by floods
•Non-industrialised - Food shortages in cities
- Agriculture = 75% of all production


2

, - But low in productivity (labour - Ban on food exports, import of 148,000
intensive, out-dated methods) tonnes of cereal and grain
- Small estates (inheritance laws) - Rising bread prices: 70-90% of the daily
- Only large-scale farming around Paris wage of an unskilled worker
- Failed to keep up with demographic
growth
Agriculture

“The [French] country is a heap of ashes. Grass is scarcely to be seen and all sorts of grain is short,
thin, pale and feeble, while the flax is quite dead... I pity this people from my soul... No green peas, no
salad, no vegetables to be had upon the road, and the sky is still as clear, dry and cold as ever. The
flocks of sheep and herds of cattle stalk about the fields like droves (herds) of walking skeletons.”John
Adams, US diplomat*, 1775




Politics -> Always tense relationship between parliament & King

o King ruled by divine right (was almighty = absolute ruler)
 Some restrictions on King’s power via moral and divine laws, customs, principles of
administration
 Decision-making with King’s council (consultative prerogatives = raadgevend voorrecht)
o Absolutist rule = absence of a constitution (geen grondwet)
 Precise codes and rules varied across regional courts (legal pluralism = existence of multiple
legal systems within one population and/or geographic area)
!!! interpreted differently throughout the country => NO sole constitution, NO uniformity =>
CHAOS -> legal system is arbitrary + not consistent
o An intendancy system
 Great centralisation of power via system of provincial intendants (non-hereditary) (= high
ranking officials or administrators)
 Supervision & enforcement of the King’s will (=> very dependent on the King)
 Power over policing, finance, justice

“Parlements” = source of resistance against absolutist rule = provincial courts of appeal (judiciary
power1)




1
A balance of power thus arises: the different powers of the State maintain an equilibrium between themselves.

3

, o Historical origin: King’s council
 “Droit de remontrance”: power to appeal (in beroep gaan) to royal edicts2
 From 15th century onwards: election of three deputies (afgevaardigden) / town (a noble, an
ecclesiastic, a burgess)
 13 parlements but very uneven districts
 Paris court approx. 1/3 of France + very critical of King’s edicts



“Parlements”: a growing challenge to the King’s divine rights

o 1667: Louis XIV weakens right to appeal; later bans all “unrespectful appeals”
o 1766: Louis XV “Flagellation” speech in Paris Parliament :
 Reminds parliament of his divine right to rule (only one who can make laws, has power etc. ->
parliaments can only ‘add’ things to rule of King -> not change => Have no autonomous
existence) => TODAY = populist (references indirectly idea of Thomas Hops)
 Reduces practice to a one-time appeal + only short delay of royal edicts
o 1771: “coup de majesté”: reform of justice system; strictly defined system of appeals (-> door
Louis XV: vandaag vergelijkbaar met staatsgreep)
o Louis XVI restores right to appeal – quest for popularity; but rising use challenges King’s
authority (-> did not make him more popular only made his authority weaker)

Estates-general: legislative body -> Effect on FR?

o The legislative or consultative assembly of the three estates (drie standen)
o Advisory body to the King; presenting petitions (“cahiers”) from the three estates (especially on
fiscal policies)
o Late 15th century: elective character (third estate) incompatible with the divine right of Kings
o Met only intermittently, on the King’s initiative
o Last meeting = 1614 (absolute rule of King is established) … and then, in 1789

The three estates (= standenmaatschappij)

o PRAYER: First estate = catholic clergy
 Prayed for the people
 All property (5-10% of the land) was tax exempted (= vrijgesteld)




2
Royal edicts = edonopolitical legislation, missives (report) published directly by the monarch, that once
approved by the (zittende) royal, automatically becomes federal law.

4

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller imanehuyghebaert. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $5.86. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

51683 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$5.86
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added