100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Advanced Organisational Behaviour Lecture Notes $10.44   Add to cart

Class notes

Advanced Organisational Behaviour Lecture Notes

1 review
 49 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

HR411 Advanced Organisational Behaviour Lecture Notes from the University of Strathclyde

Preview 3 out of 29  pages

  • May 23, 2021
  • 29
  • 2019/2020
  • Class notes
  • Dora scholarios
  • All classes

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: michaelhewitt • 3 year ago

avatar-seller
Advanced Organisational Behaviour

Week 1

Employer Perspective:

 Person-job fit:
o Psychometric rigour (reliability and validity of assessment)
 Strategic fit:
o Best practice/best fit

Applicant Perspective:

 Two-way relationship
 Social/interactive process:
o Growing emphasis on employer branding in recruitment
o Candidate experience important for attraction

Societal Perspective:

 R&S practices viewed as mechanisms of control rather than neutral, rational, meritocratic
processes
 Recognise multiple stakeholders and power dynamics
 Socially constructed ‘ideal’ types of candidates:
o Unpaid internships favour those in high classes and who possess wealth
o SP suggests person-job fit is not a clean measurement

Tattoos in Hiring Situations:

 Other societal differences; gender, accent, class etc.
 Society cultivating views on particular personal and societal attributes
 Industry context/societal context effects

 Hiring Manager:
o Stigma of tattoos and appearance in regard to white collar sector i.e. lawyers,
doctors
o Clients have significant bargaining power in relation to impacting how much
business one firm can receive, so managerial personnel may base decisions on these
factors
o Finding ‘one size fits all,’ referring to recruitment and selection process
o May brand their organisational culture in a particular way in order to attract a more
diverse range of applicants
o Best practice from an employer to explicitly base hiring decisions on person-job fit
 However, unconscious bias more than usually contributes significantly to
hiring decisions i.e. subtle discrimination
 Applicant:
o Appearance shouldn’t lessen qualifications and suitability for a job role
o May be more likely to apply on the basis of personal culture fit i.e. more tolerable
organisational cultures
 Society:
o Growing awareness of personal complexities

, o Link between ethnic cultures and body art; could then be linked to possible
discrimination i.e. headscarves
o Wider society of possible social exclusion and job insecurity
o Society’s reliance on first impressions of applicants; making judgements on the
connotations of tattoos
o Movie culture has created a culture of tattoos attributing to crime etc.

Employer Perspective:

 Minimum Qualifications:
o Training/education i.e. qualifications, ratings
 RBS removing degree cut-off; assessing people in a way that attributes
actual personal attributes pertaining to future job outcomes
o Biographical data
o Weighted application blanks
 Ability/Aptitude Testing:
o Cognitive ability/aptitude e.g. numeracy
o Job knowledge testing i.e. technical areas
 Personality/Interest Inventories
o Personality traits, preferred styles or interests
o Emotional intelligence
 Interviews:
o One-to-one, panel, competency-based i.e. situational/behavioural
o Virtual i.e. skype, digital
o Video interviews
 Performance-Based:
o Work samples, simulations, situational judgement tests/competency-based methods
o Mini training/evaluation
o Assessment centres
 Highest fidelity to the job refers to highest match to the job role and
requirements
 Social Media:
o Potential employers screening applicants for regular social behaviours
o Does social media conform to any of the screening methods?

Person-Job Fit: Psychometric Rigour:

 Reliability:
o Consistency of assessment measure
 As used by different assessors; mapped to job performance; free from bias
 Validity:
o Predicting job performance levels and ability to achieve set organisational objectives
 Utility:
o Hiring methods and decisions must have high utility i.e. low turnover, high
contribution, positive future employment
o i.e. assessment centres have low utility for small orgainsations
 Fairness:
o Not basing hiring decision on degree, but basing it on ability to meet client and job
role needs

,  Organisational Results:
o Tenures of hires; productivity; career progress; success rates



Behavioural Science of R&S:

 Behavioural science explanations of unconscious bias:
o Sense-making;
 In unstructured interviews, which is still the most common interview
technique, interviewers’ tendency to identify patterns or detect trends when
they don’t even exist
o Cognitive load involved;
 Real decision made inn first 4 mines
 Interviewers prone to confirmation bias; selective attention to earlier beliefs
 Biases in final decisions i.e. status quo bias; groupthink effect
 Unstructured Interviews:
o Low predictive validity, no clear link between technique and future job performance
outcomes
 Structured Interviews:
o High predictive validity, good indicator of potential future job performance
behaviours
 Competency-Based:
o Highest fidelity to job role
 Virtual:
o Arguably time saving, may lose common social cues which contribute to
‘naturalness’ of interview
 Evidence of increasing structure in interviewing methods (CIPD, 2017)
o Study of 691 employers; 78% use competency-based interviews

R&S as a core HRM function: A more strategic employer model:

 One of 7 practices identified as ‘best practice’ HRM;
o Employment security/internal labour markets
o Selective hiring/sophisticated selection
o Extensive training and development
o El; information sharing; worker voice
o High compensation contingent on performance
o Reduction of status differentials

A More Strategic Employer Model:

 Focuses on organisational processes;
o Impact of organisational performance
o Legality
o Managing risk
o Speed; cost efficiency
o Alignment with other strategies
 The labour market;
o Labour market supply and demand

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ciaradeeny. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $10.44. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

58426 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$10.44  1x  sold
  • (1)
  Add to cart