100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Little Bites of Big Data for Public Policy, ISBN: 9781506383507 Governance and Policymaking (620089-M-6) Tilburg University $4.89   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Little Bites of Big Data for Public Policy, ISBN: 9781506383507 Governance and Policymaking (620089-M-6) Tilburg University

 45 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

Chapter 1 – Knowing Better, Chapter 2 – Get the Story, Get it Right, Chapter 3 – Tell the Story, Chapter 4 – Sell the story, Chapter 5 – Speak above the noise

Preview 2 out of 6  pages

  • Yes
  • June 1, 2021
  • 6
  • 2020/2021
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Summary Kettl – Little Bites of Big Data
Chapter 1 – knowing better
 We can’t differentiate between what we know and what we don’t
o People grab onto what they think they know, it’s easier than confronting gaps in our
knowledge  thus misinformation shapes our decisions, esp when the gap doesn’t
cause us personal concern, others’ opinions can be written off as idiotic; this isn’t on
purpose, people don’t do stupid things on purpose.
 We (think we) know more than before
o Because of big data, but this has to be translated into actionable insights with
advanced tools (and that doesn’t always happen correctly)
 Some evidence can be found for pretty much everything the govt does
o But evidence isn’t always right
 Decision makers don’t always follow what we know
o Because they only seek evidence that’s useful for them. And their decisions don’t
always lead the country in the right direction, example: war in Iraq – based on flawed
intelligence that wasn’t challenged, led to a long war with little gains
 We don’t know everything, and we never can
o The human brain is limited (we can’t understand and process everything)
 Some of what we (think we) know is wrong
o Example: in the Iraq war policymakers believed the movie ‘The Rock’, in which
nuclear weapons were carried in a glass container, this was referenced in a report
pre-invasion – this isn’t true in real life, glass can break and the weapon can then
hurt the people planning to use them. Esp elected officials overestimate their ideas,
bc their ideas get reinforced by crowds of cheering fans & their votes.
 We don’t need evidence to make decisions
o Policy analysts greatly overestimate the amount and distinctiveness of information
and analysis they offer for social problem solving – society can rely on “ordinary
knowledge” for decision making (experience and common sense)
 Policymakers will only use evidence if it’s useful to them
o They only seek evidence for problems they need or want to solve
 Thus: producing more evidence won’t affect policymaking
o If the evidence is not useful for them, they won’t use/accept it; often, they’re also
answers to questions that policymakers aren’t interested in
 Policymakers often trust their own instincts more than studies
o As studies often aren’t black-and-white, they’re often backward (instead of forward)
looking, and sometimes difficult to understand (when using complex algorithms)
 Making public policy better requires closing this^ gap between supply and demand in
evidence
o Five principles:
 Evidence is of no use unless its consumers want it and use it
 It’s important to get the story and get it right
 It’s important to tell the story in ways that capture what the evidence says
(and thus fits what the analysts who supply it know), and in language that’s
clear (and thus fits what policymakers who demand it need to know)
 It’s important to sell the story in ways that make the evidence convincing
 It’s important that the evidence speaks above the noise

, Chapter 2 – get the story, get it right
 Five fundamental questions for which policymakers need good answers
 Hindsight
 Foresight
 Results
 Risk
 Resilience
 Hindsight
o Trough program evaluation and randomized controlled trials. But: hard to randomly
assign individuals to treatment or control group, and it can be hard to deny people
the treatment, and they’re expensive and time-intensive.
o Policymakers don’t easily let go of ideas they believe in  knowing better doesn’t
necessarily lead to doing better, even when RCT’s prove something (example:
showing kids for one day what prison is like doesn’t deter them, it increased crime,
but the program continued nonetheless)
 Foresight
o Foresight is never perfect, e.g. the economic recession of 2008; computers don’t
always tell policymakers that the world has changed (and the eco crisis would be
worse/longer than expected); and policymakers don’t always ask the right questions
 Results
o Policymakers need to see trends as they’re emerging (performance management –
mapping what’s happening in real-time), which is dependent on:
 Accurate and timely intelligence
 Rapid deployment
 Effective tactics
 Relentless follow-up and assessment
 Risk
o Policymakers don’t always assess risks very well, or sometimes it’s impossible to do
so (example: in Flint, they decided not to install a corrosion control system which led
to high levels of lead in the water, which causes health problems). Important for risk
management:
 Get the leaders on board
 Identify risks
 Assess risks
 Develop an action plan (a response to risks)
 Monitor risks
 Communicate about risks
 Resilience
o Public programs need resilience to prepare for disruptions, to recover from shocks
and to adapt and grow from disruptive experiences– BUT, it’s almost always cheaper
to avoid/mitigate problems than to clean them up afterwards, it’s just not always
possible to avoid/mitigate every problem
 Good answers to these questions
o Three main puzzles when it comes to good answers:
 Silos of information
 Providing convincing answers
 Dealing with values (that policymakers and citizens believe in), the prism
through which we look at evidence

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller tessvamemst. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.89. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

64438 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.89  1x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart