100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
If it is hard to read; it is hard to do. How different fonts affect motivation and prediction $3.88   Add to cart

Essay

If it is hard to read; it is hard to do. How different fonts affect motivation and prediction

 6 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

A lab report regarding the issue of processing fluency and how it affects predictions and estimations.

Preview 2 out of 8  pages

  • June 8, 2021
  • 8
  • 2018/2019
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A
avatar-seller
If it is hard to read; it is hard to do. How different fonts affect motivation and

prediction




Abstract

Hypothesis: The participants who had the harder to read font will guess the

preparation time will be longer than those who had an easy-to-read font and willingness to

cook the recipe will be lower in those who had the harder-to-read condition. Processing

fluency was demonstrated in an experiment in which participants were given one of two

recipes for a meal. One recipe was harder to read than the other as it was printed in a different

font style. The actual content of the recipe was kept the same however and the size of the font

was indifferent. Participants were then asked to read the recipe and answer several questions

afterwards about what they had just read. It is argued that participants given the easier to read

fonts will be able to recall facts in a given text much more accurately based on processing

fluency. This would be shown in the answers given to the questions after the case study or

recipe has been recited. The issue is raised that some participants may naturally have better

memory skills than others or the font style may not affect them in the intended manner.




Introduction

The ease in which someone can cognitively process information can be significantly

impacted by the very text and ease of reading when reciting it. This experiment demonstrated

that a change in font style can expressively temper with the efficiency the participants can

process information of a recipe. Participants with the easier to read font are more likely to

remember and recall information and extracts from the text when compared to those

, participants who were given the hard to read print. Participants with the hard to read font are

also more likely to give a longer estimated time of preparation for the recipe as well.




Song and Schwarz (2008) also showed a similar result with their study “If It's Hard to

Read, It's Hard to Do: Processing Fluency Affects Effort Prediction and Motivation.” Three

studies were conducted in this experiment. The first being a study where participants (12

females, 8 males; average age 5 20.9 years old) were given a set of identical instructions.

However, the font style differed for each group. An Arial font was used for the easy-to-read

print, and the Brush font was used for the harder-to-read condition. The instructions were an

exercise routine and participants had to estimate how long it would take to complete. As

expected participants with the easier-to-read condition estimated a lower time for the exercise

to complete but both conditions had equal levels of memory when it came to recall specific

information about the text given.




Study two consisted of a similar experimental procedure. It comprised of a recipe for

a meal where twenty-seven students (22 females, 5 males; average age 18.74 years) had two

separate recipes, one of which was printed in an easy-to-read-font and one in a harder-to-read

font. The aim, again, to see if the text in a more difficult font style to read would affect the

outcome of answers when compared to that of the easy-to-read condition. An estimated time

to prepare the meal was asked to both groups. The study concluded that the easy-to-read font

condition group gave a lower time of preparation than those who had a harder-to-read font

style. Furthermore, they gave a higher willingness to prepare the recipe themselves when the

font was easy to read.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller adamhunt. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.88. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67866 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.88
  • (0)
  Add to cart