Summary
Samenvattingen Digitale Mediatechnologie (SOW-CWB1017)
- Course
- Institution
Samenvatting van alle kennisclips en literatuur. Goed overzicht voor het open boek tentamen.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
communicatie22
Reviews received
Content preview
ContentsOverzicht Theorieën...................................................................................................................3
1. Introductie............................................................................................................................13
1. Hvistendahl, 2019 – AI outsmarting humanity................................................................13
1. Flora, 2018 – smartphones en tienerbrein........................................................................13
1. Duurzaamnieuws, 2018 – VR maakt milieubewuster......................................................14
1. UN, z.j. – impact of digital technologies..........................................................................14
1. Bond, 2012 – social influence and political mobilization................................................14
2. AI..........................................................................................................................................15
2.1 Wat is AI?.......................................................................................................................15
2.2 Hoe werkt AI?................................................................................................................16
2.3 AI en de maatschappij....................................................................................................17
2. Araujo, 2020 – automated decision making and user perceptions...................................18
2. Gunkel 2012 – reorientation of communication studies..................................................22
3. Tailoring...............................................................................................................................24
3.1 Wat is tailoring?.............................................................................................................24
3.2 Tailoring in de maatschappij..........................................................................................25
3.3 Privacy............................................................................................................................25
3. Debatin, 2009 – Facebook users’ awareness of privacy issues........................................26
3. Kobie, 2019 – social credit system China........................................................................28
4. Social agents.........................................................................................................................28
4.1 Wat zijn social agents?...................................................................................................28
4.2 Chatbots..........................................................................................................................29
4.3 Social robots...................................................................................................................29
4. Nass, 1994 – social rules and computers..........................................................................30
5. VR/AR..................................................................................................................................31
, 5.1 Immersive technologie...................................................................................................31
5.2 Virtual reality.................................................................................................................32
5.3 Augemented Reality.......................................................................................................32
5. Liu, 2003 – head-up display.............................................................................................33
6. Phones and wearables...........................................................................................................35
6.1 Wat is het probleem?......................................................................................................35
6.2 Phone en multitasken......................................................................................................36
6.3 Phone en verslaving en welzijn......................................................................................37
6. The guardian, 2020...........................................................................................................38
6. Ward, 2017 – ever present phone.....................................................................................39
6. Bilieux, 2015 – smartphones as behavioral addiction......................................................42
7. Gaming.................................................................................................................................44
7.1 Belonende technologie: theorie en praktijk....................................................................44
7.2 Serious games.................................................................................................................45
7.3 Into the future.................................................................................................................46
7. Waarloo, 2019 – trucs in spellen......................................................................................46
7. Sicart, 2008 – newsgames................................................................................................48
7. Morganti, 2017 – environmental games...........................................................................50
,Overzicht Theorieën
Theorie Inhoud College
Fear and hype cycles Cycles with positive and negative appreciation 2
(zomers en winters) of AI. A lot of innovations and developments, so
in a hype cycle at the moment.
Framing and Attitudes and perceptions about automated 2
communication of ADM decision making are not only influenced by
technological sollution they offer, or their actual
performance, but also by the way in which these
ADM processes are framed or communicated tot
he user or subject of the decision (Araujo, 2020)
Neutrality of AI Assumption of neutrality and objectivity in AI 2
systems. They are however, created for purposes
that are often far from neutral: to create value
development and capital, to nudge behavior and
structure preferences in a certain way, and to
identify, sort and classify people. Systems are
often carefully and strategically articulated as
impartial and objective socio-technical actors in
discourse surrounding their implementation and
usage in different aspects of daily life. This may
lead to expectations of objectivity and fairness
of a machine (that exceed the level of objectivity
and fairness human decision-makers are capable
of (Araujo, 2020).
Algortihmic appreciation People prefer judgement or recommendations by 2
algorithms when compared to human ones.
Often based on the assumption that statistical
methods outperform human judgement.
Tendency to consider expert systems to be more
objective and rational than a human adviser
(Araujo, 2020).
, Machine heuristic The less a user anthropomorphizes 2
(vermenselijken) an interface, the more she or he
will consider its decisions and selections to be
objective and free of (ideological) biases.
Automated decision making systems might be
perceived as being unbiased and objective,
always applying the same set of rules especially
if its users consider that it is a machine that takes
the decisions (Araujo, 2020).
Computers are social Computers are treated as autonomous sources, 2
actors paradigm with the assumptions or rules decided by the
programmer when creating or managing the
system disappearing from the user’s view, or not
being as prominent in user perceptions (Araujo,
2020).
Less forgiving towards Recognizing that an algorithm makes a mistake 2
ADM – even when its overall performance is better
than of a human – was seen to be sufficient to
make people choose the human decision-maker
an thus leading to algorithmic aversion (Araujo,
2020).
Type of decision-maker Machines were more trusted than human non- 2
experts, but less trusted than human experts
(Araujo, 2020).
Knowledge and attitudes Comfort with mathematics or level of education 2
was shown to generally have better attitudes
towards algorithmic recommendations (Araujo,
2020).
Knowledge and fairness The higher the knowledge of compute 2
programming, the less the algorithmic-mediated
decision was perceived to be fair (Araujo, 2020).
In research of Araujo, knowledge seems to
impact less perceptions of fairness or risk.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller communicatie22. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $8.65. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
67866 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now