Class notes
Acceptance (Offers, Counter offers, RFIs, Conduct & Silence
- Course
- Institution
This lecture explains Offers, Counter offers, RFIs, Conduct & Silence as a form of acceptance in contract law.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
riyasharma
Content preview
L6. Agreement: Acceptance (Offers, Counteroffers, RFIs, Conduct & Silence
The Court of Appeal defines acceptance to be ‘a final and unqualified
expression of assent to the terms of the offer.’
They see acceptance as a ‘mirror image response’ which shows full
and clear acceptance.
Acceptance is very clear and simple, however there are a few issues and
complications you may come across.
Counter-offers
Leading case: Hyde v Wrench (1840)
This case is all about the sale of a farm. On the 6th June 1840, the
defendant Mr Wrench offered to sell his farm to Mr Hyde for £1000. Mr
Hyde then replied with a counter-offer saying he’d buy it for £950. Some
time went by and then on the 27th June Mr Wrench rejected Mr Hydes
counteroffer.
On the 29th June, Mr Hyde had a change of heart and he tried to accept
the original offer to sell for £1000. My Hyde saw an offer for specific
performance of the contract so he saw to enforce the contract at £1000.
However, the courts were unable to enforce this contract as Mr Hyde
killed off the offer with his counteroffer and therefore the contract was no
longer an acceptance. However, My Wrench was unable to accept this
new offer of £1000 because he had already sold the farm to someone
else. So the consequence was that there was no contract between the two
parties.
Rationale behind this case
This prevents the counter offeror having the best of both worlds. They are
unable to try counteroffer with a lower offer but also keep the original
offer open for acceptance if they wish. The courts didn’t want that.
The effects of a counter offer is two-fold:
⁃ Firstly, it rejects the original offer and extinguishes it. You are
unable to go back to that original offer.
⁃ Secondly, it is itself a new offer which will be capable of acceptance.
Requests for Further Information
Leading Case: Stevenson, Jacques & Co v McLean (1880)
This case is about the sale of iron. The defendant wrote to the plaintiff and
stated that he would accept 40 shillings net cash per tonne of iron.
The plaintiff responded saying ‘please wire if you would accept 40 for
delivery over 2 months or if not the longest limit you’d give.’ A while went
by and the plaintiff received no response, therefore he accepted the
original offer of the inquiry, however the defendant had already sold it to
someone else, and so they went to court over this.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller riyasharma. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.21. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
60281 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now