Summary
Summary of chapter 3
- Course
- Institution
This is a summary of chapter 3. With all of my summaries for this course I passed it with an 7,4!
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
biomedicalsciencesvu
Reviews received
Content preview
Lecture 3 – Explanation in scienceOne important aim of science is to try and explain what happens in the world around
us. Modern science is quite successful in its aim of supplying explanations.
Hempel’s covering law model of explanation
Scientific explanations are usually giving in response to the explanation-seeking why-
questions.
Scientific explanations have the structure of an argument
1. Set of premises: tell us why the conclusion is true
2. Conclusion: the phenomenon which needs explaining occurs
After the explanation the relation between set of premises and the conclusion must
be precisely hold in order for the former to count as an explanation for the latter. This
was the problem of Hempel
3 answers to the problem
1. The premises should entail the conclusion – argument should be deductive
2. The premises should be all true
3. The premises should consist of at least one general law (laws of nature)
(example: all metals conduct electricity, a body acceleration varies inversely
with its mass)
So, Hempel’s model of explanation:
General laws + particular facts => phenomenon to be explained
Phenomenon to be explained = explanandum
General laws and particular factors = explanans
The covering law model get is name: for according to the model, the essence of
explanation is to show that the phenomenon to be explained is covered by some
general law of nature.
Hempel drew an interesting consequence from his model about the relation between
explanation and prediction. Whenever we give a covering law explanation of a
phenomenon, the laws and particular facts we cite would have enabled us to predict
the occurrence of the phenomenon, if we hadn't already known about it.
Hempel claimed that every scientific explanation is potentially a prediction - it would
have served to predict the phenomenon in question, had it not already been known.
Hempel also though that every reliable prediction is potentially an explanation.
Explanation and prediction are structurally symmetric.
There are cases that fit the covering law model but intuitively do not count as genuine
scientific explanations. These cases suggest that Hempel’s model is too liberal – it
allows in things that should be excluded. See the 2 examples!
Case (i): the problem of symmetry
Situation A: zie pagina 41!
General laws: Light travels in straight lines
Laws of trigonometry
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller biomedicalsciencesvu. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $3.25. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
77254 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now