b) Does it make sense to perform a linear regression of GPA on IQ, age, gender
and/or self-concept?
Correlations:
GPA - IQ: r = 0.579, p < 001 (high correlation, significant)
GPA - Age: r = 0.092, p = 0.422 (low correlation, not significant)
GPA - Gender: r = -0.051, p = 0.657 (low correlation, not significant)
GPA - SC: r = 0.484, p < 0.001 (medium correlation, significant)
- Because GPA correlates highly with IQ and SC, it makes sense to perform a
linear regression
c) Which variable is likely to be a good predictor of GPA?
The predictor that has the strongest significant Pearson correlation with the
dependent variables (Y), is the best predictor of GPA.
Both IQ (p <0.001) and SC (p <.001) have a significant relationship with GPA, but IQ
has the strongest Pearson correlation with GPA (r = 0.579)
Perform a linear regression of GPA on IQ, age, gender and self-concept
- Analyse ---> Regression ---> Linear
- Dependent: GPA
- Independent: IQ, Age, Gender, SC
- Statistics: Part and partial correlations, collinearity diagnostics
- Save: Cook’s Distance, Leverage Values
d) Can the null hypothesis of no relationship between GPA and IQ, age, gender
and/or self-concept be rejected?
ANOVA Table
F(4, 73) = 23.117, p < 0.001
Yes, we can reject the null hypothesis (at least some of the predictors are good
predictors)
, e) How much variance of GPA is explained by IQ, age, gender and SC together?
Model Summary
R = 0.748, R² = 0.559 (variance)
0.559 x 100 = 55.9%
---> 55.9% of changes in GPA is explained by IQ, Age, Gender, and SC together
f) What predictor explains the most unique variance?
Coefficients
Correlations: Part (unique correlations)
h) Do Cook’s distances and Leverage values suggest the presence of outliers?
Residuals Statistics
Centered Leverage Value: 3 (P + 1) / N
3 x (number of predictors + 1) / total number of participants
3 (4 + 1) / 78 = 0.2 (0.2 = highest maximum value we are allowed to have at CLV)
---> Maximum: 0.929 (bigger than 0.2 = presence of outliers present)
Cook’s Distance: tells us if an outlier in the data is influential
Should not have a higher value than 1 in Cook’s Distance
---> Maximum: 7.918 (bigger than 1 = presence of influential outliers)
If one or more outliers are detected, steps 1 a) - h) are repeated with exclusion
of the outlier(s). Use Selection to get rid of the outlier(s).
- COO_1: Sort descending (highest values go on top)
- ID(78) = Cook’s Distance(7.918)
- Data ---> Select Cases ---> If condition is satisfied
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller gaiaantico. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.28. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.