a) Check the assumptions linearity, homoscedasticity and normality of the
residuals. Is the regression model a reasonable approximation of the data?
From the data in the scatterplot, we can see that the linearity and homoscedasticity
assumptions are met because the residuals are scattered randomly and without forming a
systematic pattern. Therefore, yes, the regression model is a reasonable approximation of
the data.
b) Is there evidence of multicollinearity in the data? (explain)
No, there isn’t any evidence of multicollinearity in the data. This is because the tolerance is
larger than 0.10 and the VIF is smaller than 10.
c) Are there outliers, influential points, or outliers on the predictors? (explain)
There are no outliers as the Std. residual < |3|.
There are no influential points as cook’s distance < 1.
There are no outliers on the predictors as Leverage < 3(2+1)/58 = 0.155.
d) What are the null and the alternative hypothesis to test the regression model?
H0: there isn’t a relation between reading achievement (Y) and language skill (X1) and
perceptual motor skill (X2): r-squared = 0
Ha: language skill (X1) and/or perceptual motor skill (X2) predict reading achievement (Y):
r-squared > 0
e) Can the null hypothesis be rejected? (report test statistic, df, and p value)
Yes, the null hypothesis can be rejected.
F(2,55) = 37,770, p < .005
f) What are the null and the alternative hypothesis to test the individual
coefficients?
H0: βj = 0
Ha: βj ≠ 0
g) Which predictor(s) is/are significant? (report test statistic, df and p values)
Both predictors are significant:
Language skill: T(54) = 4.344, p < 0.05
, Perceptual motor skill: T(54) = 2.998, p < 0.05
h) Write down both the unstandardized and standardized regression equations.
i) Interpret the unstandardized and standardized coefficients (see page 20).
Unstandardized coefficients:
Language skill + 1 ---> increase of the Reading Achievement by 1.049
PercMotorSkill + 1 ---> increase of the Reading Achievement by 0.464
Overall, there is a higher language and perceptual motor skill, meaning a better reading
achievement
Standardized coefficients:
The Language Skill is a better predictor for the Reading Achievement than the Perceptual
Motor Skill.
j) How much variance of Y in total is explained by X1 and X2?
k) How much variance of Y is uniquely explained by X1? How much variance of Y
is uniquely explained by X2? What is the best predictor?
LS = (0.380)^2 x 100% = 14.4%
PMS = (0.262)^2 x 100% = 6.9%
l) Draw a Venn diagram that illustrates the decomposition of the variance of Y
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller gaiaantico. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.81. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.