100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Module 3 Project Jury Duty.docx PSY1012 Module 3 Project: Jury Duty Rasmussen University G148/PSY1012 Section 07 General Psychology Jurys thoughts Non-guilty Juror 1: Kayla states, €œWhere is the forensic evidence? There are no fingerprints, no $7.49   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Module 3 Project Jury Duty.docx PSY1012 Module 3 Project: Jury Duty Rasmussen University G148/PSY1012 Section 07 General Psychology Jurys thoughts Non-guilty Juror 1: Kayla states, €œWhere is the forensic evidence? There are no fingerprints, no

 146 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Module 3 Project Jury D PSY1012 Module 3 Project: Jury Duty Rasmussen University G148/PSY1012 Section 07 General Psychology Jurys thoughts Non-guilty Juror 1: Kayla states, €œWhere is the forensic evidence? There are no fingerprints, no DNA evidence-not even a murder weapon!€ Jur...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • July 3, 2021
  • 2
  • 2020/2021
  • Summary
avatar-seller
PSY1012

Module 3 Project: Jury Duty

Rasmussen University

G148/PSY1012 Section 07 General Psychology


Jury’s thoughts

Non-guilty

Juror 1: Kayla states, “Where is the forensic evidence? There are no fingerprints, no DNA

evidence-not even a murder weapon!”

Juror 3: Jenna states, “But the witnesses didn’t even identify the defendant until weeks after

the night of the murder.”

Juror 4: Antonio states, Couldn’t the witnesses be misremembering? Like, maybe they had

the memories implanted. I learned about that happening on an episode of 24/7.”

Juror 5: Maria states, “Well the defendant is only 23. I just can’t send a young man

away to spend the rest of his life in prison -or worse – by trusting people’s memories.”



Guilty

Juror 2: Eric states, “Two people said they saw him do it. What more do you need? This is

an open-and-shut case.”



The Decision

I, Darius, the foreman for this jury, and I have summarized the juror's thought

(above). After reviewing all of the juror’s thoughts, the jury has come to a decision. On the

date of April

21st, 2006, we the jury came to the verdict of non-guilty for the murder of a bartender by

firearm at The Main Vein (a small local nightclub).

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller helperatsof1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75323 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling

Recently viewed by you


$7.49  1x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart