100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary HLS215 Midterm Assignment.docx HLS215 HLS215 Midterm Assignment American Military University HLSS 215: Regulatory Issues in Weapons of Mass Destruction HLSS 215 Midterm Assignment Defining weapons of mass destruction, referred to as WMD from here on $7.49   Add to cart

Summary

Summary HLS215 Midterm Assignment.docx HLS215 HLS215 Midterm Assignment American Military University HLSS 215: Regulatory Issues in Weapons of Mass Destruction HLSS 215 Midterm Assignment Defining weapons of mass destruction, referred to as WMD from here on

 5 views  0 purchase
  • Module
  • Institution

HLS215 Midterm A HLS215 HLS215 Midterm Assignment American Military University HLSS 215: Regulatory Issues in Weapons of Mass Destruction HLSS 215 Midterm Assignment Defining weapons of mass destruction, referred to as WMD from here on out, may be complicated due to the ambiguous nature of th...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 6  pages

  • July 29, 2021
  • 6
  • 2020/2021
  • Summary
avatar-seller
HLS215
HLS215 Midterm Assignment


American Military University

HLSS 215: Regulatory Issues in Weapons of Mass Destruction




HLSS 215 Midterm Assignment

Defining weapons of mass destruction, referred to as WMD from here on out, may be

complicated due to the ambiguous nature of the word. In general, the word implies fallout

following a catastrophic attack of some kind. The nature of the fallout depends on type of attack,

target, and the collateral damage associated with the attack. These factors can vary greatly, for

example some type of chemical attack where a person or group of people are targeted. Explosive

type devices can also be used much in the same way, with the added exception of property

destruction making it so that buildings or structures become the target and people are the

collateral damage. Another factor to consider is the political implications of the term. The term

becomes harder to define as it becomes more widely utilized by media and politics, especially

driving a targeted goal such as vote turnout or views for a particular agency. Unfortunately, these

aspects create a more complex use of the term and make it harder to provide one universal

definition. Additionally, the term WMD in articles saw a massive increase beginning around

1990 through 2010 as they became a more relevant area of focus in media and politics

[CITATION Car21 \p 3-4 \l 1033 ].

Defining the term WMD becomes even more complicated where a background could bias

an answer as well. For instance, a person with military background who may work on a

particular type of WMD may only associate that specific device and not recognize others. A

policymaker may utilize a stringent book definition (“black and white”) where a civilian with no

background but will simply refer to history and instantly define them as large-scale bombs. Even

, when analyzing an early defining of the terms in 1948 by the United Nations, it was left fairly

ambiguous. The U.N. defined WMD as any nuclear, chemical, biological, and weapons that

would be developed in the future that may be compared in destructive force to those listed above

[ CITATION And19 \l 1033 ]. Morally speaking, something such as assigning a monetary

value associated with the destruction or disruption by the use of WMD is difficult due to

placing a

value on human life. Similarly, difficulty exists in placing an arbitrary number of deaths to define

WMD, for example any casualty toll above 2,500 constitutes a WMD, due to moral challenges in

weighing the concept of casualties differently only due to the number of lives lost.

What we are left with is interpretation, any nuclear fusion or fission related weapon is

easily a WMD. Arguing any chemical or biological attack as WMD may be difficult due to

various perception of multiple lives lost or single target, but what must be acknowledged is the

potential. Chemical and biological attacks can be created to target a large scale of people and

remain relatively undetected and so they should always be considered a WMD. Simple yet

effective explosives, such as ammonia nitrate (fertilizer) bombs or improvised explosive devices

(IED), may be considered a WMD when we consider the intention behind the event. When

explosives are used outside of combat, targeting civilians or structures, the intent behind them

drives the definition of WMD.

Executive Order 12938, signed by President Clinton in 1994, first declared proliferation

of WMD as a national emergency [ CITATION The94 \l 1033 ]. The document provided an

overall framework for counter-proliferation efforts by the United States. The specific focus here

is going to be section 4 of the document, which delineates sanctions against foreign persons. The

language contained in the opening portion of section 4 clearly states that sanctions shall be

imposed against foreign person that willingly supports any efforts in regards to the use,

production, storage, or obtain chemical or biological weapons [ CITATION The94 \l 1033 ]. It

goes on to declare that foreign persons with sanctions are prevented from conducting business

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller helperatsof1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

82871 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart