In the current world it is thought that the only thing humans consume more than air, is content.
Social media has provided an international platform for individuals to share their views with others
at any given time. It is therefore vital that the content viewed is as authentic as possible, while still
maintaining rights of free speech. Censorship is a threat to free speech as it limits what social media
users view through algorithms, it is often counterproductive thus harming the people it claims to
protect, and it fails provide a platform for society to share their views, through it’s inherent bias.
Algorithmic censorship is a subtle, but powerful way to manipulate the public into believing certain
opinions purely based on their repetitive nature. Multiple popular platforms make use of algorithms
to show users exactly what they want to see, in order to substantiate their opinions on important
social issues. In this way social media has limited what users can see, and failed to present them with
differing views to their own. This creates a danger in society. It reinforces only one side of the issue,
while hiding the other side, thus taking away people’s ability to make informed decisions on their
beliefs. When a person is bombarded with repetitive information everyday, they begin to believe it
without considering differing views, which creates individuals shaped by a social media company
rather than by informed opinions. It creates echo chambers to constantly reinforce one belief, which
people start believing to be the only correct belief. Social media companies are also taking
advantage of young, impressionable minds online, by taking away their ability to construct a belief
system and think critically before decision making. Therefore social media censorship has limited it’s
users ability to form opinions on social issues, by limiting the content that they see, using algorithms.
Censorship is often thought to be the best way to prevent minority groups online from being
discriminated against. While, in theory, this concept seems to be effective, Nadine Strossen (former
ACLU president) believes it to be counterproductive. It is often minority groups who are
disproportionately censored, by a platform claiming to protect them. The Arab Spring movement,
when first introduced on Twitter, was heavily censored, and only when the majority of users were
involved was it deemed acceptable.Furthermore, censorship often only amplifies voices by
attempting to silence them. Everyone on the internet wants to know why their favourite celebrity’s
post was censored, and naturally that post would have been seen by millions of people before it was
taken down, and no doubt recorded by an individual only to be reposted later. Situations like this,
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller isabellarowley. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $2.84. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.