Part 1 Learning Goals
- What kinds of treatments are there for different types of eating disorders?
o Which treatment works best for which disorder?
o How effective are these treatments?
- Pharmacological, psychotherapy, family therapy?
- What factors contribute to the effectiveness of the treatments?
WILSON – COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY FOR EATING DISORDERS
BULIMIA NERVOSA
Treatment Model
- Fairburn CBT model of BN:
- abnormal overvaluation of the importance of shape and weight leads to
dysfunctional dieting and unhealthy weight-control behaviors predisposes the
person to binge eat
- purging is a means to compensate for the calorie intake or reduce/cope with feelings
of negative effect
- CBT drives from this model, it is theory-driven and manual based
- CBT targets:
o replacing dysfunctional dieting with regular and healthy pattern of eating
o stopping purging and other forms of weight control
o decreasing overvaluation of body shape and weight
- CBT-E: enhanced CBT
o reformulation of CBT to all EDs, not just BD
o focus on common processes that maintain different forms of EDs
o treatment planning is personalized (instead of matching diff. diagnoses it
matches the person)
o addresses patient motivation
o focused CBT-Ef: addresses overvaluation of weight and shape, explicit
treatment for “mood intolerance” as a specific trigger of binging and purging
o broad CBT-Eb: focus on additional mechanisms that maintain and complicate
ED e.g. perfectionism, low self-esteem, interpersonal difficulties
- It’s been argued that manuals result in an inflexible and uniform approach!
- reducing dietary restraint is a partial mediator of change in the treatment of BN and
is included in CBT e.g. inclusion of forbidden and trigger foods
Treatment efficacy
- NICE guidelines for manual-based CBT for BN have a grade of A (reflecting strong
empirical support provided by well-conducted RCTs)
Comparative treatment research
- CBT-E was superior to psychoanalytic psychotherapy and IPT (interpersonal)
o remissions rates are higher than the first-generation CBT manual
o impressive maintenance improvement
,Generalizability of treatment effects
- convincing evidence from RCTs, that CBT-E can generalize to routine clinical practice
Predictors and moderators
- early response to CBT could be a predictor of outcome at post-treatment
o a pro of CBT-E: psychologist evaluates the effects of treatment early in the
course, if there’s absence of improvement barriers must be identified and
changed
- patients with a longer history of ED are less likely to benefit from any treatment
- higher levels of overvaluation may predict worse outcomes
Guided self-help (gsh)
- combines a self-help manual with limited brief therapy sessions
- effective first-level treatment, rapid education in binging, effective compared to
control conditions, cost-effective
- promising for BN
BINGE EATING DISORDER
- CBT-E is directly applicable to BED as a transdiagnostic treatment
Therapeutic Efficacy
- NICE guidelines assigned a grade A indicating strong empirical support from RCTs
- manual-based CBT produces remission rates in BED between 50%-70% that are well
maintained at follow-up (reduction in general psychopathology)
- however, it doesn’t produce clinically significant improvement in body weight
Comparative treatment
- CBT is more effective than behavioral weight loss treatment (BWL) and
pharmacotherapy (longer-term effectiveness over fluoxetine or placebo pill)
- combining CBT with medication produces superior outcomes to pharmacotherapy
only
Guided self help
- CBTgsh is effective and produces promising remission rates from binging in follow-up
Predictors and moderators
- rapid response to CBT is a predictor of outcome in BED (as it is in BN)
o rapid responders are more likely to achieve binging remission, greater
reductions in binging frequency, ED psychopathology and weight loss
- rapid response in CBTgsh also predicts outcome
o can be used a first-line treatment, and if it isn’t work IPL can be used since it
has equal efficacy for rapid and nonrapid responders
- overvaluation and self-esteem are predictors and moderators of treatment outcome
ANOREXIA NERVOSA
- AN is the most difficult ED to treat and study
, - different treatments, including CBT, have received a grade C from NICE (reflecting
expert opinion in absence of empirical data)
- studies encourage development and application of CBT-E for AN
o completers show improvement in weight and psychopathology, results are
mostly maintained in the long-term
- No evidence that CBT-E is superior to TAU
EFFECTIVENESS AND SCALABILITY OF CBT
Efficacy:
- CBT has long-term results of 1 year or more
- a second alternative with long-term results is IPT
Cost-effectiveness:
- CBTgsh is a cost effective
- shorter sessions, shorter trainings, but still not less effective than IPT
Clinical range/reach:
- CBT is the only evidence-based treatment for all EDs, same training for all EDs
- applicable to adults and adolescents
- applicable and effective across different settings
Brevity:
- being brief is cost-effective and offers a realistic alternative to routine clinical care
settings
- CBTgsh is as effective as lengthier manual based BCT
Task sharing:
- limited access to mental health treatment providers
- task-shifting/sharing: training less qualified people to take on tasks, more availability
and affordability
- has been effective in some RCTs
- nonspecialized facilitators, clinically inexperienced graduate students even peers etc.
Ethnic, racial and cultural considerations:
- CBT and CBTgsh are effective on different cultures, races and ethnicities, not many
differences in treatment outcomes
Scalability
- CBT has the capacity to scale up treatment so, provide greater access to treatment
for large numbers of people who don’t have access
- the use task-sharing, self-help strategies, and technological innovations
- internet-based CBT treatments and e-therapy have shown positive outcomes
DISSEMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF CBT
- research-practice gap
- patients are not receiving evidence-based treatments in usual clinical care or these
are delivered in suboptimal fashion
- attitudinal factor among clinicals in which they ignore empirically supported evidence
in favor of their subjective judgement and personal experience
- solution is better education and training
- establishing institutional standards of accountability
- train-the-trainer model or web-centered training
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ebru1365. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.43. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.