Class notes
Lecture notes Constitutional and Administrative Law (LW1120)
- Course
- Institution
- Book
lectures on types of bias
[Show more]
Connected book
Book Title:
Author(s):
- Edition:
- ISBN:
- Edition:
More summaries for
-
Lecture notes Constitutional and Administrative Law (LW1120)
-
Lecture notes Constitutional and Administrative Law (LW1120)
-
Lecture notes Constitutional and Administrative Law (LW1120)
Seller
Follow
reshmabegum
Content preview
Constitutional Lecture 30.01.19 3 different types of bias:
a) Actual (rare)
b) Automatic disqualification
c) Apparent bias
Actual bias=decision maker actually bias so we can challenge decision they make; (however
it’s rarely encountered since it’s difficult to prove); subjective question; type of bias courts
recognise but in reality it’s rare
Automatic disqualification bias:
presumption of bias; e.g. judge/decision maker has financial interest in outcome of
case.
Financial interestDimes v Grand Junction Canal-judge had pecuniary interest in
outcome of case; Lord Chancellor had big share so it was decided they shouldn’t
have taken that decision and should’ve been automatically disqualified; Lord
Chancellor’s decision was quashed.
Partly in own cause Pinochet-non-pecuniary interest, Met. Police arrested
Pinochet in London although arrest was issued for Spain, case about whether they
should extradite Pinochet, made all the way to HoL and one of them was Lord
Hoffman, 3:2 (heart by 5 Lords and that they should extradite), found that Lord
Hoffman had relationship with Amnesty Int (who put forward arguments in case),
goes back to HoL and they agree that Hoffman should’ve automatically disqualified
himself (since he was so closely and actively associated), goes back to HoL and
redecided that he should be extradited, BUT in the end he wasn’t due to external
reasons. Due to Pinochet judgment, parameters of this category=uncertain
Locabail v Bayfield Properties number of cases combined to show what constitutes
automatic disqualification; it does extend beyond pecuniary interest; cases should
be dealt with apparent bias; could outcome of case realistically affect Judge’s
interest (trying to limit)
Apparent bias:
have to think about this more; appearance of bias
Test for apparent bias (Gough) Juror neighbour of one of co-accused; 3 Part test
(courts role)
1. Ascertain circumstances
2. What does court think?
3. Does the court think there was a real danger of bias? (high threshold?)
Test criticised so didn’t adopt it?
Medicines case, fixing prices artificially high (drug companies), Retail Price
Maintenance for over counter medicines to be decided by Restrictive Practices Court
(judge plus two members); one of expert members (while trial is ongoing) decides to
ask firm for a job (Frontier Economics who tell Competitional Auth who tells courts
and it reaches High Court), Court of Appeal uses this chance to revise Gough; Change
to Gough in light of HRA. Revised test:
1. Ascertain circumstances
2. What would a fair-minded observer think? (objective)
3. Would a fair-minded observer see a real possibility of bias?
Magill v Porter- political corruption-trying to win council elections by selling off
counsel houses in marginal wards (conservative party in West Minister) for
votes, unlawful as they were acting for improper purpose, cost council money,
District Auditor wanted to get tax payer money back, £30mn, DA investigates
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller reshmabegum. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.67. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now