Other
Contract Law Lecture Notes
- Course
- Institution
Tutorial work for contract law.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
zeynepberfubolten
Content preview
CONTRACT LAW I: FORMATION AND VITIATIONFORMATION OF A CONTRACT
Definition of a “contract:”
o Treitel defines a contract as:
An agreement,
Giving rise to legal obligations,
Which are enforced or recognised by law.
Offer / Invitation to Treat:
o “To amount to an offer, the offeror must make a clear, unequivocal statement
that he will regard himself as legally bound to perform his promise if the other
party accepts his offer.”
Distinguish offers from invitation to treat1:
It will not always be easy to tell the difference, as the cases show.
INTENTION IS KEY
Key Cases:
o Gibson v. Manchester City Council [1979] 1 All ER 972
“may be prepared to sell” not an offer says HOL
The language must be clear
o Storer v. Manchester City Council [1974] 1 WLR 1403 CA
What if it’s not an offer, what is it?
o Invitation to Treat
Good on display in a shop generally treated as invitations to treat
o Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v. Boots [19639 1
QB 401
Self-service shop – who makes the offer?
Where is the contract concluded? revocation is key
o Fisher v. Bell [1960] 3 All ER 731 sale of flick knife:
display was not an “offer”
Advertisements generally treated as invitations to treat and not offers
o Partridge v. Crittenden (1968), [1969] 1 WLR 1204 (QB)
Key Cases:
A display is not always an invitation to treat:
o Thornton v. Shoe Cane Parking (1970), [1971] 2 QB 163
(CA)
o Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v.
Debenham’s Retail Plc [2005] EWCA Civ. 892
o Warwickshire County Council v. Johnson [1993] 1 All ER
299
1
Steps in the pre-contractual process; negotiating process
1
, o Supply of Information
A statement may simply be a statement of information.
This is neither an offer nor an invitation to treat.
Key Cases:
Harvey v. Facey (1893), [1893] AC 552
Clifton v. Palumbo (1944), [1944] 2 All ER 497 (CA)
Pitt v. PHH Asset Management [1993] 4 All ER 961
o Statement of Intention
Parties sometimes communicate2 that they intend to do something.
Harris v. Nickerson (1873) LR 8 QB 286
Unilateral & Bilateral Contracts:
o Bilateral contracts are those in which there is an outstanding obligation on
either side.
o Unilateral contracts are those in which only one party is obligated from the
outset3.
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. [1893] 1 QB 256
Bowerman v. ABTA (1993), 145 NLJR 1815
Soulsbury v. Soulsbury [2007] EWCA Civ. 969
Termination of the Offer:
o Unless and until acceptance occurs, there is no agreement and either party may
withdraw from negotiations.
o Acceptance must occur in order for a binding contract to be reached.
o Offers terminate in many ways, but as long as they are open, they are not
binding:
Revocation:
An offer which is not accepted is non-binding.
o Payne v. Cave (1789) 3 TR 148
Where the offer is open for a specified period of time, it can still
be withdrawn.
o Offord v. Davies (1862) 12 CB (NS) 748; 142 ER 1336
The revocation must be communicated to the offeree, although
not necessarily by the offeror.
One cannot accept an offer that is known to be revoked.
o Dickinson v. Dodds (1876) 2 Ch. D 463
2
The communication is not intended to be binding thus there is no offer.
3
Means “start, the originating point”.
2
, If an offeree purports4 to accept an offer in ignorance of the
purported revocation, the revocation is not good and there is a
binding contract.
o Byrne v. Van Tienhoven (1880) 5 DPD 344 (Common Pleas)
1: offer letter posted by Def to PI in New York
2: before PI replied Def posts letter revoking the
offer
3: PI telegraphs and posts letter of acceptance
before receipt of 2.
Held: contract made – Def’s purported withdrawal
ineffective because not communicated before PI
had accepted.
Offer of unilateral contract is revoked once offeree has begun act
of acceptance.
o But up to what point?
Lukor (Eastbourne) Ltd. v. Cooper (1940), [1941] AC
1808 (HC) when complete performance has
occurred
Errington v. Errington [1952] 1 ALL ER 149 (CA)
once performance commenced
Daulia Ltd. v Four Millbank Nominees [1978] 2 All
ER 577, [1978] 2 WLR 621 (CA) (per incuriam)
revocation: possible until full performance subject
to implied obligation on offeror not to prevent
performance.
Rejection:
The offer may be rejected by the offeree, expressly or by
counteroffer.
o Hyde v. Wrench (1849) 3 Beav. 334, 49 ER 132 (Rolls Court)
o Society of Lloyd’s v. Twinn [2000] EWHC Admin 308
If a condition in the offer is not fulfilled, the offer terminated.
o Financings, Ltd. v. Stimson (1962), [1962] 3 All Er 386 (CA)
Lapse and Death:
The offer may lapse for want of acceptance.
o Ramsgate Victoria Hotel Co. v. Montefiore (1866) LR 1 Ex
109
o Manchester Diocesan Council for Education v. Commercial
and General Investments (1970), [1969] 3 All ER 1593 (CH
D)
If the offeror dies, the offer may lapse.
o Bradbury v. Morgan (1862) 158 ER 877 (Ex)
o Dickinson v. Dodds (1876) 2 Ch. D 463
4
Purport: to profess or claim to do something.
3
, 4
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller zeynepberfubolten. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $16.45. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
53068 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now