100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary 2.3 History and Methods of Psychology: Problem 6 $3.21   Add to cart

Summary

Summary 2.3 History and Methods of Psychology: Problem 6

 7 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Summary of the literature, videos, tutorials, and exercises for problem 6 of course 2.3 History and Methods of Psychology.

Preview 2 out of 12  pages

  • September 20, 2021
  • 12
  • 2020/2021
  • Summary
avatar-seller
PROBLEM 6:

KARL POPPER

Background:
- one of the greatest philosophers of science à social and political philosopher
- Took falsifiability as his criterion for demarcating science from non-science
- believed that scientific knowledge is provisional – the best we can do at the moment.
attempted to refute the classical positivist account of the scientific method à replacing induction
with the falsification principle.

Popper: Conjectures And Refutations
Popper’s Falsificationism
- Traditional account of knowledge was the platonic conception that it is justified, true, belief
- He claims that truth, justification and belief are not the distinguishing characteristics of
knowledge

Knowledge is not Justified
- We can never justify propositions or theories for several reasons
o We can never subject our theories to all possible tests, it is always possible that one of
the unconducted tests might falsify our theory
§ All tests that will be conducted will be a very small faction of all possible tests
o Does not lead to skepticism because he maintains that we can rationally criticize our
theories and hold those that have best survived our criticism
o Confirmation not the best method for arriving at truths
o Criticism is the best method of error elimination
o Knowledge grows only through correction of our mistakes à by falsifying our beliefs
and theories

Knowledge is not true
- Not something that is certainly true
- It is verisimilitude (truth-likeness) because it has survived our attempts to refute it
- Survival of our beliefs to these attempts at falsification allows us to say that these “look like
the truth” but are not absolutely true

Knowledge is not belief
- Knowledge not a matter of subjective belief but is objective in 2 ways

, o Claims when evaluation, become objects
o Problems, theories and arguments exist independently of whether anyone believes,
asserts or acts on these
Took biology as the most informative science for philosophy of science
- Evolutionary theory: exist as evolved organisms facing problems of reproductions in real
environment
§ we know that the environment tolerates our perceptions, theories and
movements because we are surviving
§ false theories/perceptions/movements can get us killed

How did Popper arrive at these conclusions?
- interested in the demarcation questions (when should a theory be characterized as
scientific?)

Science: relied on inductive, empirical method
o only if it rules out some observable states of affairs
o only legitimate to test only if it is an attempt to falsify that theory by seeing if states of
affairs can occur or not

General relativity (GR): Einstein’s theory of special relativity
- was risky (possible to deduce consequences from which in the light of the then dominant
Newtonian physics were improbable) and if they were false could falsify the whole theory.
- inconsistent with certain possible results of observation
- Is scientific
- makes bold, counter intuitive claims about nature of reality
- Can account for previously observed phenomena

Pseudoscience:
- Psychoanalysis: human behaviour is driven at least in part by unconscious desires and
motives.
- Freud posited the existence of the id, an unconscious part of the human psyche that aims
toward gratifying instinctive desires, regardless of whether this is rational.
- Not scientific à do not allow them to be falsified
§ Compatible with every possible human behaviour
- makes bold, counter intuitive claims about nature of reality
- Can account for previously observed phenomena

Good theory should divide the set of all statements derivable from it into 2 subsets

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller kianakyla. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.21. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.21
  • (0)
  Add to cart