100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary LLM International Dispute Resolution - International Commercial Arbitration I - Module 7 (Arbitral Procedure II) $8.39   Add to cart

Summary

Summary LLM International Dispute Resolution - International Commercial Arbitration I - Module 7 (Arbitral Procedure II)

 6 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

What is party autonomy? What is harmonisation? What is the procedure for arbitration? What are terms of reference? What is PO1? What is case management conference? What is bifurcation? Who are emergency arbitrators? What is interim relief? What is expedited procedure? What is summary dism...

[Show more]
Last document update: 1 year ago

Preview 1 out of 9  pages

  • October 2, 2021
  • August 14, 2023
  • 9
  • 2021/2022
  • Summary
avatar-seller
What is the relationship between the tribunal’s discretion and the applicable laws on
evidence?

Arbitrators tend to focus on establishing facts necessary for determining issues between
parties, and are reluctant to be limited by technical rules of evidence that might prevent them
from achieving this goal. Saleh1 believes that the amalgam of law and the tribunal’s
discretion may not please purists. Also, there is no longer assurance that a specific evidential
rule will be consistently observed as the notion of admissibility loses in legal certainty what it
gains in speed. Thus it is manifestly clear that the admissibility of evidence seems to have
been freed from the rule of law to avoid over-elaborate, parochial and legalistic prescriptions
of domestic law. Furthermore, the tribunal does not need additional hindrance by technical
objections of inadmissibility towards his vision, due to the obscuring of so many factors
intervening between his perception of facts (through his own sensory organs, acquired beliefs
via education and environment, his own legal training, difference in language, ‘smoke screen’
of at least one of the parties) and the facts themselves. Yet the blend of law and the tribunal’s
discretion does not present a major disadvantage on speed advantages, as it offers a more
direct and comprehensive access to the facts2. In addition, the tribunal should not disregard
basic legal rules to attain a clear unobscured perception anyway.

What is the burden and standard of proof?

Burden of proof

The burden of proof denotes the party who has the obligation to prove the assertion of
allegations or facts, but upon which party is the question. It is embodied in various rules 3. For
example, UNCITRAL Rules provides that ‘Each party shall have the burden of proving the
facts relied on to support his claim/defence’4. It can be discharged by witness or expert
evidence, document production, or both. In fact, if a fact is so obvious, judicial notice can be
taken without proof. For example, one such proposition might be that the earth is a sphere,
although members of the flat earth society would not agree5. The tribunal’s instinct will be to
‘establish a more rigorous testing of propositions that are inherently surprising’6. For
instance, a tribunal is not likely to accept an average businessman, performing his duties in a
normal way, as guilty of fraud, unless presented with conclusive proof. In civil law states, the
burden of proof is deemed a substantive issue. But in common law states, it is deemed a
procedural issue7.




1
Saleh, 'Reflections on Admissibility of Evidence- Interrelation Between Domestic Law and International
Arbitration', 15 Arb Int 141-160 (1999), pages 159-160.
2
Arthur Marriott QC, ‘Evidence in International Arbitration’ in (1989) 5 Arbitration International 3.
3
UNCITRAL Rules Article 25(6); ICC Rules Article 20; NAI Rules Article 27; Stockholm Institute Article 26;
WIPO Article 48; Zurich Rules Article 44.
4
UNCITRAL Rules, Article 27(1)
5
Redfern and Hunter, International Arbitration Chapter 6, page 12.
6
Hunter, 'Modern Trends in the Presentation of Evidence in International Commercial Arbitration', 3 Am. Rev.
Int'l Arb. 204 (1992), page 8.
7
Patocchi and Meakin, “Procedure and the Taking of Evidence in International Commercial Arbitration – The
Interaction of Civil Law and Common Law Procedures”, 7 RDAI/IBLJ 884 (1996) 889. Ferrari, “Burden of
Proof Under the United Nations Convention on Contracts for International Sale of Goods (CISG)”, 5
RDAI/IBLJ 665 (2000).

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ayorke. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $8.39. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67096 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$8.39
  • (0)
  Add to cart