Summary
Summary Marketing, Communication, and the Consumer MSc Communication Science
- Course
- Institution
Summary of the 21 articles that are used in the course Marketing, Communication, and the Consumer.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
lottebartelds
Reviews received
Content preview
Summary Marketing Communication and the Consumer MScCommunicatiewetenschap
Content
Bart, Y., Stephen, A.T., & Sarvary, M. (2014). Which products are best suited to mobile
advertising? A field study of mobile display advertising effects on consumer attitudes and
intentions. Journal of Marketing Research, 51, 270-285. doi: 10.1509/jmr.13.0503.
Belch, G.E., & Belch, M.A. (2015, Chapter 1). An introduction to integrated marketing
communications. In G.E. Belch, & M.A. Belch (Eds.), Advertising and promotion: An
integrated marketing communications perspective, 10, 3-39. New York: McGraw-Hill
Education.
Belch, G.E., & Belch, M.A. (2015, Chapter 10). Media planning and strategy. In G.E.
Belch, & M.A. Belch (Eds.), Advertising and promotion: An integrated marketing
communications perspective, 10, 337-371. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
De Pelsmacker, P., Geuens, M., & Van Den Bergh, J. (2013, Chapter 3). How marketing
communications work. In P. De Pelsmacker, M. Geuens, & J. Van Den Bergh (Eds.),
Marketing communications: A European perspective, 5, 72-119. Harlow: Pearson.
De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram
influencers: the impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude.
International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798-828. doi: 10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035
Eisingerich, A.B., Chun, H.H., Liu, Y., Jia, H., & Bell, S.J. (2015). Why recommend a brand
face-to-face but not on Facebook? How word-of-mouth on online social sites differs from
traditional word-of-mouth. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25, 1, 120-128. doi:
10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.004
Friese, M., Wänke, M., & Plessner, H. (2006). Implicit consumer preferences and their
influence on product choice. Psychology & Marketing, 23, 727-740. doi:
10.1002/mar.20126
Gibson, B. (2008). Can evaluative conditioning change attitudes toward mature brands?
New evidence from the implicit association test. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 178-
188. doi: 10.1086/527341
Jensen, J.A., Walsh, P., Cobbs, J., & Turner, B.A. (2015). The effects of second screen use
on sponsor brand awareness: A dual coding theory perspective. Journal of Consumer
Marketing, 32, 71-84. doi: 10.1108/JCM-02-2014-0861
Jin, S. A., & Phua, J. J. (2014). Following celebrities’ tweets about brands: The impact of
twitter-based electronic word-of-mouth on consumers’ source credibility perception, buying
intention, and social identification with celebrities. Journal of Advertising, 43(2), 181-195.
1
,MacDonald, E.K., & Sharp, B. (2000). Brand awareness effects on consumer decision
making for a common, repeat purchase product: A replication. Journal of Business
Research, 48, 5-15. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00070-8
McCoy, S., Everard, A., Galletta, D. F., & Moody, G. D. (2017). Here we go again! The
impact of website ad repetition on recall, intrusiveness, attitudes, and site revisit
intentions. Information & Management, 54(1), 14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2016.03.005
Nordhielm, C. L. (2002). The Influence of level of processing on advertising repetition
Effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 371-382. doi: 10.1086/344428
Romaniuk, J., Sharp, B., & Ehrenberg, A. (2007). Evidence concerning the importance of
perceived brand differentiation. Australasian Marketing Journal, 15, 42-54. doi:
10.1016/S1441-3582(07)70042-3
Tang, T., Newton, G.D., & Wang, X. (2007). Does synergy work? An examination of cross-
promotion effects. The International Journal on Media Management, 9, 127-134.
Thorbjørnsen, H., Ketelaar, P., Van ‘t Riet, J., & Dahlén, M. (2015). How do teaser
advertisements boost word of mouth about new products? For consumers, the future is more
exciting than the present. Journal of Advertising Research, 55, 73-80. doi:
10.2501/JAR-55-1-073-080
Trembath, R., Romaniuk, J., & Lockshin, L. (2011). Building the destination brand: An
empirical comparison of two approaches. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 28, 804-
816. doi: 10.1080/10548408.2011.623038
Van Noort, G., Kerkhof, P., & Fennis, B.M. (2008). The persuasiveness of online safety
cues: The impact of prevention focus compatibility of web content on consumers’ risk
perceptions, attitudes, and intentions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 22, 58-72. doi:
10.1002/dir.20121
Van Noort, G., Voorveld, H.A.M., & Van Reijmersdal, E.A. (2012). Interactivity in brand
web sites: Cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses explained by consumers’ online
flow experience. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26, 223-234. doi:
10.1016/j.intmar.2011.11.002
Van Reijmersdal, E., Neijens, P., & Smit, E.G. (2009). A new branch of advertising:
Reviewing factors that influence reactions to product placement. Journal of Advertising
Research, 49, 429-449. doi: 10.2501/S0021849909091065
Varan, D., Murphy, J., Hofacker, C.F., Robinson, J.A., Potter, R.F., & Bellman, S. (2013).
What works best when combining television sets, pcs, tablets, or mobile phones? How
synergies across devices result from cross-device effects and cross-format synergies. Journal
of Advertising Research, 53, 212-220.
2
,De Pelsmacker, Geuens & Van den Bergh (2013): How marketing
communications work (H3)
Introduction
Factors that have an impact on a consumer’s response to a communications message:
- Consumer goals
- Characteristics of product type
- Situation consumer is in
- Involvement in the product category
- Social, psychological, or cultural factors
Hierarchy-of-effects models
Hierarchy-of-effects models:
- Assumes that things have to happen in a certain order
- Earlier effects form necessary conditions in order for the later effects to occur
- Three different stages consumers go through when responding to marcom:
1. Cognitive (thinking):
Consumers engage in mental processes = lead to awareness and
knowledge of the brand communicated
Consumers become aware and gather information continuously and
effortlessly
2. Affective (feeling):
Emotional or feeling responses occur = associated with the advertised
brand and attitudes towards the brand are formed
Only formed when the need for an evaluation arises
3. Conative (doing):
Undertaking actions with respect to the advertised brand
Low-involvement hierarchy-of-effects model:
- Consumers might buy the product and decide afterwards how they feel about it
- Cognitive conative affective
Experiential hierarchy-of-effects model:
- Consumers’ affective responses towards a product lead them to buy it
- Affective conative cognitive
Foot-Cone-Belding (FCB) grid:
- Four different situations are distinguished (based on two dimensions):
o High-low involvement:
Involvement = the importance people attach to a product or a buying
decision, extent to which one must think it over, level of perceived risk
with an inadequate brand choice
o Think-feel dimension:
Continuum reflecting the extent to which a decision is made on a
cognitive or an affective basis
- Model:
3
, Rossiter-Percy grid:
- Alternative to FCB grid
- Classifies products and buying decisions in four categories:
o High-low involvement
o Transformational buying motives:
Positive motivations = sensory gratification, social approval,
intellectual stimulation
Block 2 and 4 from the above model
o Informational buying motives:
Reducing or reversing negative motivations = solving/avoiding a
problem, normal depletion
Block 1 and 3 from the above model
Advantage of hierarchy-of-effects models:
- Incorporate most important contribution = recognition of the importance of brand
awareness
- They consider brand awareness as prerequisite for brand attitude formation
- They correctly assume that affective responses cannot be formed or that a purchase
cannot take place without having an awareness of the brand
Top-of-mind awareness (TOMA):
- Indicates which brand is most salient within a product category
- Reflects the first brand that comes to mind when thinking of a particular product
category
- Top of mind brands = more likely to be purchased
- De meeste bedrijven proberen TOMA te bereiken
Shortcomings of hierarchy-of-effects models:
- Empirical support for the fact that consumers go through each stage is still lacking
o No significant relations have been studies between recall and attitudes
- Hierarchy models do not allow interactions between different stages = is very unlikely
Attitude formation and change
Attitude:
- A person’s overall evaluation of an object, product, person, organization, ad, etc.
- Attitude towards a particular brand (ab):
4
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lottebartelds. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.39. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
56326 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now