100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Health Psychology Summary of Smith (Week 5): Coping and adjustment to rheumatoid arthritis. In J. Suls and K.A. Wallston $3.20
Add to cart

Summary

Health Psychology Summary of Smith (Week 5): Coping and adjustment to rheumatoid arthritis. In J. Suls and K.A. Wallston

 11 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Summary of: Smith, C.A., Wallston, K.A. & Dwyer, K.A. (2003 ). Coping and adjustment to rheumatoid arthritis. In J. Suls and K.A. Wallston (Eds.). Social psychological foundations of health and illness (pp. 458- 494). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Preview 2 out of 11  pages

  • October 19, 2021
  • 11
  • 2020/2021
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Health Psychology – Smith (lecture 5) 1

Coping and Adjustment to Rheumatoid Arthritis

 Coping: person’s cognitive and behavioral efforts to manage the stress producing aspects of
one’s circumstances (including illness-related ones) → central for adjustment
 individual differences in adjustment to chronic illness, might be due to…
◦ self-efficacy
◦ control-related beliefs
◦ self-esteem
◦ optimism
◦ social support
→ coping is central among these constructs because coping represents behavioral
interface where these beliefs and resources are translated into thoughts and behaviors
that impact directly on health, well-being and adjustment
 coping research is in crisis:
◦ usually quantitative measures are applied to measure the degree to which individuals
employ various coping strategies, which are than compared across groups of individuals
→ exclusive use of coping inventories is limited and new alternatives should be
developed

Broad dimension vs Narrow Strategies
 one issue confronting the coping research concerns the level of specificity at which to assess
coping
 usually when using coping checklists, coping tended to be analyzed, and assessed, in terms
of broad coping dimensions (problem-focused vs. emotion-focused; active vs. passive)
 broad dimensions have drawbacks:
◦ combining strategies (active vs. passive) into a single score, broad coping scales may
obscure and underestimate the relations between coping and adjustment (e.g. use
different strategies in different situations) and important strategies might be overlooked,
ignored, or dropped from consideration if they fail to contribute cleanly to a simple
factor structure
 recently move from broad summary scale to examination of specific coping strategies
◦ finding → different forms of emotion-focused coping (i.e. attempts to manage the
distress resulting from stressful circumstances) differ in their relations to psychological
adjustment (e.g. positive reappraisal associated with good psychological adjustment;
wishful thinking, distancing, avoidance associated with poor adjustment)
◦ multidimensional approach should be used to assess coping
▪ drawback:
 assessment instruments can quickly become unwieldy → would have to use
coping inventory with at least 60 and up to 100 items which is costly in time and
participants good will (especially because patients might have limited attention)
▪ alternative:
 using shorter measure assessing broader subscales (systematically including
items representative of each of the multidimensional subsclaes) → same
drawbacks when using original broad subscale (mentioned above)
 adopt individual subscales but be selective in the subscales that are assessed →
only one which are relevant to situation which includes careful consideration of
problem area

Assessing Strategies vs Functions

, Health Psychology – Smith (lecture 5) 2

 concern whether one should directly assess the specific strategies used by individual or the
coping functions served by those strategies
→ most of the subscales assessed in multidimensional coping inventories do not refer to
overarching coping functions (emotion-focused and problem-focus coping refer directly to
coping functions served by strategy: e.g. emotion-focused coping leads to reappraise
circumstances in more positive light), but rather refer to the specific behavioral and
cognitive strategies in which persons might engage (seeking social support, avoidance,
positive reappraisal)
→assessing coping should be directed at measuring the specific coping strategies in which a
person engages rather than in attempting to directly assess the coping functions served by
those strategies because…
1. respondents are likely to be better able to report on which specific strategies they
engaged in rather than on which functions those strategies served, as the specific
strategies represent concrete behaviors and cognitions in a way that the more abstract
functions served by those behaviors and cognitions do not
▪ self-report limited: patients re sometimes unaware of their coping activities (e.g.
denial) and awareness of it might reduce strategies effectiveness
▪ however, some strategies more accessible to patients and their assessment via self-
reports is less limited
→ should focus more on assessment of concrete behaviors and thoughts
2. not necessarily a one-to-one mapping between coping strategies and the functions they
serve, sometimes strategy can serve problem-focused and emotion-focused functions
simultaneously (e.g. when seeking social support) & function of strategy often depends
on the context in which it is used (e.g. distraction – avoidant emotion-focused strategy
which is mostly associated with poor adaptational outcomes but can be helpful for pain
patients)
▪ further examples:
 denial found to be positively associated with positive adjustment in persons with
end-stage renal failure and cancer
 catastrophizing usually seen as passive and maladaptive emotion focused coping
strategy, however, in children found to be more active than passive → might that
it is an effective problem-focused way of getting attention and assistance for
persons who are otherwise relatively powerless to exert control over their health
condition or circumstances
→ recommend that investigators attempt to assess the actual coping strategies used in as direct and
concrete a manner as possible, and then to use those data to infer the coping functions being served,
rather than attempting to assess those functions directly

Specificity Imbalance in Current Inventories vis-a-vis Emotion- vs. Problem-focused
Strategies
 coping inventories assessing strategies regarding emotion-focused coping work better than
for problem-focused coping and are far more developed
 Emotion-focused strategies are largely intra-personal, representing variety of ways that
person can adjust or adapt to stressful conditions without actually changing those conditions
 problem-focused strategies, reflecting efforts to change the actual conditions to make them
less stressful, are inherently context/task specific → might be relevant and effective in one
context but not in another
◦ mostly used is a single subscale assessing something akin to “active problem-solving,”
which assesses the degree to which the respondent attempted to do anything (without

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller EllaBergmann. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.20. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

50843 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.20
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added