100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Societal Challenges & Innovation Theory $8.05
Add to cart

Summary

Summary Societal Challenges & Innovation Theory

1 review
 54 views  3 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

Innovation Sciences Utrecht University (UU): Analysis of innovation using theories of technical change and innovation for sustainable development.

Preview 2 out of 121  pages

  • November 18, 2021
  • 121
  • 2020/2021
  • Summary

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: charlotteschildknegt • 1 year ago

avatar-seller
Unruh 2000 – Understanding Carbon Lock-in
Problem Lock-in of technological and institutional co-evolution driven by path-
dependent increasing returns to scale

Method Exploration of interlocking technological, institutional and social forces
that can create policy inertia towards the mitigation of global climate
change

Aim It is therefore hoped that this exploration will illustrate a set of issues
that has been underappreciated in climate change policy debates

Deliver conceptual framework for carbon lock-in

Key concept Techno-institutional complex; carbon lock-in

Theories Path dependency (lock-in; increasing-returns)

Explore issues of lock-in towards a framework of interaction between technologies,
organisations, and institutions:

- Technological lock-in (LTS; RBV; IS)
o Technological systems: emphasizes positive feedback economics in creating
lock-in among large systems of interrelated technologies
- Institutional lock-in (neo-institutional)
o Role of private institutions in enhancing technological lock-in
o Examination of the impact created by formal governmental institutions

Barriers to the diffusion of carbon-saving technologies
Climate change results from consumer demand adoption of non-fossil fuel energy is both a
technological (bottom-up) and an economic (top-down) challenge: cost debate

Bottom-up studies find technology reduces carbon emission and lowers cost. If this is so, the
question arises “why don't carbon-saving technologies and practices diffuse faster if they exist,
save money and reduce climate impacts?”. Top-down models point toward technologies
cannot be cost saving when the total, economy-wide costs of their adoption are considered

Evidence for energy-saving opportunities exist but there are barriers to adoption

Technological systems
Fossil fuel energy is a large technological system: inter-related components connected in a
network or infrastructure that includes physical, social and informational elements.
Technological systems interconnected: overarch complex technological system; overarch
architecturally linked technological components/artifacts multilevel (levels of analysis)




1

, The evolution of technological systems
After era of competition a dominant design emerges, and a shift occurs from product
(Schumpeterian) innovation to incremental process (Usherian) improvement. Inferior design
can become dominant design over superior design in a path-dependent process due to
strategy, timing, historical circumstances. S-curve visualises increasing returns process:




Traditional economics focus on upper (decreasing returns) half: long-run equilibrium returns.
However, lower (increasing returns) half can create indeterminacy in competitive outcome

Four classes of increasing returns (positive feedback economics):

- Scale economies: production cost decline as fixed costs are spread over increasing
production volume
- Learning economies: reduce cost and improve performance as specialised skills and
knowledge accumulate through production and market experience
- Adaptive expectations: increasing adoptions reduces uncertainty, both users and
producers become increasingly confident about quality, performance, and permanence
- Network economies: emerge due to the interrelations among technical systems

After industry shake-out surviving oligopolistic firms shift from product to process
innovation and specialised knowledge development (market demand; complementary assets)
Logic of specialisation: continued refinement of dominant design can define a technological
trajectory along which firms incrementally develop know-how repeat incremental
investments commit firm to dominant design trajectory and create lock-in at firm level
incumbents are rarely source of radical innovations: core competencies become core rigidities



2

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Samme. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $8.05. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

52510 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$8.05  3x  sold
  • (1)
Add to cart
Added