Summary
Samenvatting Lectures Choices & Dilemmas (GW309K)
- Course
- Institution
In this document all of the lectures from the course Choices & Dilemmas are written out with extra notes from the lectures.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
RivdP
Reviews received
Content preview
Abstract lectures Choices and DilemmasWeek 1
College 1.1 – Introduction to Ethics
What is Ethics?
The Province of Ethics
- Morality refers to views held in society on right and wrong of human behaviour
- Yet, morality differs from religion, politics, law and etiquette
- Morality does not refer to standards of prudence. Moral behaviour ≠ prudent behaviour
- Morality refers to a more or less durable social institution: standards transferred from
generation to generation, the existence of which precedes their acceptance by individual
human beings
- Morality refers to behaviour with implications for others
- Moral judgements are not merely subjective
The concept of a Moral Position (R. Dworkin)
- What must I do to convince you that my position is a moral position?
o Is must produce reasons for it, but not every reason will do. A moral position cannot
be based on:
Prejudices
Emotional reactions
False propositions of fact
The beliefs of others
o I must genuinely endorse the principles my reasons presuppose
o The moral arguments I make not only presuppose principles, but also more abstract
views on moral reasoning
The Object of Morality (G.J. Warnock)
- If morality is a social institution, what function does it have?
- The purpose of morality is to overcome human shortcomings (Warnock)
- The general object of morality is to contribute to betterment – or non-deteriation – of the
human predicament, primary and essentially by seeking to countervail ‘limited rationality
and limited sympathies’ and their potentially most damaging effects
Approaches to the Study of Morality
- Nonnormative approaches: descriptive ethics, meta-ethics
- Normative approaches: general normative ethics, applied ethics
Nonnormative approaches
- Descriptive ethics
o Observer’s perspective
o Description and theory of prevailing morality
o Not asking normative questions
- Meta-ethics
o More philosophical
o Not thinking about what is right or wrong
o Reflecting on
The meaning of moral use of language
The differences with nonmoral use of language
The nature of moral judgement
Morality and relativism, morality and pluralism, etc.
1
,Normative approaches
- General normative ethics
o Participant’s perspective
o Systematic-philosophical reflection on prevailing morality
Utilitarianism
Deontology
Virtue ethics
- Applied ethics
o Ethics applied to a certain domain
o Medical ethics, bioethics, etc.
Relativism and Pluralism
- Morality and relativism (R. Brandt)
o Types of relativism
Cultural relativism; what?
Different moral judgements between cultures
Criticism
o Relativism with regard to moral judgements
o Relativism with regard to underlying moral standards
Normal relativism
Criticism
You must accept certain differences in moral norms between
cultures
- Morality and pluralism (A. MacIntyre)
o Pluralism Differences in moral judgement
This is a fact of life that there are differences
o Moral disagreement: what?
Can be overcome
What to do?
Objective factual information
Unambiguous terminology
o Be clear about the meaning of the words you use
Acceptance of common framework of moral norms
Use of (counter)examples
Analysis of arguments (logic)
Justification
- Assuming that it will not do to simply claim that something is right because we believe it to
be right, would it – then – be possible to justify moral judgements? In other words, how can
we show that something is morally right?
o Is it possible to refer to an independent standard?
Internal justification
External justification
- can we justify that we ought to be good human beings? Can we justify that we ought to live
moral lives? In other words, why be moral?
o Is living a moral life a reasoned choice? Is morality in the end a matter of reasons and
reasonableness or rationality?
o If living a moral life is not a reasoned choice, is morality – then – a matter of desire
and beliefs, of feeling?
If living moral life is a reasoned choice, could we – then – speak of
Moral knowledge?
Moral truth?
2
,Knowledge and Truth in Morality
- Cognitivism
o Naturalism
o Intuitionism
- Noncognitivism
o Emotivism
o Prescriptivism
- Reflective equilibrium
o A moral judgement about the right or wrong of a practice can be true, but only if it is
coherent with all other moral beliefs
The Ethical Perspective
1. A moral problem is a normative problem
2. No appeal is made to authority of dogma to come to a moral judgement
a. No judgement is based on something a authority has said in the past
3. Moral judgements should be based on good arguments exclusively
4. The points of view of all concerned are taken into account
Moral norms
- Common morality = universal morality
o People committed to morality, grasp the fundamental norms of morality, although
there may be differences of opinion regarding their precise meaning, scope, weight,
etc.
o Fundamental norms apply to all human beings in all circumstances
o Common morality is the product of human experience and history, shared by all
o No place for relativism and pluralism on the level of the fundamental norms
o Common morality encompasses moral convictions, not the standards preceding
those convictions
o Theories of common morality are historical products
- Particular morality ≠ universal morality
o Many norms do not apply to all human beings in all circumstances. These norms are
not vague and abstract, but specific and rich in content
o Particular moralities share fundamental norms with other particular moralities, but
not their specific norms
o Particular moralities provide for responsibilities, professional standards, etc.
o Types of particular morality:
i.a. professional moralities, medical professional morality
Moral norms
- Moral dilemmas:
o What?
o No practical dilemmas
o Not merely a technical dilemma
o A real dilemma is created by norms which really point to different directions
- A common framework of moral norms
o Principles
Respect for autonomy
Non-maleficence
Beneficience
Justice
Principlism in biomedical ethics
o Rules
3
, Substantive norms
Authority norms
Procedural norms
o Virtue, emotions, etc.
Moral Character
- Do virtues offer guidance?
- Moral ideals?
o What?
o Supererogatory acts
o Continuum of obligations
o Ideals in biomedical ethics
- Moral excellence
Again, Moral Norms
- Conflicting moral norms
o Prima facie obligations
Result in a dilemma
o Actual obligations
The obligation you feel, once you have reasoned, what you should do in the
end
In the health care this is all laid out
- Specifying principles and rules
- Weighing and balancing
4
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller RivdP. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.97. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
67232 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now