Summary and Lecture Notes Philosophy of Science in Practice
12 views 0 purchase
Course
Philosophy of Science in Practice
Institution
Universiteit Twente (UT)
This document contains 11.000 words summarizing the obligated readings and lecture notes for the course Philosophy of Science in Practice as it was taught as part of the first year of the Master Philosophy of Science, Technology and Society.
Philosophy of Science, Technology and Society
Philosophy of Science in Practice
All documents for this subject (1)
Seller
Follow
freekvanderweij
Reviews received
Content preview
Philosophy of Science in Practice
Inhoudsopgave
Week 1...............................................................................................................................2
Lecture 1:......................................................................................................................................2
Karl Popper – Science: Conjectures and Refutations......................................................................4
Thomas Kuhn – Progress through Revolutions..............................................................................6
Week 2...............................................................................................................................7
Lecture 2: Lakatos and Laudan......................................................................................................7
Imre Lakatos – Criticism and Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes............................8
Larry Laudan – From Theories to Research Traditions...................................................................9
Week 3.............................................................................................................................11
Lecture 3.....................................................................................................................................11
Morrison and Morgan - Models as mediating instruments..........................................................12
Ronald Giere – How Models Are Used to Represent Reality........................................................14
Week 4.............................................................................................................................16
Lecture 4.....................................................................................................................................16
Tarja Knuuttila – Modelling and representing: An artefactual approach to model-based
representation............................................................................................................................17
Peter Godfrey-Smith – The strategy of model-based science.......................................................19
Week 5.............................................................................................................................21
Lecture 5.....................................................................................................................................21
Helen Longino – Values and Objectivity.......................................................................................22
Heather Douglas – Inductive Risk and Values in Science..............................................................24
Week 6.............................................................................................................................25
Lecture 6: Value-Ladenness of Modeling.....................................................................................25
Kristen Intemann – Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate values in climate
modeling.....................................................................................................................................26
Kevin Elliott and Daniel McKaughan – Nonepistemic Values and the Multiple Goals of Science..28
,Week 1
Lecture 1:
Assumptions are necessary to connect your hypothesis with the real world and make
empirical predictions.
Through testing the prediction of the hypothesis, you test your hypothesis.
Premise 1: Hypothesis with auxiliary assumptions leads to/entails your prediction (H+A->P)
Premise 2: Prediction is true (P)
Conclusion: Hypothesis with auxiliary assumptions is true (H+A)
However, this is an invalid form (affirming the consequent). Therefore, a true prediction
doesn’t mean that the hypothesis (+assumptions) is necessarily true. Also, different
predictions can arise or different assumptions can be used and this might lead to a different
conclusion about the hypothesis. A hypothesis is not yet true for all possible predictions.
If prediction turns out false:
Premise 2: Prediction is false (not-P)
Conclusion: Hypothesis + assumptions is false (not-(H + A))
This is a valid form of argument. This is falsification. Popper thinks this is valid, while
confirmation (the previous type) isn’t. However, it could also be that your assumptions are
wrong. Therefore, you don’t have sufficient reason to say your hypothesis is false.
We deduce the predictions from the hypothesis (and the auxiliary assumptions) in the
hypothetico-deductive model of the scientific method.
It’s inductive to go from some observations in the world to a question. The formulation of
the hypothesis is therefore tentative and can’t be said to be really ‘true’.
For Kuhn, not the hypothesis, but the paradigm is the main element of the scientific method.
(Lecture 2)
Vienna Circle, logical positivist, like Carnap. They say only scientific statements are
meaningful statements. They distinguished analytic and synthetic statements, and only
those are meaningful.
Popper criticized the logical positivists. He thinks pseudo-science can also have meaning,
Popper doesn’t really care about that.
Verification -> induction -> not secure knowledge and no new knowledge, because their
predictions can’t be tested. With predictions, you can obtain novel knowledge.
Risky prediction means that is empirically testable.
, Does Popper mean not testable right now or in principle? It might be hard to find a
hypothesis that is not testable in principle.
Corroborating evidence is evidence that is the result of a genuine, but unsuccessful test to
falsify a theory.
Duhem-Quine problem (problem of underdetermination):
It is impossible to test a scientific hypothesis in isolation as it requires one or more
background assumptions.
You’re testing your hypothesis with the auxiliary assumptions.
Another problem: some justifiable scientific claims are not falsifiable (like probabilistic
statements)
Progress for Popper in science happens through conjecturing hypotheses and falsifying
them. This cycle contains the progress.
Paradigm shift are not rational choices, according to Kuhn, more like religious conversions.
This is why you can’t distinguish science from pseudo-science.
Progress can happen for Kuhn when within a paradigm more phenomena are explained, but
also when new paradigms are able to explain more phenomena. A criticism is that paradigms
are incommensurable, so how can you say that there really is progress? Kuhn feels like there
is progress, but it is hard to say how this is quantified. It is therefore also said that
incommensurability is not as absolute as Kuhn proposes it to be.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller freekvanderweij. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $8.03. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.