100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Is Aeneas an unreliable narrator when he tells the story of the Fall of Troy? $4.50
Add to cart

Essay

Is Aeneas an unreliable narrator when he tells the story of the Fall of Troy?

 31 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

This essay covers Book 2 of the Aeneid, discussing the ways in which he is unreliable in telling the story of the Fall of Troy and how he got to Carthage.

Last document update: 2 year ago

Preview 1 out of 6  pages

  • December 6, 2021
  • January 7, 2022
  • 6
  • 2019/2020
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A
avatar-seller
Lucy Martin


Aeneid Essay

‘Is Aeneas a reliable storyteller?’

In Books 2 and 3 of the Aeneid, Aeneas recounts his journey from when Troy fell to how he
ended up in Carthage. Given that this tale is told through the mouth of Aeneas himself, and not
Virgil, it is hard for the reader not to question how reliable and truthful this account is.

In Book 2, whilst Aeneas was sleeping and just before he enters the fighting to try and save
Troy, he dreams of Hector, saying that:

in somnis, ecce, ante oculos maetissimus Hector

uisus adesse mihi largosque effundere fletus,

raptatus bigis ut quondam, aterque cruento

puluere perque pedes traiectus lora tumentis.

ei mihi, qualis erat, quantum mutatus ab illo

Hectore qui redit exuuias indutus Achilli

uel Danaum Phrygios iaculatus puppibus ignis!

squalentem barbam et concretos sanguine crinis

uulneraque illa gerens, quae circum plurima muros

accepit patrios. – lines 270-280

“when Hector suddenly appeared before my eyes in my sleep, full of sorrow and streaming with
tears. He looked as he did when he had been dragged behind the chariot, black with dust and caked
with blood, his feet swollen where they had been pierced for the leather thongs. What a sight he
was! How changed from the Hector who had thrown Trojan fire on the ships of the Greeks or come
back clad in the spoils of Achilles. His beard was filthy, his hair matted with blood, and he had on his
body all the wounds he had received around the walls of his native city.” Due to all the techniques
Aeneas uses in this passage, his account of this apparition coming to him and its appearance feels
like it could be poetic exaggeration; a hyperbolic method of storytelling to make it sound more
interesting and keep his listeners engaged and captivated. If we think back to the death of Patroclus
and how Patroclus came to Achilles in a dream, telling him to bury his body and remember the
emotion that evoked in the sadness of that scene and the beauty of it this scene does not seem
quite as spectacular. We must note the general difference in relationship between Hector and
Aeneas: Achilles and Patroclus were set up throughout the story to be the closest of friends,
whereas to Hector, Aeneas was a subject – a good fighter and an asset to the Trojans, but not so
much a friend as simply a comrade-in-arms. Their relationship was depicted as much more
professional. In this passage in particular, Aeneas, in line 271, decides to delay ‘fletus’, ‘weeping’
until the end of the line, to put more emphasis on the idea of lamentation and thus as a way of
trying to create pathos and sympathy for the character of Hector, and so creating pathos for the
Trojans as a whole (since the death of Hector often symbolizes the downfall of Troy as a whole)
Aeneas = unreliable due to exaggeration and hyperbolic story-telling technique. This is then followed
in the next line by the word ‘raptatus’, ‘dragged violently off’, which includes within it harsh
consonant sounds, thus working to reflect the cruelty of the act of Achilles defiling Hector’s corpse
and so, in highlighting and villianising the actions of Achilles, Aeneas is clearly attempting to create
even more pathos for Hector and the Trojans. Once again Aeneas excessively adds to the creation of
pathos for Hector and the Trojans by the alliteration of ‘p’ in ‘puluere perque pedes’, whose harsh

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller mlucy3220. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.50. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53068 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.50
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added