100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
2.3C Problem 8 Summary $3.21   Add to cart

Summary

2.3C Problem 8 Summary

 65 views  2 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

Summary of 2.3C Problem 8 literature and articles

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • December 8, 2021
  • 3
  • 2021/2022
  • Summary
avatar-seller
2.3C Problem 8
Reductionism
Ontological
Reductionism (ontological)- the whole of reality consists of a minimal
number of entities or substances
 Usually meant in a metaphysical sense, that there is only one
substance and that is material
 Equivalent to monism
o Denies existence of unseen life force
 Could reduce material things to other substance (eg. consciousness)
 Could think there are 2 + irreducible substances

Methodological
Reductionism (methodological)- in science, small is beautiful
 In science, best strategy is to attempt to explain in terms of the
most minute entities
 “small” is relative
 Highly controversial- denies claims of hierarchical order in the
word
 Kuhn- theories are incommensurable, reduction is never possible

Mental
Reductionism (mental) – (about subject matter X) the claim that facts
about X can be reduced to facts about an apparently different subject-
matter Y
 Y= reduction based
o Add more?

Hochstein Et Al
 Debate between philosophy of mind and philosophy of science,
about how to best interpret relationship between theories, models of
neuroscience, and psychology
1. As both neuroscience and psychology improve with time, the
theories will co-evolve and converge into unified theory of cognitive
behaviour
2. Both domains will not converge, as two domains characterise the
systems at different levels of organisation
o Psychology: function states of systems can be realised in
different way by different mechanisms
o Neuroscience: characterise physical implementation of
neurological mechanisms
 Theories of psychology irreducible to neuroscience theories, as they
exist independently from any system that realises them
Hochstein: both 1 and 2 are incorrect: the domains aren’t independent but
they won’t ever unite to one point
1. Traditional Characterisations of Psychological/neuroscientific divide
a) Convergence
 Both domains share the same goal of developing ideal theory
of cognitive behaviour

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lablyth. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.21. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

70055 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.21  2x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart